Transcript 2015 01 27 Annex 2. Changes and challenges to

Changes and challenges to the
European Social Model (ESM)
Grigor Gradev, ETUI
28 January 2015, Tbilisi
What relation to Georgia?
●
The AA and DCFTA agreements – framework for approximation
with EU standards and practices to gradually integrate into the EU
Internal Market.
●
Main areas of change – governance modes and regimes of
operation of economic and social systems, much less in trade per
se.
●
Chapter 14 - Employment, social policy and equal opportunities
○
Article 354: Georgia will carry out approximation of its legislation to the EU
acts and international instruments referred to in Annex XXX to this Agreement
in accordance with the provisions of that Annex.
●
Georgia will introduce key elements of the ESM (about 40 directives)
within 3-4 years.
The EU at a glance – what it is all about? August Landmesser
The EU as a peace project seems completed. Is it irreversible?
J C Juncker (2012):
● The demons have not been laid to rest – they are only sleeping.
Now they are awakenig both West and East. (France – IPSOS poll
2014)
● Europeans are dwarfs. No one can make it in the globalised world
on their own. We all must come together – core, periphery and the
extensions to show to the world something big and important. This
is the EURO.
B. Segol, Genral Secretary ETUC (2014):
● The crisis and EU policy response is undermining the very concept
of Europe. Unless a radical change, “we will have to file for a
divorce”.
The big question: how to get EU and its social model back on
track?
Why ESM ?
● The founding treaties define the EU as:
●
●
●
●
●
a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and
social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the
quality of the environment.
… shall combat social exclusion and discrimination, and shall promote
social justice and protection
… shall promote economic, social and territorial cohesion, and solidarity
among Member States (Art 2, p. 3)
Title IX – Employment
Title X - Social policy – social dialogue on EU level obligatory
The Lisbon Treaty entered THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN
THE EU as integral part of the text.
●
Europe 2020 strategy - for smart, sustainable and inclusive
growth, … to improve the EU's competitiveness while
maintaining its social market economy model …
(COM(2014) 130 final/2)
ESM – what is it?
Also referred to as:
● Social Europe; Social dimension of European integration which makes
the EU project unique in the world.
● EU - ”convergence machine”, at least until the crisis - reversals
● Often compared to the US model for proof but not always correctly.
ESM operates as a kind of political construct based on a loosely defined
normative concept – “a complex of homological structural and functional
similarities” (Aoust, 2002)
In simple words, the necessity for ESM was recognised with the setting up
of the EU Single Market (mid 1980s) to rebalance and stabilise economic
and political governance and avoiding unfair competition through social
dumping.
Work started mid 1980s under famous Jacques Delors EC involving the
social partners (European employer organisations and ETUC) in the
policy process - de facto launching the European Social Dialoogue (Val
Duchesse process)
● The multi-layer Social Dialogue process in the EU – backbone and
motor of the ESM - the fundamental difference with US and all other
models in the world
● In the new European Commission the Euro is in a special new unit:
EURO and Social Dialogue – EC Vice President
ESM – one model or more?
●
On EU level – the EU insttitutional channel:
● The Commission shall have the task of promoting the consultation of
management and labour at Union level and shall take any relevant
measure to facilitate their dialogue by ensuring balanced support for the
parties.
● To this end, before submitting proposals in the social policy field, the
Commission shall consult management and labour on the possible
direction of Union action
● On initiative of the social partners when they make an agreement on a
proposal, the EC can take it to the Council for adoption as EU law
(directives).
●
●
The second channel – autonomous social dialogue
On the same legal basis and pattern operate 42 committees for
sectoral/branch social dialogue in specific economic areas.
7
yourname © etui (year)
titleofthepresentation
On national level – five pillars of labour-inclusive industrial relations
regime (W. Streek; J. Visser)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
strong and publicly guaranteed trade unions;
routine participation in tripartite policy arrangements based on formal rights;
a high floor of universalistically defined and publicly secured social rights;
a degree of solidaristic wage setting based on coordination at the sectoral
level or above;
a reasonably generalized arrangement of information, consultation, and
perhaps codetermination at the firm level based on the rights of workers and
unions to be involved.
Current state of affairs in the conposition of the ESM/social dialogue:
●
Two major types: classical, neo-corporatist / CEE hybrid
●
Four-Five clusters/models: Nordic, Continental, Southern (Mediterranean)
and Anglo-Saxon + CEE hybrid.
●
28 national systems of labour and social policy.
Main dynamic trend: weakening of efficiency of ESM; EU “convergence motor”
shifted to reverse gear by the austerity policy response to the crisis; social
issues – intercepted by populist/extremist forces.
8
yourname © etui (year)
titleofthepresentation
EU at crossroads?
●
●
9
J C Juncker programme speech at election by EP – A New
Start for Europe
The complex set-up:
●
EU competences vs national sovereignty – labour / social
systems still nationally based
●
EU institutional legitimacy vs the “democratic deficit”
●
Governance centralisation vs divergence pressures and
core-periphery disposition (econ governance/semester vs
strengthening social dialogue, ESM). The future EU is in the
Euro area (R. Sikorski) –Greek puzzle
yourname © etui (year)
titleofthepresentation
Some key challenges - policy priority areas
●
●
●
●
●
●
Employment crisis and its effects on poverty, social exclusion,
incentives for better education and work realisation, social protection
systems, etc.
Deteriorating demographics – active ageing?, migration – freedom of
mobility challenge
European level automatic stabilisers – pooling part of unemployment
benefit funds, minimum wage, social floors/ basic income schemes,etc.
Social economy and effective public services
Informalisation of the formal economy
The rising wave of new technologies, the sharing economy – effects on
work, employment and social relations (low interest rates, QE)
Cumulative effect: (multiple) inequalities
The challenges ahead: rising inequalities – Sweden in the
lead
11
yourname © etui (year)
titleofthepresentation
The German Puzzle – wealth distribution (ECB)
P De Grauwe - Per capita wealth in selected European countries
12
yourname © etui (year)
titleofthepresentation
The relationship between income equality and GDP per head, 2010
13
yourname © etui (year)
titleofthepresentation
The new multilateralism - 3 priorities for 21 century: demographics,
inequality, climate change
●
●
●
●
●
It is not surprising that everyone from the Confederation of British Industry to Pope
Francis is speaking out about it — because it can tear the precious fabric that
holds our society together.
Let me be frank: in the past, economists have underestimated the importance of
inequality. They have focused on economic growth, on the size of the pie rather than
its distribution. Today, we are more keenly aware of the damage done by inequality.
Put simply, a severely skewed income distribution harms the pace and
sustainability of growth over the longer term. It leads to an economy of
exclusion, and a wasteland of discarded potential.
It is easy to diagnose the problem, but far more difficult to solve it.
Think about making taxation more progressive, improving access to health and
education, and putting in place effective and targeted social programs. Yet these
policies are hard to design and—because they create winners and losers—they create
resistance and require courage.
Nevertheless, we need to get to grips with it, and make sure that “inclusion” is given as
much weight as “growth” in the design of policies. Yes, we need inclusive
growth.
●
More inclusion and opportunity in the economic life also means less cronyism and
corruption. This must also rise to the top of the policy agenda.
(Ch. Lagarde, Managing Director IMF, 2014)
Perspectives from the EC and European trade unions
●
Juncker’’s programic speech and the new workplan of the EC.
● Growth and jobs, youth employment a special focus.
● Energy Union
● Digital Economy
● Fairer market and taxation systems
European trade unions welcome the shift in orientation but underline that a
radical change in policy is ther only option.
Optimistic about the new Commission but not uncritical and boundless.
●
Juncker’s Investment plan – financial magic? The relevant Commissioner
did not really answer questions in Parliament. Is it too little too late?
ETUC proposal of 2% of EU GDP invested over 10 years can make a
difference.
● REFIT – how transparent and reasonable the process will be to strengthen
and not further undermine ESM.
What policy EU needs most at the crossroads?
Europe will not be made all at once, or according
to a single plan. It will be build through concrete
achievements which first will create a de facto
solidarity.
Robert Schuman Declaration ( 9 May 1950)
Thank you for the attention