Logical Fallacies

Download Report

Transcript Logical Fallacies


Logical fallacies are arguments that don’t work
 They seem convincing, but fail under close examination

What do logical fallacies do?






Oversimplify
Assume
Fail to provide evidence
Make jumps in logic
Divert attention from the real issues
OVERALL: They damage your ethos

Imagine you’re a reader with an opposing view
 What points would you criticize?

Bad words: always, never, and everyone
 Sweeping generalizations lead to overstating a case

Generalization. A conclusion about an entire group
based on a sample that’s neither large enough nor truly
representative.
 Having met several Texans, I can tell you that they are all
outgoing.

Non sequitur. No clear connection between a conclusion
and its support. Latin for “it does not follow.”
 Congress will surely approve the education bill, since they
already passed the voting reform bill.
 Rabbits are a symbol of the American Dream because Lennie
and George work on a ranch.

Forced Hypothesis. The explanation is forced because
there’s not enough evidence. It often ignores
alternative explanations or counter-arguments.
 Ex. Everyone clapped after Sophia’s recital, so she must be an
excellent pianist.

Slippery Slope. You cannot permit something because it
leads to extreme consequences.
 Ex. If we allow the government to legalize marijuana, it will
next legalize cocaine and heroin. Before long, our kids will all
be addicted to hard drugs.

Begging the Question or Circular Reasoning. The claims
of an argument assume the conclusion is true.
 Ex. Using a cell phone while driving is hazardous, so it should
be completely outlawed.
▪ This argument doesn’t offer proof that driving while using a phone is
dangerous, but simply asserts that it is and expects readers to agree.

Red Herring. An irrelevant topic is introduced, diverting
attention from the relevant debate.
 Ex. The government cannot begin to improve education until
it balances the budget.

Straw Man. An argument that distorts the opposition.
 Ex. People who oppose this education bill want us to go back
to the age of one-room school houses. Obviously, we live in a
different era.
▪ The author exaggerates the opposing side’s position, creating a “straw
man.” A man made of straw is easy to defeat.

Ad Populum. An argument that appeals to an audience’s
presumed shared values. Latin for “to the people.”
 Ex. As good Texans, we want what’s best for our beloved state,
which is why we can all agree that Cowboy Bob is the best
candidate for governor.