Transcript deat donor strategy - Amazon Web Services

DEAT DONOR STRATEGY
NOVEMBER 2006
DEAT DONOR STRATEGY
AIM OF THE STRATEGY
 To have a more strategic and focused bilateral donor
engagement that is DEAT driven and contributes to
achieving our strategic objectives and priorities.
DEAT BILATERAL ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
MATRIX
The donor strategy matrix has been developed with a view
to addressing the following two focus areas:
 The countries
 Specific sectoral areas of cooperation.
DEAT DONOR STRATEGY MATRIX
COUNTRIES
In determining the countries to cooperate with we looked at:
 Strategic political priorities of South Africa,
 The technical expertise available in these countries
 The financial and technical resources we are able to
mobilize through development assistance.
The following countries have been identified.
 Australasia - Japan, Australia, New Zealand
 North America – USA
 Europe - Norway, Denmark, Germany, Finland, UK,
France, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Switzerland and the
European Union
DEAT DONOR STRATEGY MATRIX
RECIPIENT DONOR FUNDING – PROBLEMS

Programmes and projects are seen as separate processes from the normal core
functions of DEAT - Not integrated into DEAT strategic plan.

Too project orientated with no coherent programmatic approach.

Funding the donors priorities or pet projects of officials.

No coherent financing packages are being developed, lack of effective utilization of
total resources available and a lack of leveraging new resources such as private sector.

No clear programme/project champions and constant changes of programme/project
managers.

No effective engagement with provinces, NGO’s etc in developing a coherent
programme.

Donor funding has been unpredictable, uncertain and unsustainable.
DEAT DONOR STRATEGY MATRIX RECIPIENT DONOR
FUNDING – CRITERIA
Donor funding is based on a finite period and also dependent on external and
internal factors - Donor country’s economic situation, global influences (War
on terrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq) and new governments (Denmark). Donor
funding should be utilized:

To fund short term initiatives

As start-up capital to leverage other resources

To fund initiatives which, if not fully implemented as a result of termination of
funding, would not be a major obstacle to South Africa achieving its strategic
objectives
DEAT DONOR STRATEGY MATRIX
RECIPIENT DONOR FUNDING – NICHE GENERIC AREAS
 Research and development
 Knowledge management systems
 Planning systems
 Communication/ awareness raising
 Training and capacity building
SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – EQ&P
COUNTRIES:

Norway, Denmark, Germany, USA, Finland, UK, France, Netherlands, EU, Belgium,
Switzerland
AREAS OF COOPERATION

Policy formulation and implementation of waste management including recycling and
waste minimisation.

Technical assistance – Air quality modelling and emission standard setting

Compliance and Enforcement

Climate Change – Adaptation, Renewable energy, Technology development (In
collaboration with Dept of Science and Technology), Integration of climate information
into government planning and disaster management, Greenhouse gas inventory/
systems, Health (In collaboration with Dept of Health), Transport

Chemicals – Remediation (Asbestos)

Sustainable consumption and production (Best Practice)
SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – TOURISM
COUNTRIES:
 Spain, Japan, EU, Germany, France
AREAS OF COOPERATION
 Capacity Building and SMME Development
 Business training for entrepreneurs
 Language training
 2010 Soccer World Cup
 Eco-tourism
 Joint marketing Initiatives
SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – B&C
COUNTRIES:
• Norway, EU, Grmany (GTZ)
AREAS OF COOPERATION
• Biodiversity Act and NBSAP – Implementation; Monitoring and
evaluation; Bioregional plans (Expanded)
• Expansion of protected areas
• Access and benefit sharing
SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – MCM
COUNTRIES:

Norway, France, New Zealand, USA
AREAS OF COOPERATION

Fisheries management capacity

Scholarships and training

Fisheries research, Socio-economic research and Scientific capacity

Monitoring, control and surveillance

Straddling fish stocks

Marine Pollution

Small scale and subsistence fisheries

Aquaculture

Marine Protected Areas (incl protected areas beyond national boundaries)

Large Marine Eco-systems
SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – ENV GOV & SUS
DEV
COUNTRIES:
• Norway, Denmark, Finland, Uk, Germany, France,
AREAS OF COOPERATION
• Environmental planning and governance - Integrated environmental
planning and reporting framework; SOER
• Sustainable Development - Policy capacity; SD indicators; Capacity
to integrate SD objectives in IDPs; Awareness raising
SOUTH AFRICA’S DONOR PORTFOLIO
•
Norway - Marine fisheries (NOK 40 million over 5 years) and Environment
(Pollution and Waste, Biodiversity, Environmental Governance) (NOK 40 million
over 5 years)
•
Denmark (DKK 220 million over 5 years) - Air quality; Waste management;
Energy; Mainstreaming environment into administration and planning;
Knowledge creation; Civil society and the private sector
•
Germany (GTZ) - Community based natural resource (Euro 1 million till Dec
2007)
•
Finland - Funding to the North West Province Department of Agriculture,
Conservation and Environment to support environment and sustainable
development in the North West. (Euro 2.4 million for period 2006-2008)
•
European Union – Pollution and waste management, natural resource
management, climate change, tourism (New Programme 2007 – 2013 approx
Euro 30 million)
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY PORTFOLIO
•
South Africa is both recipient of GEF resources (approx US$ 100 million) and
donor to the GEF 4th Replenishment (Contribution of SDR 4 million = R 38 million
over 4 years)
•
GEF 4th Replenishment = US$ 3.13 billion (4 years)
– Biodiversity (US$ 1 billion)
– Climate Change (US$ 1 billion)
– International Waters (US$ 355 million)
– POPs (US$ 300 million)
– Land Degradation and Desertification (US$ 300 million)
– Ozone (US$ 40 million)
•
Under the new GEF resource allocation system countries have been provided
with an indicative allocation for biodiversity and climate change. The South
African allocations are as follows:
– Biodiversity (US$ 22,5 million)
– Climate Change (US$ 23.9 million)
SOUTH AFRICA’S GEF PORTFOLIO
South African Project Portfolio (Some of the key projects)
•
Development and Implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action
Plan (BSAP) in South Africa. (US$ 409 000)
•
Maloti-Drakensberg Conservation and Development Project – Africa, Regional (US$
15,548 million)
•
Cape Action Plan for the People and Environment (CAPE): (US$ 11,32 million)
•
South Africa Wind Energy Programme (SAWEP) Phase I (US$ 2,295 million)
•
Market Transformation through Energy Efficiency Standards and Labelling of
Appliances in South Africa (US$ 6 million)
•
Sustainable Public Transport and Sport: a 2010 Opportunity (US$ 11,197 million)
•
Integrated Management of the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem (BCLME)
– Africa, Regional (US$ 15,458 million)
•
The African Stockpile Programme (ASP): Funding the Prevention and Disposal of
Obsolete Pesticides from African Countries – Africa, Regional (US$ 25,7 million)
•
Sub-project 1st Group/Plug Power - under the Global Fuel Cells Financing Initiative
for Distributed Generation Applications (Phase 1)
(US$ 3,275 million)
THANK YOU