Transcript Slide 1

Learning and memory in Aplysia
Review: one method of learning mediated by presynaptic spike broadening
Presynaptic facilitation by stimulation
Presynaptic facilitation by serotonin
application
Presynaptic facilitation by cAMP injection
Model: Serotonin mediates presynaptic spike broadening
Associative learning: Differential conditioning produces more presynaptic facilitation
Reduced experimental preparation
Results:
•CS+ greatly enhanced
•CS- modestly enhanced
•Compared to CS+ and US-only (sensitization).
•Keep in mind that this fig is highlighting EPSP changes in MNs. SN
spike broadening is present but not evident in the fig.
Experimental procedures
Correlating brain (at the level of synaptic facilitation) and behavior
•Pairing greatly enhances synaptic
facilitation relative to sensitization (US only)
•Thus sensitization affects facilitation but
associative processes appears amplified
relative to sensitization.
•Is it the same molecular process that is
just ramped up?
Co-activation mediated by SNs (CS) and serotonin from INs (via US) mediates
associative effects
•AKA activity-dependent presynaptic facilitation
•Ca+ influx from CS stimulation
binds to CM which binds to
adenylyl cyclase and amps cAMP
production
•No Ca+, CM
does not bind
•Thus enhancement is dependent on coordinated
activity produced from both the CS+ and the US
•This is a mechanism for CS-US coincidence detection
Is presynaptic facilitation really presynaptic?
•Well yes but its all relative because the presynaptic element is
associated with the postsynaptic side of an axo-axonic synapse with
the FAC
What about the Post synaptic side?
•N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors
•An excitatory but conditional glutamate receptor
•Require glutamate and that the cell is depolarized to open
•Provides another mechanism for CS-US coincidence detection
X
No CS
O
CS present
Depolarized cell (due to CS)
frees Mg++ from NMDA
receptor allowing glutamate
to act.
Establishing NMDA as a post synaptic player
Experimental paradigm
•G1 Standard forward paring
•G2 forward pairing plus blockade of NMDA
with APV (receptor antagonist)
•G3/G4 CS-only and CS-only plus APV
•CS presented only in test phases for G3/G4.
Results: MN EPSP enhancement is blocked by APV
The fact that the CS+ effects are
blocked by APV suggests that both
pre and post synaptic changes are
necessary for learning to be
manifest.
Combining pre and postsynaptic facilitation into one model
Presynaptic effects (1):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
US mediates 5HT
Activates adenylyl cyclase
convert ATP to cAMP
Results in increased PKA activity
Which decreases K+ efflux
and spike broadening
Presynaptic effects (2):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
CS mediates Ca influx
Activates calmodulin
Enhances adenylyl cyclase
Ramps up conversion of ATP to cAMP
Results in ramping of PKA
Which leads to decreased K+ efflux
and spike broadening
Post synaptic effects
1. NMDA receptors open via
combined glutamate reception
from SN (CS) and depolarization
from depolarization caused by
the US
But do these changes last? Evidence of Long term memory
Behavior lasts
Facilitation lasts
Short vs long term facilitation may depend on where serotonin is received
•When serotonin is applied to axon
terminal facilitation is short term
•When serotonin is applied to soma
terminal facilitation is long term
Results suggest 5HT-mediated gene
regulation
Nuclear transcription mediated by PKA phosphorylation CREB
CRE = cAMP response element
CREB= cAMP response element binding protein
PKA must trans locate to nucleus: this implies that there
must be a surplus of PKA coming from terminals or it is
generated near the soma (or both).
•Phosphorylated CREB initiates immediate early
genes which can initiate a cascade of other late
response genes to be transcribed
•Adding foreign CREs (as a competitive
antagonist of endogenous CRE) reduces the
effect of nuclear PKA hence blocks 5HT
effects.
•Amplifying nuclear PKA enhances
sensitivity to 5HT.
Learning-mediated gene expression results in long term changes in axonal and
dendritic connectivity/complexity