R&D on silicon pixels and strips
Download
Report
Transcript R&D on silicon pixels and strips
R&D on silicon pixels and strips
Giuliana Rizzo
for the Pisa BaBar Group
SuperB WorkShop
Frascati-17 November 2006
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
1
CMOS MAPS
electronics &
interconnects
epitaxial layer
Principle of Operation:
• Electrons generated by the incident
particle in the undepleted epitaxial
layer move by thermal diffusion.
•
–
substrate
Q ~ 80 e-h/m -> Signal ~ 1000 e-
(~ 300 m thick)
Signal collected by the n-well/p-epi
diode
Advantages:
•
(~ 10 m thick)
Same substrate for detector-readout:
less material in the detection region
(thin down to ~ 50 um)
•
Sensor faster and more rad hard than
CCDs
•
CMOS deep submicron process
–
low power consumption and
fabrication costs
–
electronics intrinsically radiation
hard
G. Rizzo
Developed for imaging applications,
recently proven to work well also for
charged particles.
• Lots of MAPS R&D in many places
with a “conventional” approach:
•
->
->
•
Charge-to-voltage conversion
provided by sensor capacitance
small collecting electrode
small single pixel signal
Extremely simple in-pixel readout
configuration (3 NMOSFETs)
-> sequential readout
-> readout speed limitation
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
2
A new approach for CMOS MAPS
• Use of commercial triple-well CMOS process to address the
two previous limitations of conventional MAPS
– increase collecting electrode size
– increase the complexity of the in-pixel readout electronics
In triple-well processes a deep
n-well is used to provide Nchannel MOSFETs with better
insulation from digital signals
This feature exploited for a new approach in the design of CMOS pixels:
•
The deep n-well can be used as the collecting electrode
•
A full signal processing circuit can be implemented at the pixel level overlaying
NMOS transistors on the collecting electrode area:
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
3
Triple well CMOS MAPS
Standard processing chain for capacitive detector implemented at pixel level
•
Charge preamplifier used for Q-V
conversion:
–
SHAPER
DISC
LATCH
Gain is independent of the sensor
capacitance -> collecting electrode can be
extended to increase the signal
•
RC-CR shaper with programmable peaking
time (0.5, 1 and 2 s)
•
A threshold discriminator is used to drive
a NOR latch featuring an external reset
•
PRE
Fill factor = deep n-well/total n-well area 0.85
in the prototype test structures
Readout scheme compatible with existent architectures
for data sparsification at the pixel level -> improve
readout speed
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
4
First Results
• Prototype chip, with single
pixels, realized in 0.13 m
triple well CMOS process
(STMicrolectronics)
• Very encouraging results:
Noise only
(no source)
electrons
Landau
peak 80 mV
threshold
– Prove the principle
– Good agreements between
measurements and simulation
– S/N = 10 measured with
electrons from 90Sr b source
– Pixel noise still “high”
90Sr
saturation due
to low energy
particle.
1250
2200
3000 (e-)
• ENC = 125 e- for known reason
• Second version of the chip currently under test:
• Small pixel matrix (8x8, 50x50 m2 ) with simple sequential
readout.
• Improved noise performance: pixel noise ENC = 50 e– Expected S/N ~ 25
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
5
R&D Project
• Aim of our research program is to fabricate MAPS sensors,
based on triple well commercial CMOS process, and develop
the technology for the fabrication of thin silicon strip
detectors.
• Final goal is to build a prototype of a thin silicon tracker
(MAPS and thin silicon strip modules) with LV1 trigger
capabilities (based on Associative Memories)
– Already working on the design of the readout architecture for MAPS
matrix, with data sparsification at the pixel level, having in mind a
Linear SuperB as target application.
– Technology for thin silicon strips on a large area is not well
established. We will explore two alternatives: epitaxial grown
substrate and locally thinned high resistivity substrate.
– Important aspect of the project is to develop light mechanical and
cooling structures for thin silicon modules to benefit of the very low
material budget of the sensor itself.
• Test of the prototype tracker in a test beam in 2008
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
6
SLIM Collaboration
• This R&D project will be pursued in the next 3 years
within the new SLIM (Silicon detectors with Low
Interaction with Material) Collaboration, supported by
the INFN and the Italian Ministry for Education,
University and Research.
• The SLIM Collaboration is organized in 4 Work Packages
to cover the various aspects of the project:
–
–
–
–
WP1 “MAPS and Front End Electronics”
WP2 “Thin silicon strips”
WP3 “Trigger/DAQ”
WP4 “Integration, Mechanics and Test Beam”
• We have a quite detailed project plan
• Several Italian Institutes involved in the project:
– Pisa (coordination), Pavia, Bergamo,Trieste, Torino, Trento, Bologna
• Total Manpower involved ~ 12 FTE
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
7
Backup
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
8
Device Simulation (ISE-TCAD)
•
Detailed physical simulations performed using
ISE-TCAD software to:
– understand the charge collection mechanism and
its time properties
– study influence of neighboring pixel and n-wells
– optimize sensor design (needs 3D simulation, in
progress)
•
Preliminary results:
– Collected charge ~ 1500 e-
• assuming pepi thickness 15 m: likely to be true.
• Charge collection drops rapidly out of deep nwell
area
– Collection time: ~50 ns
Uncertainties about process:
Test structure chip realized to measure some
process parameters -> a crucial input for simulation
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
9
Test Chip Layout
0.13 m CMOS HCMOS9GP by STMicroelectronics: epitaxial, triple well
process (available through CMP, Circuits Multi-Projets)
channel 5 - pixel
with input pad for
charge injection
(830 m2 collecting
electrode area)
Single devices
channel 1-2-5 have
integrated injection
capacitance for
readout electronics
characterization
channel 6 - pixel
with small (830 m2)
collecting electrode
area
channel 3- pixel with
medium (1730 m2)
collecting electrode
area
channel 4 - pixel with
large (2670 m2)
collecting electrode
area
channel 1 - pixel
with input pad for
charge injection
channel 2 - pixel
with input pad for
charge injection
(100 fF detector
simulating
capacitance)
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
10
Gain & Noise Measurements
•
Charge sensitivity and Equivalent Noise Charge measured in the three
channels with integrated injection capacitance Cinj
•
Good agreement (~10%) with the post layout simulation results (PLS)
120
250
- + 425e /pF
ENC11e
= 11e
ENC=
+425e- /pF
200
Gain~440 mV/fC
Measurements
100
-
80
ENC [e- rms]
V
peak
[mV]
PLS
448 mV/fC
t =1 s
P
60
431 mV/fC
40
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Channel 5
t =1 s
150
P
100
Channel 2
50
Channel 5
20
-
0
0
50
Channel 1
100
150
Q [e-]
200
250
300
350
C [fF]
in
T
•
Equivalent Noise Charge is linear with CT=CD+CF+Cinj+Cin
•
Sensor capacitance higher than initially expected: noise performance
greatly affected. Room for improvement in next chip submission
(CD=detector capacitance, CF=preamplifier feedback capacitance, Cin=preamplifier input capacitance)
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
11
Response to infrared laser
•
Infrared laser used to emulate charge
released by particle
–
=1060 nm absorption coefficient=10 cm-1 in Si pixel
can be back illuminated
•
Total charge released equivalent to ~ 6 MIPs
•
Charge released in a broad region under the
sensor: fraction of the charge collected by
pixel depends on the laser spot intensity
profile (not well known yet)
shaper output [V]
0.02
0
-0.02
Channel 3
•
Largest charge collected in the
largest pixel.
•
Charge does not scale linearly
laser spot larger than the pixel
area and with non uniform profile
•
Results roughly compatible with a
gaussian laser spot profile of
about 50 m …
Channel 4
-0.04
Channel 6
-0.06
t =1 s
-0.08
-0.1
-5
G. Rizzo
P
0
5
10
t [s]
15
20
25
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
12
Calibration with
•
Soft X-ray from 55Fe source used
to calibrate pixel noise and gain in
channels with no injection
capacitance
55Fe
X-ray
Peak value of the shaper output:
• blue - 55Fe source (5.9 keV)
• green - No source (same acquisition time)
=105 mV
=12 mV
INCIDENT
PHOTONS
PWELL
NWELL
Charge
only
partially
collected
by single
pixel
Charge
entirely
collected
PWELL
DEPLETION
REGION
P- EPI-LAYER
P++ SUBSTRATE
• 5.9 keV line 1640 e/h pairs:
1640
2200
3000 (e-)
• with charge entirely collected clear peak @ 105 mV -> gain=400 mV/fC
• below 100 mV excess w.r.t. noise events <- charge only partially collected
• Using 55Fe gain calibration: pixel noise 8 mV
ENC=125 e-
• Signal
from simulation SuperB
1500 WorkShop
eS/N expected = 12
G. Rizzo
– 17 November 2006
13
Response to 90Sr electrons
eScintillator
Pixel
Sr e 90
39Y
90
39
15% die in Si
Si chip 300 um
Sr-90 beta spectrum
0.035
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
45% are ~ M.I.P:
Landau peak
Sr90
Y90
0
90Sr
90
Y e 40
Zr
90
38
dN/dE
Response to M.I.P from 90Sr beta
source used to measure S/N ratio
0.5
1
1.5
2
40% release more than a
M.I.P, they deform Landau
shape or saturate the shaper
beta source
2.5
Ek (MeV)
Acquisition triggered by coincidence
scintillator & pixel signal above
threshold (set @ ~0.5 MIP)
dE/dx Mev/g/cm2
10.00
1.00
Setup not easy as it seems: you need to fire a
single pixel ~30x30 m2 !
G. Rizzo
0.0
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
0.5
1.0
1.5
Ek MeV
2.0
2.5
Series1
14
Response to 90Sr electrons
•
Landau peak clearly visible
@80 mV
•
Using M.I.P signal from
and average pixel noise
Peak value of the shaper output:
• blue - 90Sr beta source
• green - No source
90Sr
Landau peak 80 mV
S/N=10
•
Using gain measured with
M.I.P most probable energy
loss corresponds to about
1250 e-
•
Fair agreement with sensor
simulation: 1500 e- expected
for pepi layer thickness 15
m. Hint on the process
secrets!
saturation due
to low energy
particle.
55Fe,
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
1250
2200
3000 (e-)
15
Second chip layout
Pixel
Matrix
G. Rizzo
Single
Pixel
channels
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
16
G. Rizzo
SuperB WorkShop – 17 November 2006
17