Radionuclide Sorption to Volcanic Tuff in the Presence of
Download
Report
Transcript Radionuclide Sorption to Volcanic Tuff in the Presence of
Sorption of Radionuclides to
Tuff in the Presence of
Shewanella oneidensis (MR-1)
Sherry Faye1, Jen Fisher2, Duane
Moser2, Ken Czerwinski1
1 University of Nevada, Las Vegas Radiochemistry PhD Program
2 Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV
Outline
Objective, Background and Goals
Experimental
Influence of bacteria on radioelement sorption
Tuff characterization
Bacteria preparation
Sorption
Results
Conclusions
Future directions
Research Objectives
Obtain data on sorption kinetics, equilibrium and
fundamental surface interactions of
radionuclides with tuff.
Obtain a better understanding of interactions of
the Shewanella oneidensis (MR-1) culture with
tuff and radionuclides.
Background
Studies from literature include:
Radionuclide sorption to various rock and minerals.
Interactions of radionuclides with bacteria.
Combined systems including rocks and minerals,
radionuclides and bacteria.
A combined system will be studied based on
conditions at the Nevada Test Site.
Determine if bacteria can influence sorption.
Use results to evaluate against environmental
conditions
Research Goals
Characterize tuff.
Use scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examine
surface morphology.
Use energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) to
determine elemental composition.
Use X-ray diffraction (XRD) for phase identification.
Perform sorption studies with radionuclides in
the absence and presence of bacteria.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Si, O, Al, K, Na
Tuff, 50X
X-ray Diffraction
Sanidine
KAlSi3O8
Cristobalite
SiO2
α-Quartz
SiO2
Bacteria Background
MR-1 can be found in
diverse environments.
MR-1 can grow with or
without oxygen and can
use a variety of alternate
electron acceptors.
Well known for its metal
reduction capabilities.
Courtesy of Jen Fisher
Preparation of MR-1 Cultures
Stock cultures stored
at -80° C in glycerol
are thawed on ice
Cells pelleted
(centrifuged @
3500 rpm for 15 min)
Plated on Luria
Bertani agar
Cells resuspended
with PO4- and
CO3- free buffer
Single colony picked and
grown 24 h in liquid LB
to density of ~109
cells/mL
1 mL (~109 cells) added
to FEP tubes
Courtesy of Jen Fisher
Sample Composition
Prepare solution phase
Radionuclide
Buffer
pH range 6 to 8
Dilutant – up to 20 mL DI
Add tuff
50 – 100 Bq mL-1 241Am
50 – 200 Bq mL-1 233U
Select particle size 500 – 600 μm
Select fraction of solid phase (Bq g-1)
Solution to solid ratio
Batch Experiments
Vortex for 2 minutes.
Centrifuge samples for 2 minutes.
Time based on previous kinetic studies
Liquid scintillation counting (100 μL into 10 mL
liquid scintillation cocktail).
Collect samples every 10-15 minutes for the first
two hours.
* All samples were created in 50 mL FEP centrifuge tubes
RESULTS
Results –
241Am
Samples contain:
Solution phase:
100 or 200 Bq mL-1 241Am
NaHCO3 to obtain a pH of ~8
20 mL total volume, adjusted with DI
Solid phase:
1 gram tuff, ground to 500-600 μm
Equilibrium Results –
241Am
100 Bq/mL
200 Bq/mL
120
100
% Sorbed
80
60
40
20
0
0
50
100
Time (h)
150
200
Kinetics Results –
241Am
100 Bq/mL
200 Bq/mL
120
100
% Sorbed
80
60
40
20
0
0
0.5
1
Time (h)
1.5
2
Results –
241Am
with MR-1
Nine samples, each had 20 mL of solution phase
adjusted to pH 7 with NaOH. Bacteria were
present in 5 samples ~ 1E+08 cells mL-1:
Concentration (Bq/mL)
Mass Tuff (g)
Am:tuff (Bq/g)
50
0
---
50
10
100
50
4
250
50
2
500
100
2
1000
Results –
241Am
with MR-1
100 Bq/g
No Bacteria
10^8 cells/mL
100
% Sorbed
80
60
40
20
0
0
0.5
1
Time (h)
1.5
2
Results –
241Am
with MR-1
500 Bq/g
No Bacteria
10^8 cells/mL
80
70
% Sorbed
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
0.5
1
Time (h)
1.5
2
Results –
233U
To determine ideal conditions for sorption
kinetic studies:
Concentration (Bq/mL) Mass Tuff (g)
Buffer
U:tuff (Bq/g)
NaHCO
100
1
3
2000
100
1
NaOH
2000
NaHCO
50
10
3
75
50
10
NaOH
75
Kinetics Results –
233U
75 Bq/g NaOH
2000 Bq/g NaOH
75 Bq/g NaHCO3
2000 Bq/g NaHCO3
100
% Sorbed
80
60
40
20
0
0
0.5
1
Time (hours)
1.5
2
Kinetics Results –
233U
Six samples were created to obtain kinetics and
equilibrium data, all contained 20 mL solution
phase and had a pH of ~7 using NaOH:
Concentration (Bq/mL)
Mass Tuff (g)
U:tuff (Bq/g)
50
10
75
62.5
5
250
125
5
500
125
2.5
1000
187.5
2.5
1500
100
1
2000
Results –
233U
75 Bq/g
500 Bq/g
1500 Bq/g
250 Bq/g
1000 Bq/g
2000 Bq/g
100
% Sorbed
80
60
40
20
0
0
0.5
1
Time (h)
1.5
2
Results –
233U
with MR-1
Six samples, each had 20 mL of solution phase
adjusted to pH 7 with NaOH:
Concentration (Bq/mL)
Mass Tuff (g) Bacteria (cells/mL)
100
1
0
100
0
1010
100
1
104
100
1
106
100
1
108
100
1
1010
Results –
233U
with MR-1
No Bacteria
10^4
10^8
No Tuff
10^6
10^10
100
% Sorbed
80
60
40
20
0
0
0.5
1
Time (hour)
1.5
2
CONCLUSIONS
AND FUTURE WORK
Conclusions
Quick sorption kinetics were obtained for 241Am
and 233U.
Sorption of 233U affected by carbonate formation
when using NaHCO3 as a buffer.
Sorption of 241Am and 233U to MR-1/growth
medium.
Future Work
Repeat 241Am and 233U sorption in the presence
of bacteria with replicates.
Perform sorption experiments in the presence of
bacterial growth medium and absence of MR-1
Repeat sorption experiments with other
radionuclides of interest.
Tc, Np, Pu
Acknowledgements
Richard Gostic
Megan Bennett
Dr. Ralf Sudowe
Dr. Thomas Hartmann
Tom O’Dou and Trevor Low
Funding provided by DOE/EPSCoR Partnership
Grant DE-FG02-06ER46295
UNLV Radiochemistry
Extra Slides
Results –
241Am
with MR-1
1000 Bq/g
No Bacteria
10^8 cells/mL
100
% Sorbed
80
60
40
20
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time (h)
2.5
3
3.5
Results –
241Am
with MR-1
250 Bq/g
No Bacteria
10^8 cells/mL
100
% Sorbed
80
60
40
20
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time (h)
2.5
3
3.5
Equilibrium Results –
233U
75 Bq/g NaOH
75 Bq/g NaHCO
3
2000 Bq/g NaOH
2000 Bq/g NaHCO
100
3
% Sorbed
80
60
40
20
0
0
50
100
Time (hours)
150
200