Financing climate-friendly projects in the Balkan region
Download
Report
Transcript Financing climate-friendly projects in the Balkan region
Financing climate-friendly projects
in the Balkan region
DAC PROJECT
CAPACITY BUILDING IN BALKAN COUNTRIES IN ORDER TO DEAL WITH CLIMATE CHANGE
Prepared by: Stelios Psomas
OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL FINANCIAL FLOWS
IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE
Domestic savings provide by far the major financial resource for investments in
climate-friendly projects.
The role of Official Development Assistance (ODA) is likely to be rather limited in the
context of climate change.
The majority of the new investment opportunities will be taken up by the private
sector.
The role of the public sector in relation to investments should first and foremost be
the creation of an enabling environment for private sector investment in support of
sustainable development.
Public funding, in particular official development finance and GEF, will be
supplementary to private funding. Public investment, whether domestic or foreign,
can play a role in those areas where it has a clear comparative advantage, and
where additional social benefits are to be expected.
NEW AND ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL RESOURCES
Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) will continue (as decided in Marrakech
COP7). EU funding for AIJ is anticipated.
Immediate start of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). CDM projects can
generate certified emission reductions (CERs) retroactively as from 1-1-2000.
Institutional framework for Joint Implementation (JI) has been established giving
way for an effective implementation.
New and additional funding will be provided through:
Increased GEF replenishment
A Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF)
A Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF)
An Adaptation Fund (AF)
Bilateral and multilateral sources
CAPACITY FOR JI-CDM IN THE BALKAN REGION
Reliable and predictable rules are crucial for the development of the CDM and JI as
valuable tools.
Institutional infrastructure is needed that:
provides transparency and accountability,
fosters closer co-operation between energy and environment agencies, and
supports market activity.
Criteria for JI-CDM projects – The view of the NGO community
Funds should be provided in the form of grants rather than loans.
Projects should not be accepted for JI-CDM if they are commercially feasible.
Projects should not be accepted for JI-CDM if they only help to offset government
subsidies which encourage greenhouse gas emissions.
No projects should be approved which merely implement existing regulations.
Criteria for JI-CDM projects (continued)
JI-CDM projects should be in accordance with countries’ sustainable development strategies.
Environmental impact assessment should be carried out for all JI-CDM projects.
No nuclear projects should be approved.
No JI-CDM sink projects should be approved before the adoption of the IPCC methodology.
Full public access to information should be provided.
Baselines should be reviewed every 5 years.
Credits should be limited to 10 years.
No advance credits given.
Possibilities for using projects with fixed CO2 reduction should be used for comparison of
baselines.
No replacement of foreign aid should be allowed.
INTRODUCING NEW FINANCIAL TOOLS
The ESCO concept – Third Party Financing (TPF)
Tradable Green Certificates
Energy – CO2 Taxation
KEY STEPS TO BE TAKEN
Liberalization of energy markets guaranteeing at least three things:
Energy producers (either public or private) are given fair access to the grids.
Legislation (e.g. in the form of feed-in laws) is put in place guaranteeing fair and secured
prices for clean energy.
Clean renewable energy is given priority and incentives.
Political commitment and national targets for renewable energy as well as
greenhouse gas emissions reductions are needed within fixed timeframes.
Demand Side Management should be given priority and incentives, as energy
efficiency and savings are the best options for both the economy and the
environment.