Summary of Changes

Download Report

Transcript Summary of Changes

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES TO CHICKEN
STANDARDS
Consultation : October 2016
Red Tractor Standards : Keeping pace with changing times
At Red Tractor we know that our standards must be kept up to date.
With or without Brexit there will always be legal regulations and we
cannot afford to fall behind and new issues emerge in the minds of
shoppers who buy our products. So, we review our farm standards every
three years and are just launching proposals for the next update to come
into effect next year.
The changes will provide positive re-assurance on some key issues.
For the next few weeks we invite comments on the changes and we will
consider all the responses before finalising the standards early next year.
Red Tractor Standards : Keeping pace with changing times
Rodenticides and Environment Protection
Regulations came into force to seriously restrict the use of rodenticides
because of concerns that their use was damaging wild bird populations.
Under the regulations users must take further training or they will only
be able to buy rodenticides intended for amateur and domestic use.
However, government has accepted that Red Tractor members are
responsible users and should not face these restrictions. We are adding
some details to the standards to secure these benefits.
Our Crops standards have worked successfully with the Voluntary
Initiative for many years to avoid pesticide residues on crops and
pollution of the environment. We now propose to add simple
environment protection measures to some livestock standards.
Red Tractor Standards : Keeping pace with changing times
Biosecurity
We all know that outbreaks of disease can be devastating so we are proposing
some changes to make current policies on biosecurity even clearer, for example,
when using disinfectants. In the more intensive livestock sectors the focus will be
on access to the unit by people and visitors and their impact on biosecurity.
A key issue in recent press headlines has been the question of antimicrobial
resistance (AMR). Since Penicillin first came into use in the 1930s we have relied
on antibiotics in both human and veterinary medicine to treat a range of serious
infectious disease. Now there is a major worry that the pathogens are rapidly
getting resistant to them. Wild press reports that blame the entire problem on
the use of antimicrobials in farming are clearly misguided, however, we all have a
part to play to ensure responsible use. RUMA the alliance for Responsible Use of
Medicines in Agriculture co-ordinates the food supply chain on this topic and Red
Tractor is a long standing supporter of RUMA. UK practice is already good but we
will introduce some additions, in line with the latest RUMA guidance.
Red Tractor Standards : Keeping pace with changing times
Fresh Produce
Many crops such as salads and fruit can go from the field to table with no cooking
or processing. If the crop is contaminated in the field or during harvest there will
be nothing to prevent it causing illness when it’s eaten and fresh produce has
been the cause of a number of big outbreaks of illness in North America and on
mainland Europe. The track record of UK-grown produce has actually been very
good but we have still taken the opportunity to propose some improvements in
this area. We have drawn on information from the International ‘Codex’ fresh
produce guidance. Closer to home, the European Commission is just finalising its
own guidance on microbiological risks in fresh produce and it is gratifying that
they have used Red Tractor standards as the basis of some of their document. At
the same time we have drawn some points from their draft which we believe will
add further reassurance to the safety of Red Tractor salads.
David Clarke
CEO, Assured Food Standards
DOCUMENTS & PROCEDURES
Strengthened
DP.d To consider more issues when looking at new production sites (e.g.
distance from other poultry sites) in order to minimise the risk of
contracting disease/spread of disease with particular reference to Avian
Influenza
TRACEABILITY AND ASSURANCE STATUS
Strengthened
TI.a To require more information on the origin of chicks in order to ensure accurate
origin labelling of the final product
TI.b To require RT hatcheries only handle RT eggs thus reducing the risk of possible
pathogen transfer and ensuring the RT assurance chain is maintained
VERMIN CONTROL
Strengthened
VC.a Requiring vermin entry points are minimised
VC.b By detailing what we mean by “ bait” must be used responsibly
Additional
VC.b.1 Requiring that permanent baiting is evidence led and setting out how this
can be achieved
All ensure RT maintains its recognition by the Campaign for Responsible Rodenticide
Use (CRRU) as meeting its Code of Best Practice which promotes responsible
rodenticide use and reduces risks to non-target species
FEED AND WATER
Strengthened
FW.k Additional requirements have been added to ensure feeding equipment
used on and off farm is kept clean and therefore reduces the risk of
contamination
Additional
FW.k.1 A standard setting out how home grown wheat must be treated before
feeding to chicken in order to limit the introduction of Salmonella
BIOSECURITY AND DISEASE CONTROL
Strengthened
• BI.a By detailing the control measures that need to be in place to minimise disease entry
and spread. Control measure are based on HACCP principles
• BI.k By introducing an additional requirement for C&D of vehicles exiting farms and
specifying the disinfectants that can be used
Additional
• BI.a.1 To control unauthorised people entry and breaches of farm biosecurity
• BI.a.2 Recommendation to define farm boundaries and control entry and exit to farm
• BI.c.1 Ensures that new sites are designed so no personal vehicles enter the biosecure
area on farm
• BI.e.1 Prohibits the entry of personal objects such as wallets, cameras (which are difficult
to disinfect) into bird areas
The aim of all is to minimise the risks of disease spread and the risk of an AI outbreak
ANIMAL MEDICINES AND HUSBANDRY PROCEDURES
Strengthened
• AM.a Added a requirement to keep records of prescriptions and for them to be
available at RT assessments strengthens this standard
• AM.f.1 Changing the recording of antibiotics from Mg/kg LWt as the metric to
Mg/pcu. The VMD are going to require the figure as Mg/pcu when they have to
report usage to ESVAC so changing how farmers do it now will help embed this
reporting format
Additional
• AM.f.3 Prohibits the prophylactic use of antibiotics. RUMA define prophylactic use is
defined as ‘treatment of an animal or a group of animals, before clinical signs of
infectious disease, in order to prevent the occurrence of disease or infection’.
continued…..
ANIMAL MEDICINES AND HUSBANDRY PROCEDURES
• AM.f.4: Requires there is a documented vet’s justification available to demonstrate
antibiotics are only used when absolutely necessary to safeguard the welfare of the
animal
• AM.f.5: Prohibits the use of antibiotic groups that are critically important to human
health
• AM.f.6: Limits the use of fluoroquinolones and macrolides to treat disease as they
are critically important to human health
The aim of all is to help minimise the risk of antibiotic resistance to
humans and animals
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND CONTAMINATION CONTROL
Strengthened
• EC.a To require that injurious weeds are controlled in order to reduce the risk of
free range birds consuming them and getting sick. This is a legal requirement
• EC.c Requires more robust controls around all wastes, but in particular chemical
wastes e.g. empty PPP containers. All changes represent good practice for
environmental protection
• EC.d – Includes nematicides as a PPP and prohibits storing unapproved PPPs
• EC.f To include legislative requirements and good practice around the
application of PPPs
• EC.i.1 To require the calibration of PPP application equipment at least annually
thus ensuring accurate applications to protect the wider environment
• EC.m To not allow fertilisers or soil improvement product to be applied at high
risk times (e.g. water logged ground ) in order to minimise the risks of run off
/pollution
Continued …....
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND CONTAMINATION CONTROL
Additional
• EC.d.1 Reflects legislative and Cross Compliance requirements for the use of PPPs
e.g. PPPs must be appropriate for the use required, maximum permitted dose rates,
etc
• EC.g.2 Requires any spraying contractors used to be suitably qualified and registered
with a professional body for sprayers, the National Register of Sprayer Operators
(NRoSO) to ensure continuous professional development
• EC.g.3 Requires advisers on pesticides usage to have a BASIS Professional
Registration number. Where farmers are taking advice from external advisers it is
good practice that those advisers are suitably qualified
• EC.i.4 Is a legal requirement and requires that surplus spray mix is dealt with
responsibly
The aim of all is to reduce the risk of environmental contamination
DEPOPULATION
Strengthened
• DE.x.1 By the addition of “Controls must be” in order to ensure there is rigor around
the cleaning and disinfection of catching equipment and transport
• DE.y Ensures if catchers use their own company vehicle for breaks, that the farmer
has to ensure the vehicle is clean & disinfected on entry to the biosecure area
Both aim to reduce the risks of disease entry onto farm and spread