Asymmetric Information
Download
Report
Transcript Asymmetric Information
ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
Managerial Economics
Jack Wu
NTUC INCOME: PREMIUMS FOR $200,000
LIFE INSURANCE
female
male
civil servant group policy
• maximum coverage limit
• no medical exam
$240
$240
individual policy
• no maximum coverage
• medical exam required
$991
$1849
IMPERFECT/ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
imperfect information – absence of certain
knowledge (uncertainty)
asymmetric information -- one party has better
information than the other
party with worse information also suffers from
imperfect information
RISK
uncertainty about benefit or cost
arises from imperfect information
risk-averse person prefers certain payment to
uncertain payments with same expected value
risk-averse person will buy insurance
WINE MARKET EQUILIBRIUM, I
Price (Hundred $ per case)
8
supply of good vintage
7
combined supply of good and bad vintage
5
actual demand
(marginal benefit)
demand (marginal benefit)
for good vintage
3
2
0
1
2
3
Quantity (Thousand cases a month)
8
WINE MARKET EQUILIBRIUM, II
actual demand = combined supply of good and
bad
at equilibrium price
actual marginal benefit (adjusted for prob of getting
bad vintage) = price
actual marginal cost (of good vintage) = price
ADVERSE SELECTION
economic inefficiency
possible market failure
MARKET FAILURE, I
Price (Hundred $ per case)
8
combined supply of good
and bad vintages
actual demand
(marginal benefit)
2
0
demand (marginal benefit)
for good vintage
c
d
F
Quantity (Thousand cases a month)
8
MARKET FAILURE, II
conventional market: when supply exceeds
demand, lower price restores equilibrium
wine market with adverse selection: lower price
drives out better vintages, leaving even worse
adverse selection
LIFE INSURANCE, I
Coverage = $200,000 for 43 year-old male
NTUC Income
Singapore
Pacific Century
Hong Kong
Group policy
$240
$212
Individual (nonsmoker)
$1849
$466
Individual (smoker)
$1849
$1120
LIFE INSURANCE, II
group policy avoids adverse selection
individual policy attracts adverse selection
no maximum policy coverage
medical examination required
APPRAISAL
characteristic is objectively verifiable
potential gain covers appraisal cost
SCREENING
• less informed party indirectly elicits
other party’s characteristic through
structured choice
• better informed party must be
differentially sensitive to the choice
WHO’S THE REAL MOTHER?
Solomon: “Divide the living child into two, and give
half to the one, and half to the other.”
Woman whose son was alive: “give her the living
child, and by no means slay it.”
Other woman: “It shall be neither mine nor yours;
divide it.”
INDIRECT SEGMENT DISCRIMINATION
restricted vis-a-vis unrestricted air fares
separate cable channels vis-à-vis bundle
cents-off coupons
MULTIPLE ASYMMETRIES
screening mechanisms may conflict
example -- auto insurance policy: higher
deductible
screens out bad drivers
screens out more risk-averse
AUCTION
auctions to sell: seller doesn’t know buyers’
valuations
auctions to buy: buyer doesn’t know sellers’
costs
use competitive pressure to force bidders to
reveal their information
AUCTION METHODS
open/sealed bidding
discriminatory/non-discriminatory pricing
reserve price
WINNER’S CURSE
In auction to buy: winning bidder over-estimates
the true value
In auction to sell: winning bidder underestimates the true cost
More severe where
more bidders
true value/cost more uncertain
sealed-bid auction
SIGNALING
• better informed party communicates
characteristic through signal
• cost of signal differs according to
characteristic self-selection signal
is credible
SIGNALING: EXAMPLES
auto manufacturers – extended warranty
Intuit – money-back guarantee on Quicken
U.S. publicly-listed companies -- dividends
ADVERTISING AS A SIGNAL
advertising expenditure must be sunk
buyers must be able to detect poor quality
information about poor quality must quickly
spread and cut into seller’s future business
CONTINGENT CONTRACT
Payment is contingent on realized characteristic:
international trade -- buyback (supplier of
technology must buy future product)
mergers and acquisitions – payment in shares
CONTINGENT FEE
Lawyer has better information about likelihood of
success at trial
contingent fee
time-based fee
DISCUSSION
This question applies the technique for deriving a market
equilibrium with adverse selection presented in the math
supplement. Suppose that the demand for genuine
antiques is D = 4 - p, and the supply is S = p - 2, where D
and S are in thousands of units a month, and p represents
price in hundreds of dollars. In addition, some sellers
produce 500 fakes at zero marginal cost.
In a market of purely genuine antiques, what will be (i)
the buyers' marginal benefit from a quantity Q, (ii) the
sellers' marginal cost of providing a quantity Q, (iii) the
market equilibrium price and quantity.
In a market including both genuine antiques and fakes,
what will be (i) the buyers' marginal benefit from a
quantity Q, (ii) the sellers' marginal cost of providing a
quantity Q, (iii) the market equilibrium price and
quantity.