Medical Ethics & Human Experimentation
Download
Report
Transcript Medical Ethics & Human Experimentation
Medical Ethics &
Human
Experimentation
Backdrop to this Class
Many
aspects of medical ethics
Patient-physician encounter
Treatment
Experimental subjects
Limits to technology
All
are 19th & 20th century
developments
Previous
focus
ethical codes had different
Hippocratic
Oath
– Legitimate practice of learned physicians
– Less mention of patients
Do
no harm
Maintain confidentiality
Thomas
Percival: Medical Ethics
– Legimation strategy
AMA
Code of Ethics (1847)
– Restore medical legitimacy
– Obligation of patient to physcian
– Obligation of physician to colleagues
CMA
Code of Ethics (1867)
– Consolidate authority of regular
medicine
– Concerned about homeopathic medicine
Other
reality was that patients were
not regularly exposed to
experimentation prior to 19th century
Stagnation
of medical therapeutics
Old
theories rejected, but not the
therapeutics that accompanied them
Rejecting
old therapies tantamount
to admitting other medical sects
were more correct
Some
experimentation had occurred
Smallpox
Jenner’s
inoculation: 1721
work with smallpox vaccine
– No evidence of consent
Hospitals as Sites of Medical
Experimentation
Associated
with rise of the hospital
as site of medical treatment
Bad reputation
Confinement of infectious cases
Fears of experimentation by
unscrupulous physicians
Autopsy
used to improve diagnostic
accuracy
Feared by lay people
Associated with dissection
Primarily
a preoccupation of the
poorer classes
Rise of the Medical Laboratory
First emerged
19th century
Helped
in France in last half of
physicians understand how
diseases worked
Advanced medical therapeutics
Claude Bernard
(1813-1878)
Believed the lab
was the future of
medicine
“It is what we think
we know already
that prevents us
from learning”
Discovered
glycogenic function of the
liver
Pasteur built upon the reputation of
the lab as the new locus of medical
knowledge
Medical scientist replaced medical
clinician as the new model of medical
progress
Animal Experimentation
Much
knowledge was gained from
vivi-section
Used cats & dogs as experimental
subjects
Ways of procuring research animals
sometimes dubious
Opposition mounted
SPCA
formed in Britain in 1824
Became RSPCA in 1840
Began to oppose vivi-section after
development of anaesthesia in 1850s
Believed animals should be
aneasthetized, then euthanized
Opposed use of cats, dogs, horses
1874
Royal Commission
Lobby group set up led by Frances
Power-Cobbe
Had considerable popular support
– eg: George Bernard Shaw
Cobbe
continued to lobby for
abolition of animal experimentation
Frances PowerCobbe (18221904)
Wide-ranging
interests in
feminism, social
justice, animal
rights
Anti-vivisectionists
had complex
reasons for opposition to use of
animals
– Cruelty
– Feared it would blunt sensibilities of
young physicians
– Opened door to human experimentation
Another
Royal Commission in 1st
decade of 20th century
Human Experimentation
Also
problematic
19th century standards were quire
different
James Marion Sims
(1813-1883)
Celebrated as the
“founder of modern
gynecology”
Practiced in
Montgomery,
Alabama
Developed
a new surgical procedure
to repair vaginal fistulas
Result of long series of experiments
on black slaves
Did surgery without anaesthesia
Alleged that many women died
during his experiments
Sims’s
day
Similar
legacy controversial to this
problem with Pasteur’s work
with rabies vaccine
Medical Ethics in the 20th Century
Anti-vivisection
movement raised
consciousness of medical profession
Also aware animal models couldn’t
always work
Created set of rough guidelines for
human experimentation
Must
first, if possible, be tested on
animals
Physician willing to experiment on
self or family member
– Not always possible
Patient
demonstrate willingness to
submit to experiment
– Often signified by payment
Max
von Pettenkoffer opposed Koch’s
germ theory of cholera
Swallowed a sample of cholera bacilli
He lived
Yellow fever
experiments
As early as 1807, it
had been
suspected that
mosquitoes might
be vectors
Experimental work
by Carlos Finlay
(1833-1915) of
Cuba in 1870s
Published
paper in 1881
Hypothesized that it was mosquito
borne
Unable to experimentally
demonstrate the link
Spanish-American
war (1898)
Appalling mortality in American
troops
Walter Reed (18511902)
Arrived in Havana
after the war to
investigate
outbreaks of
typhoid fever
Moved on to yellow
fever
Two
arms to the research
– Disprove miasma theory
– Prove mosquito theory
No
animal models for the disease
existed
Forced to use human volunteers
Initial
experiments conducted on 2
members of the commission
Both contracted disease; one died
Tests on more volunteers
– Used written consent
– Paid participants
$100
for participating
$100 more if contracted disease
Payment
problematic
Changes motivation for volunteering
Documentation that some volunteers
cried when they were not selected
Other
late 19th & early 20th century
human experiments did not even
attain this level of consent
1891
Swedish experiments on
smallpox
Used children recruited from an
orphanage
Cheaper than calves
No
government regulation of human
experimentation
Britain had legislation re: animal
experimentation
US had neither
Resulted in experiments we would
deem unethical today
Experiment
in US leper colony
Test hypothesis that leprosy &
syphilis were same disease
6 girls with leprosy inoculated with
syphilis
Did not develop disease
Subsequently 12 more children
inoculated
Drug
toxicity tests on mental
patients
8 patients given increased doses and
responses documented
Justification: all were past the point
of recovery from their illness
Experiment
in Boston
Test diagnostic utility of lumbar
puncture
45 children at or near death
underwent procedure
Congressional
hearings on human
experimentation in 1916
No
bill passed
AMA refused to amend Code of
Ethics
Support for anti-vivisectionism &
human experimentation waned
Public more interested in successes
gained by these techniques
1922
discovery of insulin
Anxiety
about human
experimentation did not re-emerge
until after Second World War
Nuremburg
Code (1947)
AMA
adopted principle of informed
consent in 1946
Problems
with ethical human
experimentation continued
Tuskegee
1972)
syphilis experiment (1932-
Lobotomy
Compulsory
sterilization
What
can we learn from these
examples?