Transcript Document

International Partnership for Microbicides
The State of Research and Development of
Microbicides for the Prevention of HIV
Brussels, 7 October 2005
Dr. Zeda Rosenberg
What is a Microbicide?
Substance that can substantially
prevent or reduce transmission of HIV
when applied to the vagina
Could potentially be made in many
forms:
– gel or cream
– sponge
– film
– suppository
– ring or diaphragm
Comprehensive Approaches to HIV/AIDS
Prevention
Prior to
Exposure
Prior
to Exposure
Vaccines
Pre-exposure
prophylaxis
STI treatment
Time of
Exposure
Point
of Transmission
Treatment
and Care
Male and female
condoms
Anti-retroviral
therapies
Anti-retroviral
therapies
(mother-to-child)
Opportunistic
infection
therapies
Behavior change
Microbicides
Basic care
Microbicides offer a woman-initiated method
to reduce HIV transmission
Female Anatomy
Uterus
Sperm
Front
Back
Uterus
Cervix
Bladder
Cervical
epithelium
Pubic bone
Urethra
Cervix
Vagina
Fornix of vagina
Exterior os
Rectum
Vaginal
epithelium
Vagina
Fungi
Candidiasis
Protozoa
Trichomonas
Viruses
HIV
Human papilloma
Cytomegalovirus
Hepatitis
Bacteria
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Chiamydia trachomonas
Treponema pallidum
Haemophilus
Lactobacillus
Lumen
Epithelium
Stroma
Drug Delivery Formulations
Delivery of active
– Cervix/Vagina
- Lumen
- Surface
- Intracellular
Application frequency
– Duration of activity
Cost
Manufacturing ease
Other functions
– Anti-inflammatory
– Anti-STD
– Lubricating
– Spermicidal
Stability
Aesthetics
– Feel, taste, odor
Drug Development Process



Pre-clinical – formulation; in vitro and in
vivo
Safety trials – tens to hundreds of
participants; drug absorption and
distribution in the body; product delivery,
dosage, and duration; tissue coverage and
tolerability; male and female product use
acceptability; male tolerance.
Large-scale efficacy trials – multi-country;
multi-site; thousands of women trial
participants; conclusive effectiveness
testing
IPM Mission
IPM’s mission is to
prevent HIV
transmission by
accelerating the
development and
access of safe and
effective
microbicides for use
by women in
developing
countries.
Need for the IPM




International organization dedicated to
microbicide development
Identify and support promising new MBC
candidates through the development process
Raise sufficient resources to fund rapid
development of MBC candidates for product
licensure
Prepare for availability and adoption of
microbicides in resource-poor areas
Guiding Principles as a PDP


Not business as usual
Reduce time to licensure
 The faster MBC are approved, the faster women will have
access to them
 Rapid development of safe and effective MBC means
more lives saved

Provide resources to MBC developers
 Infrastructure
 Financial




Identify best practices from both public and private
sectors
Collaborate with both public and private sector
partners
Maintain open dialogue with communities
Protect women’s health
Opportunities For Action
Pipeline
IPM Involvement
Primary Supporter
Polymers
Cyanovirin
CCR5 Blockers
TMC 120
Supporting
In Conversation
Polymers
Soluble DC SIGN
CAP
BMS 806
EMPRO Molecules
Merck 167
BMS 806
CCR5 Blockers
Imquest Library
Merck 167
PMPA
UC 781
PMPA
UC 781
Imquest Library
•Other candidates also exist including many proteins with multiple mechanisms of
action, other redundant small molecules including NNRTI’s and NRTIs’
Donors













Canada
Denmark
European Commission
Ireland
Norway
The Netherlands
Sweden
United Kingdom
United States
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
The Rockefeller Foundation
World Bank
UNFPA
International IPM
Collaborators



R&D collaborators include:
 St. George’s Hospital Medical School, UK
 GlaxoSmithKline, UK
 Warner Chilcott, Northern Ireland office
 Queen’s University, Ireland
 Tibotec-Virco, Belgium
 European Microbicide Project
Clinical and Regulatory Affairs collaborators include:
 Medisearch International, Belgium
 University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
 International Antiviral Therapy Evaluation Center, Netherlands
 World Health Organization
 Triclinium, South Africa
 FARMOVS-Parexel, South Africa / Multinational
Access collaborators include:
 Health and Development Africa, South Africa
 JHPIEGO, Zambia
Funding for Microbicides

Funding in 2004 – US
$140 million
Ireland
$3 million
Advocacy
$65 million
Research
Other
European Commission
Netherlands
UK
United States
Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation
NIH – 71%
USAID – 25%
CDC – 4%
$72 million
development
Cost and Financial Gap

In 2004, US$140 million was spent on
microbicide research, development and
advocacy
 $65 million on research + $72 million on
development + $3 million on advocacy

In 2005 and subsequent five years, this
amount must increase to US$280 million
 $130 million on research + $120 million on
development + $20 million on site development
+ $10 million on advocacy
Conclusion
With leadership, sufficient
financial resources, collaborative
efforts and product development
expertise, women in developing
countries should have access to
effective microbicides within the
next 5 to 10 years.
Contact Information

Visit our website at:
www.ipm-microbicides.org

Ms. Tessa Mattholie, European Liaison
Officer
Telephone: +32 (0)2-507-1224
Email: [email protected]