Transcript 2.2 Specific Objectives (Part D, Firms)

Fraunhofer Center for Central and Eastern Europe MOEZ
Mathias Rauch, Deputy Director
Member of the UNECE Team of Specialists on Innovation and Competitiveness Policies
Innovation Strategy of the Republic of
Moldova – First Observations and
Comments on Objectives (Part D, Firms)
and Potential Ways of Implementation
October 27, 2011, ASM, Chisinau
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
Structure of Presentation
3
1
Approaching the strategy:
key questions and sequential
breakdown
Conclusion and key messages
2
Strategy objectives (Part D, Firms):
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
General objectives
Specific objectives
Necessary measures for achieving the objectives
Next Steps: Development of Programs
Key Messages
1. BE AMBITIOUS, BUT REALISTIC!
2. Complicate your economy! (Modernization, Diversification,
Value added, Complexity)
3. KEEP IT SIMPLE! Importance of transparency and simplicity of
implementation and administration of the Strategy and
subsequent programs cannot be overestimated.
4. Activities (Programs) of the Strategy need further elaboration
5. Monitoring and evaluation are key to success! Constant
improvements possible, i.e. in terms of output, outcomes and
impact of the Strategy and subsequent programs
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
Selecting Appropriate Tools and Mechanisms for the
Innovation Strategy
 Key questions:
 Which tools and mechanisms are appropriate for finalization,
implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the strategy?
 What can be learned from similar cases elsewhere?
 Approach: Complex structure and functioning mechanisms of
the strategy can be made more transparent ( logic chart)
 To fully comprehend the strategies’ internal logic a sequential
breakdown is helpful:
Mission
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
Targets
Activities
Output
Outcome
Impact
Logic Chart of the Innovation Strategy (Part D, Firms)
Mission
Targets
(Objectives)
Activities
(Measures,
Programs,
Instruments)
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
Innovation and entrepreneurship based
development, competitive economy
Text on general objectives, 12 specific objectives
named, indicators defined
(1) Should be well designed to specifically serve the
(one respective!) objective
(2) Should concentrate on framework conditions,
investments into infrastructure, no sector focus
(3) Business support services (coaching, finance, …)
(4) Education and training for entrepreneurs and
work force
Logic Chart of the Innovation Strategy (Part D, Firms)
Output
(1) …
(2) …
(3) …
Outcome
Impact
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
(1) …
(2) …
(3) …
(1) Modernization, diversification of the economy
(2) Enhanced competitiveness
(3) Additional employment and tax revenues
Structure of Presentation
3
1
Approaching the strategy:
key questions and sequential
breakdown
Conclusion and key messages
2
Strategy objectives (Part D, Firms):
2.1 General objectives
2.2 Specific objectives
2.3 Necessary measures for achieving the objectives
2.4 Next Steps: Development of Programs
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
2.1 General Objectives (Part D, Firms)
Good starting point, already taking into account:
 General objective aims to foster the development of innovative
companies, with high flexibility and technological excellence;
 Absorb already tested technologies, prepare specialists in established
areas, and continue technology and product development;
 Non-technological and organizational innovation, innovation culture and
absorptive capacity;
 Facilitate companies’ access to public research infrastructure and stimulate
science-industry partnerships;
 Support and stimulate cooperation between R&D institutions and
companies, with positive impact on company development and
implementation of R&D results;
 Companies with high technological capacity must be supported at all
stages of development of innovative technologies;
 Business internationalization and export orientation as key growth
options, while also focusing on local opportunities in the Republic of
Moldova.
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
2.2 Specific Objectives (Part D, Firms) (1)
 D1. Increasing business expenditure on R&D and innovation (BERD) to the
level of EU27 average (year 2009: 1.25%) by 2020;
 That means from zero to hero! None of the EU-10 countries reaches that
level!
 D2. Increasing the share of SMEs developing in-house innovation activities
to at least 40%;
 D3. Increasing the share of SMEs implementing innovative products or
processes to at least 35%;
 D4. Increasing the share of SMEs developing joint innovative activities
with other firms to at least 10% which will ensure the emergence of
important network synergies in the national R&D and innovation systems;
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
2.2 Specific Objectives (Part D, Firms) (2)
 D5. Increasing the number of public-private publications to achieve at
least 40 per 1 million population, in correlation with the increasing cofinancing of R&D by the public and private sector;
 Very ambitious! Average EU-15 (year 2008) is 43.4! Who is going to be the
private business counterpart? (See also comment on BERD)
 D6. Increasing the number of patent applications to at least 5 patents per
EUR 1 billion GDP;
 A patent has no per se value. Cost-benefit analysis, mechanisms for
exploitation of IPR and commercialization necessary
 D7. Increasing the number of applications for trade mark registration to
at least 10 applications per EUR1 billion GDP;  See comment above
 D8. Increasing the number of requests for community designs to at least
the double of the current level;  See comment above
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
2.2 Specific Objectives (Part D, Firms) (3)
 D9. Increasing the involvement in knowledge-intensive activities of at
least 15% of employees in real economy.
 D10. Increasing the share of medium and high technology production
exports to 35 % of total exports;
 D11. Increasing the share of knowledge-intensive services to at least 50%
of exports;
 D12. Increasing the share of foreign sales of patents and licenses to at
least at least 0.5% of GDP.
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
2.3 Measures (Part D, Firms) (1)
Necessary measures to be undertaken to achieve specific objectives are:
 Encouraging young people to open firms, improving of the business
people’s image, implementation of motivating programs, and support for
the opening of new businesses.
 Points to incentive schemes and favorable framework conditions, detailed
policy programs needed
 Measurement and stimulating the achievement of productivity level of
the workforce to the average European level.
 Creation of support mechanisms and stimulating Moldovan companies to
import advanced high tech of production
 Creating advisory infrastructure of the firms on various aspects of
innovation;
 Improving business management capabilities by supporting
implementation of new forms of management and non-technology
innovations.
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
2.3 Measures (Part D, Firms) (2)
Necessary measures to be undertaken to achieve specific objectives are:
 Facilitating the access to finance;
 Implementation of access instruments to researching infrastructure.
 Stimulating the development of research within the companies, especially
in big ones;
 Stimulating the implementation of non-technological innovations;
 Developing mechanisms to promote: innovational marketing,
internationalization, innovation brokerage;
 The introduction of innovation as a priority within the national programs
of entrepreneurship support.
How shall these measures be substantiated and
implemented?  Detailed Policy Programs Needed!
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
2.4 Next Steps: Development of Programs

Implementation and administration procedures of the subsequent
programs should be as less complex and time-consuming as possible

Selection criteria/process should be transparent and comprehensible for
applicants, many procedures can be based on competition

Data collection and indicator system for assessing the outcomes of the
programs can be enhanced (e.g. further indicators, including control
groups); also consider measuring outputs and impacts

High quality evaluation at low cost is based on integration of evaluation
in the design of the program
Monitoring and evaluation are viewed as necessary to
continuously revise and improve the Innovation Strategy and
its implementation
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
Structure of Presentation
3
1
Approaching the strategy:
key questions and sequential
breakdown
Conclusion and key
messages
2
Strategy objectives (Part D, Firms):
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
General objectives
Specific objectives
Necessary measures for achieving the objectives
Next Steps: Development of Programs
Key Messages
1. BE AMBITIOUS, BUT REALISTIC!
2. Complicate your economy! (Modernization, Diversification,
Value added, Complexity)
3. KEEP IT SIMPLE! Transparency and simplicity of
implementation and administration of the Strategy and
subsequent programs can be improved
4. Activities (Programs) of the Strategy need further elaboration
5. Monitoring and evaluation are key to success! Constant
improvements possible, i.e. in terms of output, outcomes and
impact of the Strategy and subsequent programs
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
Monitoring and Evaluation System – A Potential Baseline
Continuous
evaluation/monitoring
Continuous data collection
and analysis allows for
flexible reactions
Evaluation of particular
priority axes
Aims at assessing the direct
impacts of particular priority
axes within the support
programs
Strategic evaluation
Puts the program impacts in
relation to other national/
regional policy targets
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
Integrated
approach for
systematic
monitoring
and evaluation
allows for
better steering
and planning
Thank you for your attention.
Contact: [email protected]
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
EU-10 at a Glance: Economy and Human Capital
Competitiveness and Knowledge Intensity of Economy
Latest Data
EU10
EU15
EU10
Gross Domestic Investment Quota
EU15
EU10
Degree of Openness: ½ *(Exports + Imports) in % of GDP
EU15
EU10
Salary per employee, in €
EU15
EU10
Foreign Trade Saldo in % of GDP
EU15
EU10
Average FDI Inflows between 2004 and 2009 in % of GDP
EU15
EU10
High- and Medium-High-Tech-Exports in % of all Exports
EU15
EU10
Patents and Licencing Revenue from abroad in % of GDP
EU15
EU10
Gross Value Added in Knowledge Intensive Services in % of
overall Gross Value Added
EU15
Gross Value Added of High- and Medium-High-Tech-Industries EU10
in % of overall Gross Value Added
EU15
GDP per Employed Person, in €
Researchers in Private Business Sector in % of all Employed
Persons
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
EU10
EU15
 Annual growth rate
, in %
7,9 (2004-10)
21.060 (2010)
63.509 (2010)
1,6 (2004-10)
20,5 (2010)
-1,0 (2004-10)
18,3 (2010)
-1,0 (2004-10)
57,3 (2010)
1,3 (2004-10)
38,7 (2010)
2,1 (2004-10)
10.783 (2010)
7,5 (2004-10)
36.979 (2010)
1,7 (2004-10)
0,5 (2010)
—
0,9 (2010)
—
7,1 (2004-09)
4,0 (2004-09)
54,7 (2010)
1,7 (2004-10)
56,0 (2010)
-1,1 (2004-10)
0,21 (2010)
7,5 (2004-10)
0,56 (2010)
6,6 (2004-10)
31,9 (2008)
0,5 (2004-08)
46,1 (2008)
0,6 (2004-08)
7,2 (2009)
-0,4 (2004-09)
6,5 (2009)
-3,3 (2004-09)
0,11 (2009)
0,37 (2009)
5,5 (2004-09)
2,3 (2004-09)
EU-10 at a Glance: Research and Innovation
R&D (1)
Gross Expenditure on R%D in % of GDP (GERD)
R&D Expenditure Government in % of GDP (GOVERD)
R&D Expenditure in Unternehmen in % of GDP (BERD)
R&D Expenditure in Higher Education Sector in % of GDP
(HERD)
R&D Expenditure by State in % of GERD
R&D-Finanzierung durch Unternehmen in % of GERD
R&D-Finanzierung durch das Ausland in % of GERD
R&D Personel in % of Employed
Researchers in % of R&D-Personel
Patentanträge (EPO) per Mio. Einwohner
Patenterteilungen (EPO) per Mio. Einwohner
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
Latest Data
Average Annual Growth
Rate in %
0,9 (2009)
2,1 (2009)
0,24 (2009)
0,27 (2009)
0,41 (2009)
1,31 (2009)
0,23 (2009)
0,50 (2009)
50,5 (2008)
33,3 (2008)
40,4 (2008)
55,2 (2008)
6,6 (2008)
9,0 (2008)
0,58 (2009)
1,32 (2009)
73,1 (2009)
61,1 (2009)
7,0 (2010)
165,1 (2010)
0,4 (2010)
69,5 (2010)
3,5 (2004-09)
2,1 (2004-09)
1,2 (2004-09)
2,4 (2004-09)
3,8 (2004-09)
1,6 (2004-09)
6,2 (2004-09)
3,6 (2004-09)
0,3 (2004-08)
-1,2 (2004-08)
0,4 (2004-08)
0,3 (2004-08)
-1,3 (2004-08)
1,4 (2004-08)
1,4 (2004-09)
2,8 (2004-09)
1,5 (2004-09)
0,5 (2004-09)
11,8 (2004-10)
2,2 (2004-10)
7,5 (2004-10)
-1,4 (2004-10)
EU-10 at a Glance: Research and Innovation
R&D (2)
Markeneintragungen (WIPO) per Mio. Einwohner
Industrielle Geschmacksmuster (WIPO) per Mio. Einwohner
Wissenschaftliche Publikationen per Mio. Einwohner
Patentanträge (EPO) per Mio. € R&D-Expenditures
Patentanträge per 1000 Forscher
Publikationen per Forscher
Industrielle Geschmacksmuster per R&D-Expenditures in
Unternehmen (BERD)
Aktueller Stand
 Jahreswachstumsrate,
in %
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
715,6 (2009)
1354,8 (2009)
65,6 (2009)
259,4 (2009)
592,6 (2010)
1501,8 (2010)
0,09 (2009)
0,27 (2009)
3,9 (2009)
43,4 (2009)
0,33 (2009)
0,42 (2009)
-1,8 (2004-09)
-1,7 (2004-09)
6,3 (2004-09)
4,3 (2004-09)
7,8 (2005-10)
3,9 (2005-10)
0,6 (2004-09)
-2,0 (2004-09)
9,8 (2004-09)
-2,3 (2004-09)
7,4 (2005-09)
1,0 (2005-09)
EU10
1,93 (2009)
-6,0 (2004-09)
EU15
0,72 (2009)
1,4 (2004-09)
EU10
2,1 (2008)
-6,5 (2004-08)
EU15
2,2 (2008)
-6,8 (2004-08)
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
13,3 (2008)
13,0 (2008)
34,8 (2008)
54,9 (2008)
1,5 (2004-08)
-1,7 (2004-08)
—
—
EU10
24,0 (2008)
-0,7 (2004-08)
EU15
43,5 (2008)
0,2 (2004-08)
Innovation
Innovation Expenditures of innovative companies in % of
turnover
Turnover share of new-to-market/new-to-firm Innovations in %
Innovative companies in % of all companies
Companies with technological innovations in % of all
companies
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
EU-10 at a Glance: Two Spotlights
International Networks and Mobility
Internationale wissenschaftliche Ko-Publikationen per Mio.
Einwohner
Aktueller Stand
 Jahreswachstumsrate,
in %
EU10
232,5 (2008)
6,5 (2004-08)
EU15
651,7 (2008)
7,3 (2004-08)
2,1 (2008)
—
4,3 (2008)
2,1 (2009)
11,8 (2009)
44,1* (2009)
—
Expenditures on transnational koord. Research projects in % of EU10
public R&D expenditures
EU15
EU10
Im Ausland geborene HRST in % aller HRST
EU15
EU10
Anteil of Hochschulforscher mit internationaler
Mobilitätserfahrung in %
EU15
Im europäischen Ausland Studierende in % aller Studenten
Bevölkerungsanteil mit Englisch-Sprachfertigkeiten in %
-2,0 (2004-09)
6,8 (2005-09)
—
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
55,9* (2009)
3,1 (2009)
2,5 (2009)
25,3 (2007)
58,1 (2007)
—
6,2 (2004-09)
5,1 (2004-09)
—
—
EU10
EU15
EU10
EU15
EU10
8,8 (2008)
43,4 (2008)
4,9 (2009)
6,6* (2009)
4,0 (2008)
12,0 (2004-08)
1,6 (2004-08)
-1,0 (2004-09)
4,5* (2004-09)
-4,6 (2004-08)
EU15
2,5 (2008)
4,7 (2004-08)
Knowledge Transfer
Öffentlich-Private Ko-Publikationen per Mio. Einwohner
Arbeitsplatzmobilität of HRST
Unternehmensfinanzierte Forschung bei Staat und
Hochschulen in % of GERD
© Fraunhofer MOEZ
EU-10 at a Glance: Two Determinants
Societal Acceptance of Science and Technology (S&T)
Trust in S&T, Share of high trust in %
Interest in S&T, Share of high interest in %
Aktueller Stand
 Jahreswachstumsrate,
in %
EU10
66 (2010)
-3,3 (2005-10)
EU15
65 (2010)
-3,3 (2005-10)
EU10
20 (2010)
-0,2 (2005-10)
EU15
33 (2010)
0,4 (2005-10)
EU10
—
—
EU15
0,017 (2009)
-5,3 (2004-09)
EU10
—
—
EU15
0,075 (2009)
-2,2 (2004-09)
EU10
—
—
EU15
0,103 (2009)
-16,6 (2004-09)
Venture Capital (VC)
VC for early starting phase in % of GDP
VC for company growth investments in % of GDP
VC for Mergers and Akquisitions in % of GDP
© Fraunhofer MOEZ