Chapter Two Research Methods

Download Report

Transcript Chapter Two Research Methods

Chapter Two
Research
Methods
This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law:
•Any public performance or display, including transmission of any image over a network;
•Preparation of any derivative work, including the extraction, in whole or in part, of any images
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007
•Any rental, lease or lending of the program.
• ISBN: 0-131-73180-7
How Do
Psychologists
Develop New
Knowledge?
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007
Operational Definitions
Exact procedures
used in establishing
conditions and the
measurement of
results in an
experiment.
Defining the Operation
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007
The Five Steps of the Scientific Method
Developing a
hypothesis
Performing a
controlled test
Independent Variable
The stimuli you are studying
Gathering
objective data
Analyzing the
results
Publishing,
criticizing, and
replicating the
results
A condition that the experimenter
changes independently of all the
other carefully controlled
conditions.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007
Independent Variable v. Dependent Variable
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable
The measured outcome
of a study
The stimuli you are
As in….
studying
The responses made by
the participants in
For example………
experiment.
--In a study of how different dosages ofyour
a drug
are related to
• the severity of the
the severity of symptoms of a disease,
symptoms of the disease is a dependent variable.
--The administration of the drug in specified doses is the
independent variable.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007
The Independent Variable here
is…
The Amount of Light
The Dependent Variable here
is.…
How much the plants
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007
Confounding Variables
• An unwanted variable that can have
unpredictable influence over the results of a
study.
– EX: Seniors are more likely to have tried
drugs than freshman.
• Confounding or extraneous variables
might included socio-economical
differences in the 2 classes, cohort
differences, educational offerings may
differ and influence personal choices,
etc…
Bias in Research
Types of Bias
• Personal Bias
• Expectancy Bias
Method to avoid Bias
• Double-blind studies: Neither the researcher,
nor the subject knows if they are in the control
or the experimental group (used often to test
new meds)
• Identifying confounding/extraneous factors also
help to minimize incorrect research results
Ethics
• American Psychological Association (APA)
– Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of
Conduct
• Institutional Review Board (IRB)
– Reviews all research conducted by an institution,
university, etc
• Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
(IACUC)
– Must approve all animal research
• Uses the ABC’s of animal research as a guideline:
Appropriate, Beneficial, Caring
Ways to Conduct a NonExperimental Study
• Correlational Study
– Occurs ex post facto
– Correlated does NOT mean causal
– +/-correlation coefficients show relationships between 2
variables on a scale of –1.0-+1.0
• Survey
• Naturalistic Observation (Concealed, Open, and NonParticipant)
Long Range Studies
• Longitudinal Study
• Cross-Sectional Study
• Cohort-Sequential Study
Correlation
• A relationship between 2 variables
–+ as one variable increases, the other
increases; OR as one variable
decreases, the other decreases
• The more McD’s you eat, the more
you will weigh
–- as one variable increases, the other
decreases
• The more cigarettes you smoke, the
lower your running endurance
Correlation Coefficient
• A number between –1.0 and +1.0, which
shows the extent of the variables’
relationship
–A score of 0 would indicate NO
relationship
–Whether positive or negative, the closer
to 1, the stronger the relationship
• The more clustered the data points in
a graph, the stronger the relationship
Inferential Statistics
• Used to infer whether or not 2
groups are similar or different
–Hypothesis: Students who listen
to music while studying are more
academically successful. We see
if listening to music correlate to
high achieving and low achieving
groups of students
Sampling
• Random- drawn from a hat
• Representative- Gallup pollsEX: Are you 18-25? Do you
see yourself as a Democrat or
Republican?
Statistical Significance
• We study Psychology in probabilities and likelihoods,
NOT absolutes (it’s a SOFT science)
• We use p<.05 (5%) to determine significant difference
between 2 groups: probability results are due to
chance is less than 5 %
– MEANING: IF we looked at 2 groups from the earlier
hypothesis and find that 92% of high achieving students
listen to music while studying, whereas 12% of low achieving
students listen to music, we can INFER that listening to
music increases achievement.
• If the numbers were 92% listen in both groups, we can
INFER that studying to music will not make a difference in
achievement.
• If we find 92% in the hi ach. Group listen to music, and
the low group just doesn’t study, NO inference can be