Regional Assessment, Data Warehousing and Reporting Services

Download Report

Transcript Regional Assessment, Data Warehousing and Reporting Services

TBAISD Regional Assessment, Data
Warehousing and Reporting Services
7/13/10
About TBAISD

24,000 students
 16 LEAs
 4 PSAs
 12 Non-Public


5 counties
Diverse in terms of school size
 TCAPS
@ 10,000
 Crawford @ 50

Most districts lack any curriculum or technology
administration.
Current Reality










PLC want-a-be;
Assessment diverse;
DRIP;
Collecting more than applying;
Fragmented data storage and reporting;
Loss of continuity over time;
Over-dependency on MEAP/MME;
Lack of “regionalized” PD models;
Lack of consistent use of data by service providers;
Frustration
“A lack of clear and comprehensive data
management standards has allowed us to
devolve into a mess of incompatible parallel
systems that gradually lost sync with each
other. As a result, our ability to use data to
make well-informed decisions was severely
compromised." Many if not most districts are
faced with the same challenge. Defining the
standards for information collection and
documentation are critical actions for
districts as they develop their student datacollection systems.
-"The Administrators Guide to Data-Driven
Decision Making," Todd McIntire
Questions

How do we “teach people to use data” if..





we don’t know what data they generate?
what they have is disorganized?
not mapped to a specific purpose?
not common across the region?
Is there a “least common denominator” of assessment
that will enable the construction of REGIONAL:







procedures?
administration?
pricing contracts?
data systems?
PD?
service alignment?
instructional application?
Assessment Committee

Assure that assessment data is used to improve
instruction, curriculum and programming.

Establish a vision for a regional data set that can be
used for individual identification and program evaluation
(supports curriculum alignment, RtI, early literacy,
college readiness, differentiation, teacher evaluation)

Structure support systems aligned to the desired data
set (professional development, group pricing, data
management, consulting services, regional
collaboration).
Assessment Profile
Assessment Profile (cont)
Assessment Profile (cont)
Information Architecture
Data Director (warehouse):
Fully rostered data structure (ISD, district, building, grade, teacher, student, demographics);
Repository of all specified performance data sets (historical, and tied to UIC codes)
Repository of regional assessments and item banks;
Data aggregation across region and across assessments;
Reporting services (republishing/enhancing/streamlining what is available from individual testing services)
Ad-Hoc report generation and data mining
Supports localized online assessment and storage practices;
Kindergarten
Readiness
AIMS Web
(Target K-3)
NWEA
(Target 4-8)
Explore/Plan
(Target 8,9,10)
MEAP/MME/ACT
Regional Common
Assessments
Administered to
incoming students
before enrollment.
Boehm-3
Parent Survey
Early Literacy
Early Numeracy
Oral Reading
Computation
Math
Concepts/App
Progress
Monitoring
Growth tracking
Adaptive
Language Usage
Reading
Comprehension
Math
Science
Performance
against College
Readiness
standards
ACT predictor
State
administered
assessments.
Aligned to
Michigan grade
level and content
area standards.
Test items developed by
area teachers.
Aligned to GLCE/HSCS
Unit based for use as
“test-lets” throughout the
year.
Data reported to teacher
to highlight curricular gaps
in student learning
Data aggregated across
all users for collaborative
use.
How will we gather data?
SIS1
SIS2
LEA2 Explore
LEA1 NWEA
LEA1 PLAN
Non-Public NWEA
ISD AIMS
Non-Public AIMS
LEA2 AIMS
LEA1 AIMS
LEA2 NWEA
LEA3 NWEA
LEA2 PLAN
Non-Public PLAN
Non-Public Explore
Kindergarten Readiness
LEA1 Explore
Direct Entry
Common GLCE Assessments
D
A
T
A
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Data Warehousing/DataDirector:
REGION-WIDE Student Demographic/Roster data
Kindergarten Readiness Data
REGION-WIDE AIMSWeb data
REGION-WIDE NWEA Data
REGION-WIDE GLCE Mastery data
REGION-WIDE Explore Data
REGION-WIDE PLAN Data
REGION-WIDE MEAP/MME/ACT data
D
A
T
A
D
I
R
E
C
O
T
O
R
System Development Plan
(In cooperation with consortium, steered by assessment committee)
Negotiate access to local Student Information Systems (SIS);
 Invent/comply with DD demographic and rostering process;
 Comply with DD import scripts for MEAP/MME;
 Import locally developed common assessments items/tests
into DD;
 Create DD assessment/data entry template for Kindergarten
Round-up;
 Establish data gathering and import scripts for “national”
assessments (AIMSWeb, NWEA, Explore, Plan);
 Centralize purchasing and rostering support for all
assessments;
 Establish “report development” process;
 Establish Data Application PD model
 Launch

Where we stand…




Locally developed common exams
 Items created
 Exams being constructed;
MEAP/MME:
 3 year of historic data loaded using available directives;
K-Readiness:
 assessment structures created;
 data collected;
 ready to upload
AIMS Web:
 all users consolidated under single account umbrella;
 ISD rosters (w/UIC), trains, policies, exports;
 Import directive developed by DD.
 Periodic data loading schedule established.
 Regional pricing established.
Where we stand…

NWEA
 Import directives developed;



Some header repairs pending;
3 years of historic data collected, UIC matched, and uploaded into DD.
 ISD will take-over all future rostering (with UIC)
 Regional pricing established
Explore/Plan
 3 years of past data files purchased from ACT Inc.
 All historic Plan data loaded with available directives
 Historic Explore data load pending directive repairs
 Beginning in 2010
 All districts agree to common test window
 ISD orders for all 8th, 9th,10th
 ISD pays invoice; re-bills LEAs
 ISD pre-identifies answer sheets with UIC
 ISD receives data files from ACT Inc,
 Uploads to DD using import directives
ISD Role in Assessment Management
Account Management

Ordering and Billing;
 Transfer/Merge requests;
 Adding schools;
Continuous Support



Data Integrity police;
Data Team consulting;
Continuous PD coordination;
 Coordinate with ISD service providers;
System Management




Manage permissions of local administrators;
System level settings/configuration;
Data exports/imports into DD;
Report development;
 Rostering and roster maintenance;
 Tracking new features.