Technical Highlights 2016

Download Report

Transcript Technical Highlights 2016

U.S. Department of Energy
Radiological and Environmental
Sciences Laboratory
Anita Bhatt
Shane Steidley
DOE Radiological and Environmental
Sciences Laboratory
ASP Meeting 2016
Sept. 19, 2016
MAPEP Program Description
 Assures the quality, accuracy and defensibility of environmental
analytical measurements.
 Ensures valid analytical data which is critical to worker and
environmental protection for minimizing DOE’s liability and risk
 Evaluates analytical work based on performance.
 Addresses specific analytical issues routinely encountered that
affect the accuracy of the results.
 Tests the accuracy of analytical procedures on a variety of real
samples being submitted to DOE for analysis.
2
MAPEP Programmatic Updates
 Ongoing funding efforts to sustain current program
and manage inflationary cost growth
 Suspension or elimination of participants and selected
PT matrices
 Technical Highlights for 2016
3
Budgetary Impacts to MAPEP
 Suspension of the following PT areas:
 International Participation
 Organic PT (OrW and OrS)
 Gross alpha/beta (GrW and GrF)
 Sr-89/90 Air Filter
 No special request PT samples
 No remedial samples related to Priority 1 findings
 Must wait for the next MAPEP test session
4
Technical Highlights 2016
5
MAPEP Series 34 & 35
by the Numbers
MAPEP Test Session
Series 34 Series 35
Dates Shipped
March 2016 Sept. 2016
Laboratories Participating
127
79
Domestic
85
79
International
42
0
664
336
Proficiency Testing Standards Shipped
6
Lost International
Participation
Lab Name
Health Services Support Agency, Forensic Sci. Services
Country
AUSTRALIA
Lab Name
ZVD Institute of Occupational Safety
Country
SLOVENIA
International Atomic Energy Agency
AUSTRIA
RadioAnalysis, South Africa Nuclear Energy Corp.
Supreme Council for Environment
BAHRAIN
CIEMAT-(Radiation Protection Laboratory)
SPAIN
Instituto de Radioprotecao e Dosimetria - IRD/CNEN
Departamento Ingeniería Nuclear y Mecánica de Fluidos
SPAIN
Health Canada Radiation Protection Bureau
CANADA
Laboratori de Radiologia Ambiental-Universitat de Barcelona
SPAIN
Radiation Protection Bureau RSD NMS
CANADA
LARUEX Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory
SPAIN
Radiation Protection Service
CANADA
Radiactividad Ambiental y Vigilancia Radiologica
SPAIN
EGYPT
University of La Laguna FISICA Medica
SPAIN
Soreq NRC
ISRAEL
Lab Radiactividad Ambiental. Univ. Politecnica Valencia
Chemical and Physical Analysis Laboratories Directorate
JORDAN
Tunisia- Radioanalytical Laboratory
TUNISIA
Research Laboratories and Information Directorate
Royal Scientific Society, Environmental Instrumental Analysis Laboratory
JORDAN
JORDAN
Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Radioecology Laboratory
NAS Radiochemistry Group
TURKEY
UK
Research Laboratories and Information Directorate
JORDAN
Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards
UK
Energy and Mineral Regulatory Commission
JORDAN
Chemistry Support Services
UK
Laboratories and Quality Affairs Jordan
JORDAN
Environmental Scientifics Group
UK
Royal Scientific Society - Radiation Protection Lab
JORDAN
UniTech Services Group, Ltd
UK
Ministry Of Health,Radiation Protection Department Lab
KUWAIT
PHE, CRCE Scotland
UK
KUWAIT
Radiation and ICP-Plasma Laboratories
Physics Department Radiological Lab
BRAZIL
SOUTH AFRICA
SPAIN
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
UK
Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission - Environmental Radiation
LEBANON
LGC Ltd
UK
Asia Lab (M) Sdn. Bhd.
MALAYSIA
Public Health England
UK
MOROCCO
National Center for Nuclear Energy, Sciences and Techniques
Materials Assessment and Health Physics Group
UK
UniTech Services B.V.
NETHERLANDS
National Oceanography Centre, Southampton
UK
Environmental Radioactivity - National Centre for Radiation Science
NEW ZEALAND
Cavendish Nuclear Limited
UK
Foods and Water Laboratories Center
OMAN
AMEC Foster Wheeler - Analytical Services
UK
Arab Center for Engineering Studies
QATAR
Abu Dhabi Quality and Conformity Council-Central Testing Lab
QATAR
Emirates Nuclear Energy Corp (ENEC) Environmental Radiochemistry Lab UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Qatar University- Nuclear Physics Lab
Babcock Marine (Rosyth) Ltd.
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
SCOTLAND
7
Even Uranium Forms
Insoluble Compounds
8
Technical Assistance
 MAPEP provided technical assistance with sample dissolution
techniques.
U-234 Bias
Lab 1 Lab 2 Lab 3 Lab 4 Lab 5 Lab 6 Lab 7
MaS 30
-63%
-62%
-64%
-68%
-62%
-65%
-61%
MaS 31
-3.8%
4.9%
-25.9%
-7.6%
1.7%
-13.1%
-0.8%
9
MaS33 Pu-239/240
MAPEP-15-MaS33: Pu-239/240
Laboratory Results
Reference Value 80.4
120
Conc. (Bq/kg)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Lab Code
10
Sr-89/90 Air Filter
Activity Ratio
Sr-89/90
SrF31
12
SrF32
45
SrF33
4
11
MaW34 Ra-226
13 Not Acceptable
19 Acceptable
12
MaW34 Ra-226 by Gamma & Alpha
Spectrometry
13
Special Radiological Matrix
XrM for Series 33 & 34
 Special Radiological Matrix (XrM)
 Non punitive, promote increased scientific capability, …
 Undisclosed sample matrix and radionuclides.
 Results are only evaluated based on bias from the known.
 Acceptance flags are not assigned to the results.
 To test analytical capabilities.
14
Special Radiological Matrix (XrM)
 Full ‘suite’ of nuclides
 Real World Matrices
• Concrete
• Asphalt
15
XrM Reporting Summary
127 Total MAPEP Laboratory’s
 Perceived demand for special material?
 Only 28% participation?
 Only 10 laboratory’s reported alpha emitters?
 Poor capability or lack of interest?
16
XrM33 Ir-192
Cement
Labs
17
XrM33 Cm-244
Cement
18
XrM34 Uranium-234
Asphalt
19
XrM34 Plutonium-239
Asphalt
20
XrM34 Ra-226
by Gamma Spectrometry
21
Co-57 False Positive Testing
Eu-152 & Se-75 Interferences
22
Co-57 vs. Eu-152
23
Co-57 vs. Se-75
24
Assessing Analytical
Laboratory Performance
 NIST Traceable Standards – Performance Based
 Internal and External
 Chemical Methods
 Dissolution of Insoluble and Refractory Compounds
 Proper Use of Tracers and Internal Standards
 Personnel
 Knowledge and Ability
 Technique / Subtleties to the Chemical Procedure
25
Duplicate Samples Should Never
be Used to Evaluate Laboratory Performance
50000
•
45000
15 min
Cs-137
"Duplicate" for H-3 Analysis
40000
35000
Counts
30000
25000
20000
Co-60
Co-60
15000
10000
5000
0
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Channel
26
Duplicate Samples Should Never
be Used to Evaluate Laboratory Performance
60 min
"Duplicate" for Sr-90 Analysis
Co-60
Co-60
Counts
10000
9500
9000
8500
8000
7500
7000
6500
6000
5500
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Cs-137
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Channel
27
DOE Expects Quality Results
“High bias to the Pu-239/240 results are expected”
“Attempts to remove this Po-210 interference on these samples in the past have
been unsuccessful. Thus, the results are submitted without further qualifications.”
28
Summary
 MAPEP continues to identify and solve analytical/laboratory
problems that are otherwise difficult to recognize before they
become a DOE liability.
 Tests the accuracy and reliability of analytical procedures on a
variety of real samples being submitted to DOE for analysis.
 Addresses specific analytical issues routinely encountered that
affect the accuracy of the results.
 MAPEP is a federal oversite program that is critical in assuring
consistent and reliable laboratory data.
29
Websites and Contact Information
 RESL: http://www.id.energy.gov/resl/
 MAPEP: http://www/id.energy.gov/resl/mapep
 Anita R. Bhatt, RESL Director: 208-526-1273, [email protected]
 David Sill, Sr. Technical Manager Chemistry: 208-526-8031, [email protected]
 Guy Marlette, MAPEP Coordinator: 208-526-2532, [email protected]
30