Transcript Data Citation Standards and Practices

Data Citation Standards and
Practices
Presentation to BRDI
27 February 2013
Bonnie C. Carroll
Past Co-chair , CODATA/ICSTI TG on Data Citation
Member CODATA Executive Committee
Managing/Supporting
Organizations
• International CODATA Task Group on Data Citation Standards
and Practices
http://www.codata.org/taskgroups/TGdatacitation/index.html
– Approved at CODATA 27th General Assembly in Cape Town, SA 2010
– Renewed at CODATA 28th GA in Taipei, 2012
• Support
– NAS/BRDI US National Committee for CODATA
– Sloan Foundation
– Institute for Museum and Library Services
– Library of Congress
– Microsoft Research staff supports both projects.
CODATA Data Citation Task Group
Co-Chairs:
Jan Brase,(Director, DataCite, and ICSTI representative), Technische Informations Bibliothek (TIB)/German
National Library of Science and Technology, GERMANY
Sarah Callaghan (U.K. CODATA), The NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre, STFC Rutherford Appleton
Laboratory, UNITED KINGDOM
Christine Borgman (US BRDI) UCLA
CODATA Liaison:
Bonnie Carroll (U.S. CODATA and CENDI), President, Information International Associates, USA
Members:
~25 people from 4 continents
Consultants:
Daniel Cohen, Library of Congress ,USA
Franciel Linares, Information International Associates, USA
Yvonne Socha, MLIS candidate, University of Tennessee, USA
Paul F. Uhlir, U.S. National Committee for CODATA and Board on Research Data and Information, National
Academy of Sciences, USA
Data Citation Task Group Objectives
•
•
•
•
Promote scientific data attribution
by promoting practical guidance on
how to publish citable and trackable
data sets.
Investigate and analyze how existing
data repositories cite and provide
attribution to their data sets.
Identify and obtain input from
stakeholders in the library, academic,
publishing and research
communities.
Provide an international forum to
identify and help reconcile the needs
of various stakeholder communities.
•
•
•
Conduct meetings and workshops to
articulate the state of the art and
best practices in this area, and to
identify emerging issues.
Work with the major international,
regional, and national standards
organizations to develop formal data
citation and attribution standards,
guidelines and best practices.
Share information and create greater
awareness of these issues
internationally.
Completed Activities
• Bibliographic inventory and analysis (ongoing).
• Interviews with a sample of 60 identified stakeholders
concerning data citation practices
–
–
–
–
Data Repositories
Publishers
Researchers
Funding Organizations
• Held international workshop on current practices (see below)
• Established a public web presence.
• Sponsored Sessions at CODATA Conference in Taipei,
2012\Active dissemination of first phase results in 2013.
• White Paper on Current Practices in Data. (2013)
BRDI’s Role
• In collaboration with the CODATA-ICSTI TG, held a large
international workshop to define the issue,
– Internationalize it with a broad cross-section of
international groups and stakeholders.
– BRDI staff gets funding for the US and international parts,
and supports both.
– 8/11 in Berkeley, in connection with the annual DataCite
meeting.
– Published the report through the Academy in the fall of
2012– For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and
Citation
Practices and Standards.
– BRDI steering committee chaired by Christine Borgman.
• Supported participation in three face-to-face meetings
For more information on the symposium and workshop see:
http://sites.nationalacademies.org/PGA/brdi/PGA_063656
Second 2-Year Term
• Workshop 2 - focus on moving existing activities and
infrastructure into best practices
–
–
–
–
–
BRDI/US National CODATA contribution
Implementation strategy for uptake
Possible options for standards
Fall, 2013
Maybe in conjunction with ICSTI in Paris
• Identify areas for possible standards in data citation and work
with standards organizations to develop them
• Develop an outreach and implementation strategy for different
stakeholders, including the data centers, universities and
research community, STM publishers, and research funders.
– Papers, articles, presentations
Input from BRDI: How do we best promote development
and use of best practices?
Proposal for a Revised
CODATA Dues Structure
Presentation to BRDI
27 February 2013
Bonnie C. Carroll
Past Co-chair , CODATA/ICSTI TG on Data Citation
Member CODATA Executive Committee
Drivers for Change
• The current arbitrary nature of the dues amounts is difficult to explain.
• The CODATA unit system is no longer equitable because it does not
track changes in nations ability to pay.
• Objectives
–
–
–
–
Maintain or increase current annual budget
Increase CODATA's financial stability and sustainability.
Address the needs of both CODATA and its national members.
Establish a stable, objective and fair dues system based on a countries
ability to pay.
– Transition smoothly from the existing to the new system.
– Correct imbalances in the current dues structure
– Reduce barriers to membership on the part of developing countries
•
"National Dues Committee
•
•
•
•
John Broome (Treasurer and dues report author)
Bonnie Carroll (representative from a "large GDP" member country)
Niv Ahituv (Membership Committee Chair and representative from a "smaller GDP" country)
Kathleen Cass (CODATA Executive Secretary)
CODATA REVISED DUES STRUCTURE
 Modified version of ICSU banded dues model
o Each member country will be placed in one of 10 bands based on
GPD (most recent 3 years from the OECD).
 The dues and the percentage limits of each band designed to
o Restore alignment of dues with countries ability to pay
o Minimize changes to the dues each for each country, and
o Maintain the current annual dues revenue of CODATA.
 The Treasurer will recalculate annual dues every 2 years
 Only members in good standing will be
included in the calculation.
 Dues changes due to band reclassification CODATA Bands Limits and Dues amounts
Band
lower %
upper %
will take place incrementally over 2 years
1
0.00%
0.50%
 The minimum annual dues amount
2
0.50%
1.00%
3
1.00%
2.00%
will be 1000 Euros
4
2.00%
3.00%
 Dues continue to be adjusted for inflation
5
3.00%
4.00%
6
4.00%
5.00%
annually using the OECD inflation index.
7
5.00%
6.00%
8
6.00%
10.00%
 Dues can be paid in Euros or US$.
9
10.00%
20.00%
Euros
1 000 €
2 000 €
4 000 €
6 000 €
7 000 €
10 000 €
15 000 €
20 000 €
30 000 €
10
20.00%
100.00%
50 000 €
Proposed New Dues
GDP
Country
(units)
Full members
Average GDP for paid up
countries for 2013
OECD 2008-10 Avg.
(euros)
2012
2013
Band Model
CODATA 2012 Dues
CODATA 2013 Dues
CODATA Band
Euros
Euros
#
2014
Calculated 2014 "BandModel" Dues
Euros
Change from 2013
Dues
Euros
USA
10,222.1 €
50,893 €
51,404 €
10
50,000 €
-893 €
China (Beijing)
3,707.9 €
11,451 €
11,566 €
9
30,000 €
18,549 €
Japan
3,682.1 €
29,645 €
29,943 €
9
30,000 €
355 €
United Kingdom
1,692.3 €
23,093 €
23,325 €
8
20,000 €
-3,093 €
Canada
1,056.6 €
12,723 €
12,851 €
6
10,000 €
-2,723 €
Russia
1,042.4 €
6,361 €
6,425 €
6
10,000 €
3,639 €
India
985.0 €
7,634 €
7,710 €
5
7,000 €
-634 €
Australia
789.1 €
7,281 €
7,375 €
5
7,000 €
-281 €
Korea
665.5 €
6,361 €
6,425 €
4
6,000 €
-361 €
Indonesia
422.6 €
2,544 €
2,570 €
3
4,000 €
1,456 €
Taipei
289.1 €
6,361 €
6,425 €
3
4,000 €
-2,361 €
Finland
250.7 €
1,000 €
1,000 €
2
2,000 €
1,000 €
South Africa
221.4 €
2,544 €
2,570 €
2
2,000 €
-544 €
Czech Republic
0.0 €
1,020 €
1,000 €
2
2,000 €
n/a
Israel
146.9 €
2,544 €
2,570 €
2
2,000 €
-544 €
Ukraine
103.5 €
1,016 €
1,000 €
1
1,000 €
-16 €
0.0 €
1,000 €
1,000 €
1
1,000 €
n/a
25,277.2 €
173,471 €
175,159 €
Mongolia
188,000 €
13, 549