Transcript there

Lecture 16 It-Patterns and
Existential Sentence
Part 1. Use of it
Part 2. Existential Sentence
 Structural properties of existential
sentences
 Non-finite existential clauses
Part 1 Use of it
1.Empty it
2.Anticipatory it
3. Introductory it in cleft sentences
1. Empty it: non-referring it as formal subject
It is meaningless and is chiefly used as formal
subject in sentences denoting time, place,
distance, and atmospheric conditions.
It’s so quiet and peaceful here.
It’s quite a long way to the nearest town.
It seems as if we’ve known each other for
years.
You will catch it for breaking the glasses.
It has fared well with him.
 2. Anticipatory it
 commonly occurs in sentences with a nominal
clause as subject or object.
 It is important to study English grammar.
 It was lovely meeting you at last.
 It is remarkable that so few of the patients suffered
side effects.
 It was not known whether there was gold left in the
mine.
He made it clear that he didn’t want to speak to me.
 It was said he was innocent.
 It is believed the rebels are about to attack the
capital.
Whether they will come or not doesn’t
matter very much.
To be here with you this evening is a
great pleasure.
You were so kind to invite us.
He is quite likely to let you down.
I think a good idea would be to get up a
petition.
3. introductory it in cleft sentences
Cleft sentence defined
A cleft sentence is an emphatic
construction with non-referring it as
formal subject. It is so called because it
is formed by dividing a single statement
into two separate parts each with a verb
of its own. The general pattern of a cleft
sentence is as follows:
It + be + focal element + that- / whoclause
John gave Mary a handbag at Christmas.
It was at Christmas that John gave Mary a
handbag.
It might have been at Christmas that John
gave Mary a handbag.
Pat released the President’s illness to the
reporters at the party last night.
It was Pat who…
It was the president’s illness that…
It was to the reporters that …
It was at the party that…
It was last night that…
? It was released that Pat …
 Pseudo-cleft sentences
 A pseudo-cleft sentence is essentially
an SVC construction with a whatclause as subject.
 What John did was (to) give Mary a
handbag.
 What John gave Mary was a handbag.
 A handbag was what John gave Mary.
Part 2 Existential Sentences
1. Structural properties of existential sentences
 The existential sentence generally begins with an
unstressed there as formal subject followed by a form of
the verb be or other verb that is related to the notion of
existence. Following the verb is a noun phrase, which is
known as the “notional” or “real” subject as distinguished
from the formal subject, and the notional subject is
usually followed by a locative, or at times by a temporal
adverbial. Thus, the general pattern of an existential
sentence is as follows:
 There + be + NP + locative / temporal adverbial






1.1 Introductory there
Are there any people in the hall?
There are some people in the waiting room.
1.2 Notional subject
The notional subject, which is actually the
focus of information, is usually a noun phrase
with indefinite specific reference. The
determiners commonly occurring in this kind of
noun phrase include the indefinite article, the
zero article, and other indefinite determiners
such as some, any, no, several, many, much,
more, (a)few, (a)little, less another, a lot of,
plenty of, a number of, enough, as well as the
cardinal numerals.
Plenty of people are getting promotion.
= There are plenty of people getting promotion.





1.3 Predicator in existential sentence
The predicator or predicate verb of an existential
sentence is commonly a form of the verb be, finite
or non-finite, simple or perfective. The predicator
may also be realized by “modal + be / have been”
or “semi-auxiliary + be”, eg:
There can be very little doubt about his guilt.
There can’t have been much traffic so late at night.
There appears to be no doubt about it.
Apart from the verb be, there are at least there
classes of semantically-related verbs that can act
as predicator in an existential sentence.
There arose in his imagination visions of a world
empire.
Long, long ago, there lived six blind men in India.
1. A car was ready for us.
2. A man is sitting on that fence.
3. A student came to see you.
4. A good film will be on at the Rex next
week.
5. I’m sure that a mistake has been
made.
2. Non-finite existential clauses
 A non-finite existential clause is one whose
predicator is a non-finite verb phrase. There
are two types of non-finite existential clause:
 There to be / (to have been) + NP + locative /
temporal adverbial
There being / having been + NP +locative
/temporal adverbial







2.1 As prepositional complementation
Both forms can be used as prepositional
complementation. If the preposition is for , it usually
takes the “there to be ”form as complementation.
With other prepositions, the complementation
usually takes the “there being” form, eg:
They planned for there to be another meeting.
John was reying on there being another opportunity.
2.2 As object
This applies more often than not to the “there to be”
form.
There are only a limited number of verbs that can
take a “there to be”form as object. These verbs
include expect, mean, intend, want, like, prefer,
hate, etc, eg:
Members like there to be plenty of choice.
 2.3 As subject and adverbial
 As subject, the “there being” form is
commonly used, eg:
 There being a bus stop so near the house is
a great advantage.
 When the “there to be” form is used as
subject, it is introduced by for, eg:
 It was unusual for there to be so few people
in the streets.
 The “there being” form can also act as
adverbial, eg:
 There having been no rain, the ground was
dry
1. people don’t want ____ another car.
There’s now some hope of ____ a
settlement of the dispute.
They asked for ___ another meeting.
John planned on ____ another meeting.
People hate ___ queues everywhere.