Transcript Slide 1

Microbicides:
Science, research, and
overview of the field
Dr Kamini Walia,
Indian Council of Medical
Research, New Delhi
Bindiya Patel,
Global Campaign for Microbicides
A "microbicide" is any substance that
can substantially reduce
transmission of sexually transmitted
infections (STIs) and HIV when
applied either in the vagina or
rectum.
Why Microbicide?


Many women acquire HIV or STDs from a
steady partner
Consistent condom use difficult to achieve
in the longer term relationships
• Few interventions have achieved consistent
use in more than 30% of couples

Contraceptive aspect of existing
prevention methods is a major barrier to
their use
The search for the ideal
microbicide
•
•
Rationale: Unprotected Sex-reproduction,
coercion, pleasure
Active against a range of sexually
transmitted pathogens
•
Not irritating to mucosal surfaces
•
+/- spermicidal formulations
•
Acceptable (odor, color, taste, lubricity,
portability, “stealth factor”)
Imagine a Full Spectrum of
Interventions
Point of
transmission
Prior to exposure
Treatment
•Rights-focused
behaviour change
•Male and female
condoms and lube
•Anti-retroviral
treatment
•VCT
•PMTCT
•STI screening and
treatment
•Clean injecting
equipment
•Treatment for
opportunistic
infections
•Male circumcision
•PEP
•Preventative
vaccines
•Vaginal and
rectal
microbicides
•PREP
•Cervical barriers
•Basic care/nutrition
•Prevention for
positives
•Education and
behavior change
•Therapeutic
vaccines
Science and Research
Overview
What is the most critical need in
research?
Proof of Concept

There is no definitive data as yet
establishing that any product applied
topically in humans can prevent HIV
infection.
Desirable Properties of an Ideal
Vaginal Microbicide




Retain activity in the presence of semen and over
a broad pH range, ideally for several hours
Products must not disrupt the normal vaginal
flora
Agents and vehicles for delivery must be
compatible for use with condoms and delivery
systems
Ensure adequate distribution and retention in
vagina
1. boosts vagina’s
natural defenses
4. anti-retrovirals
2. surfactants
3. entry inhibitors
Source: Shattock, R.; Moore, J. Inhibiting Sexual Transmission of HIV-1 Infection. Nature Reviews Microbiology. Vol 1, October 2003.
Steps in research










Drug discovery
In vitro testing
Animal model testing (safety)
Formulation
Scale up manufacturing
Phase I early safety
Phase II expanded safety
Phase IIb
Phase III efficacy
Social science research
The Product Pipeline in 2008
3 products
3 products
30+ products
Laboratory
Testing
2-6 Years
4 products
Phase I
(safety)
Phase II
(safety)
Phase III
(efficacy)
1 to 6
Months
Up to 2
Years
2 to 4
Years
25 – 40
people
200-400
people
3,000-10,000
people
Simultaneous studies in some cases:
HIV+, penile & rectal safety
10 or more years
Source: Alliance Pipeline Update, first week of every month - http://www.microbicide.org/publications
Clinical Trial Sites in 2007
EUROPE
- Belgium: Phase I/II
THE AMERICAS:
-United States: Phase I, II, IIB
-Brazil: Phase II
ASIA
-India: Phase II
-Thailand: Phase I
WEST AFRICA:
-Cameroon: Phase I, II
AUSTRALIA
- Phase I
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA:
-Botswana:
-Kenya: planned
-Madagascar: Phase
-Malawi: Phase II, IIB
-Rwanda: Phase I/II
-South Africa: Phase I, IIB, III
-Tanzania: Phase III
-Uganda: Phase III
-Zambia: Phase IIB, III
-Zimbabwe: Phase I, II, IIB
Source: Alliance for Microbicide
Development
Products Furthest Along
Product
Trial sponsor
# women
to be
enrolled
Buffer Gel
HPTN035-NIH
3,100
women
South Africa, Malawi,
Zambia, Zimbabwe
and Philadelphia
April 2009
Carraguard
Population Council
6,202
women
South Africa – 3
locations
Feb 2008
PRO2000 (.5%)
HPTN035-NIH
3,100
women
South Africa, Malawi,
Zambia, Zimbabwe
and Philadelphia
April 2009
PRO2000
(.5 and 2%)
DFID, MRC
9,763
women
South Africa, Uganda,
Zambia, Tanzania
December
2009
1% Tenofovir Gel
CAPRISA
980 women
South Africa
2010
Location
Preliminary
results
expected in
Experience of a
Phase III Participant
Family
Planning
Informed
consent for
screening
Informed
consent
to enroll.
Condoms +
experimental
gel
Condoms +
comparator
gel
Recruitment:
Participant
receives
information
about the trial
in their own
language
Screening Visit 1:
Education about the
trial, HIV and
pregnancy test, STI
tests and treatment,
baseline data
collected
Screening Visit 2:
Results of tests,
counseling,
reinforce education
about trial
Randomization:
Participant
assigned by
chance to a group.
Microbicides which are
antiretrovirals



Have high specificity and potency
Not effective against other STIs
Potential for drug resistance with a
single drug
The case for combination
microbicides
The arguments for using inhibitors in
combination for prevention are as strong as
they are for treatment.
• Increased breadth of coverage against divergent
strains.
• Possible synergy, creating dose-sparing effects.
• Reduced probability of transmitting viruses
resistant to any single inhibitor.
• BUT the approval process not yet clear
When can we expect a
microbicide?


Earliest results from current Phase III
trials in 2008-2009
If shown to be effective, a microbicide
may be available in a few countries via
introductory studies in the next 5 years
• If not, we will have to
wait for results from
second generation
products
Potential Public Health Impact
If a 60% effective product
Offered to 73 lower income countries
Is used by 20% people reached by health care
during 50% of unprotected sex acts
= 2.5 million HIV infections averted
in 3 years including women, men and children
The Actors
in the Microbicides Field
Range of Players




Researchers (lab, trials, social
science)
Trial sponsors
Funders
Advocates
Who is doing Microbicide R&D?




Public–sector entities
Non-profit research entities
Small biopharmaceutical companies
Large pharmaceutical have steered clear…
o
o
o
o
Perceived low profitability
Lack of proof of concept
Few expert in vaginal products
“Developing world” considered to be primary
customers
Who is paying for this work?



Public institutions (86%)
Philanthropic sources (12%)
Commercial sector (2%)
Total of US $222 Million in 2006
http://hivresourcestracking.org
Indian players





ICMR: NARI, Pune, NIRRH, Mumbai
CSIR:CDRI, Lucknow
DRDO:DIPAS, New Delhi
YRG, Chennai
Indian Network of NGOs
Advocacy Aims
• Sufficient resources for the entire field
• R&Ds
• Social science research
• Advocacy
• Community involvement
• Community and political support so that trials can
take place
• Individuals and communities have a voice in the
decisions that affect their lives
• Access to products once they are available
What You Can Do

Get in touch with local advocates

Sign up for newsletters, listservs

Join / endorse groups

Educate yourself and others:
• Presentations
• Events
• Web-links
• Newsletters
• Use our film
• Fact sheets
www.global-campaign.org, www.rectalmicrobicides.org, www.microbicide.org