Transcript Regional disparities

Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Territorial and urban dimension
1
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Regional disparities
2
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Regional disparities
• regional disparities among regions are significant
– in terms of unemployment rate and economic development dynamics
– significant and increasing regional disparities inside individual regions
– tendencies for creating poles of growth (in economic centres)
• forming of regional centres rather than regional axes
– weak and problem areas emerged – “inner peripheries” (economically
weak areas inside well prospering regions, alongside regional
borders)
– a successful (favorable) regional development of metropolitan areas
can conceal some problems in specific areas at lower level (when
assessing regional level)
• deepening of regional disparities at subregional level
• regions with concentrated state support
– economically weak regions and regions with high unemployment rate
lagging behind regional average (as to economic development)
3
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
GDP per capita
• GDP per capita
in regions (2010)
•
CZ = index 100
4
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
GDP per capita
•
GDP (Municipalities with
extended powers)
•
expert analysis
5
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Index of regional competitiveness
6
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Index of Competitiveness of Municipalities with
extended powers
7
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Migration balance
8
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Unemployment rate – municipalities with
extended powers
9
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Settlement structure
• Classification of
CR municipalities
by size groups
10
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Territorial typology of the Czech Republic
11
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Territorial typology of the Czech Republic
1. Developing areas
– Metropolitan areas (areas with concentration above 300,000
inhabitants)
– Agglomerations – (concentration 100,000 – 300,000)
– Regional centres (incl. surroundings) – 25,000 – 100,000
2. Stabilized areas – not belonging to agglomerations
and regional centres (and their surroundings) and
peripheral areas
3. Peripheral areas – geographically remote areas with
a long-term accumulation of problems (borders areas,
mountain areas, „inner peripheries“ or areas with
specific issues).
12
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Regions with state aid
•
Criteria:
-
GDP
-
unemployment rate
-
indebtedness
-
benefits in material
•
-
needs
migration balance
13
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Social excluded localities – potential of social
exclusion
14
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Territorial dimension objectives
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
to substantially reduce the differences in the socioeconomic level of the Czech regions;
to contribute to the utilization of the Czech regional
potential;
to strengthen local competitiveness of regions, cities and
municipalities;
to support long-term development of labor market;
to improve conditions for sustainable and balanced
development and the quality of life in the CR;
to increase the resource efficiency in achieving ESIF
objectives based on territorial-oriented
actions/interventions;
to effectively promote regional and local development
based on the principles of partnership and multi-level
governance;
to strengthen the urban-rural linkages.
15
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Approaches to TD
• Territorial Dimension setting
• markedly different in individual (Operational)
Programmes
• NUTS II and III level and particularly at lower
administration level
• Common principles:
thematic (sectoral)
territorial
integrated
16
Scheme of Territorial Dimension
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Thematic principle
a) by defining axis, priorities/actions where territorial
principle (based on typology) will be applied (i. e. actions
mainly in selected types of regions)
b) by defining axis, priorities/actions where territorial
principle will partly be applied – percentage ratio for selected
types of regions to all territorial scope
c) by setting contribution to integrated principle – define tools
(instruments) and mechanisms that secure coordination
among ESIF + determine financial allocation of OP/priority
axis… (specific calls for proposal focused on projects within
integrated strategies
d) by defining different types of territory (protected
landscape areas) and modification of evaluative
(assessment) criteria and types of criteria
e) by representation of regional partners within coordination
role, main target groups or beneficiaries
18
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Thematic principle
•
Result from typology of Regional Development Strategy of the CR
2014 – 2020:
Type A: focus on developing potential
1.
Developing areas
–
–
–
2.
3.
Metropolitan areas (areas with concentration above 300,000 inhabitants)
Agglomerations – (concentration 100,000 – 300,000)
Regional centres (incl. surroundings) – 25,000 – 100,000
Stabilized areas – not belonging to agglomerations and regional
centres (and their surroundings) and peripheral areas
Peripheral areas – geographically remote areas with a long-term
accumulation of problems (borders areas, mountain areas, inner
peripheries or areas with specific issues).
plus
Type B : focus on regions supported by state
•
regions supported by the state (regions with economic problem, social
exluded areas)
19
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Integrated principle
• based on relevant instruments
• preliminary proposal:
• ITI – metropolitan areas (fulfilment of 5% of sustainable
urban development requirement)
• ITDP – developing areas, regions supported by the
state --- successor of IUDP
• CLLD – based on the Rural development programme
aimed at peripheral areas priority and selected
stabilized areas, supported also by other thematic OPs
• …
20
Informal Dialogue with the European Commission
March 20, 2013, Prague
Scheme of the integrated instruments
21