It never entered my head to be sacred

Download Report

Transcript It never entered my head to be sacred

ENG 626
CORPUS APPROACHES TO LANGUAGE STUDIES
language teaching (1)
Bambang Kaswanti Purwo
[email protected]
Hunston Ch. 5
application of corpora in language teaching
▪ production of dictionaries and grammars
▪ use of corpora in critical linguistics (the study of ideologies)
▪
in translation
▪ contribution of corpora to literary studies n stylistics
▪ use of corpora in forensic linguistics
▪ use of corpora in designing writer support packages
dictionaries and grammars
new emphases on
▪ frequency
▪ collocation and phraseology
▪ variation
▪ lexis in grammar
▪ authenticity
emphasis on frequency
▪ speaker intuition very little use
▪ important for dictionary users: which sense of a word
to show first
▪ [corpus can show the diversity of use] – more detailed
information about the words
comparison of senses between
▪ Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English 2nd 1987
▪ Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English 3rd 1995
▪ Collins COBUILD English Dictionary 1995
» KNOW
20-40-30
» MATTER 10-30-20
» MAY
7-8-15
» PLACE
20-30-30
 dictionaries not divide info between senses in consistent
ways
the increases number of senses – more info about the very
frequent ones
L 1987 matter ‘something wrong’ What’s the matter?
L 1995 + four more senses: asking about
illness or state of being broken
feelings
statement there’s something that the matter with
NEG statement there’s nothing the matter with
L 1987 I know ‘uttered when someone gets a sudden idea’
What can we get her for her birthday? Oh I know, we’ll
get her some flowers
L 1995 + two
‘given agreement’: I’m so worn out. Yeah, I know.
‘forestalling disagreement’ It sounds silly I know, but try it
anyway.
‘prefacing a disagreement’
‘showing sympathy n understanding’
frequency and grammar reference books
Mindt (2000) four meanings of the present perfect
(a) indefinite past
(b) past continuing into present
(c) recent past
(d) a use indicating that an action is completed,
though at an unspecified time
(a) 80% of occurrence
(b) second in rank
(c) and (d) are rare
in many course books: (b) and (c) prototypical
frequency can be linked to discourse
▪ the most frequent use of the in academic prose :
at the beginning of complex noun phrases
the disorientating effect of zero gravity
▪ the most frequent use of this and these in academic prose
to refer back to ideas previously mentioned
TELL and PROMISE most frequently used in:
▪ TELL “verb + indirect object + complement clause”
You can’t tell her to get off.
▪ PROMISE “verb + complement clause”
They promised to write.
▪ PROMISE frequent V intr. (I promise)
▪ TELL rarely (Time will tell)
▪ very infrequent uses can legitimately be ignored
Mindt (2000) reports 98% of verbs in the past tense refer to
past time
hypothetical future very rare
 Hypothetical meaning unimportant to teach?
It is important for learners to learn to express the hypothetical
in some context (e.g. what if ___)
▪ students learning the past tense can safely ignore
hypothetical future
▪ students learning to express hypotheticality cannot ignore
hypothetical future
[Hunston Ch. 6]
corpora  a new description of language
 the content of what the lang T is teaching is changing
what is language like?
• words tend to occur in preferred sequences
▪ not randomly or
▪ in accordance with grammatical rules only
language as phraseology
» collocation
utterly different, not: utterly similar
utterly ridiculous, not: utterly sensible
» phrases n variation
▪ open to considerable creativity and exploitation
where there’s smoke there’s fire
no smoke without fire
sometimes there is smoke without fire
» tendency for certain verbs to occur
▪ in passive rather than in active
Manchester is hemmed in by industrial areas
cf. industrial areas hem Manchester in
▪ in the negative rather than in the positive
It never entered my head to be sacred
cf. it entered my head to be sacred
» occurrence of complementation patterns
suggestion that, decision as to whether, obligation to do
three important consequences – challenge to current views
about language
▪ no distinction between pattern and meaning
▪ language: two principles of organization
▫ idiom principle
▫ open-choice principle
▪ can phraseology indeed be taken to be the basis of what
a learner needs to know?
▪ is phraseology simply an important adjunct to grammar?
• pattern and meaning
▪ a word [+ several senses], each sense diffrent set of patterns
mobile [used of things] ‘can be moved’: mobile unit/library
[used of people] ‘not prevented from moving by disability or lack of resources’: I’m still very mobile
MAINTAIN (verb) see Hunston p. 139
▪ relation between meaning n pattern is not one-to-one
▫ not to treat MAINTAIN as a single word w/ three meanings
(cf. traditional dictionaries)
▫ but to propose three phraseologies (each has its own meaning)
‘maintain something’
‘maintain that something is true’
‘maintain something at a level’
 phraseologies replace the word as the unit of vocabulary
teaching
L’s task more difficult: three instead of one lexical item to learn
L’s task simplified: each lexical item + info about its use
• other aspect of pattern/meaning association
words with the same pattern tend to share aspects of meaning