Transcript Discussion on the CIP_12 Feb_2015_by_Adriano

Discussion on
The Bangladesh Country Investment Plan:
A Roadmap toward investment in
Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition
(2010-2015)
by
The Food Policy Monitoring Unit Team
Table of Content
0. CIP and FPMU role
1. Institutional capacity and give motivation to officers in
partners ministries
2. Progress, issues, bottleneck, and successful strategies
3. Capacity development within financing, human resources,
knowledge, processes needed to deliver the discussed
products and services
4. Methodology of setting investment portfolio framework
5. CIP related products and services
0.
The Bangladesh Country Investment Plan:
A Roadmap toward investment in
Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition
(2010-2015)
The role of FPMU
CIP
Aligned with policy/institutional framework, CIP is a strategic and
coherent set of 12 priority investment programs to improve food
security and nutrition in an integrated way, through a participatory
consultation process
Objectives:
• Plan and invest resources in a coordinated way
• Increase convergence of GoB and DPs funding
• Mobilize additional resources from GoB and DPs
• Monitor and evaluate investment, prioritization and financing gap
CIP
CIP Evolution of Budget
2.8
2011
5.1
4.5
3.7
CIP
2012
6.2
2013
3.6
7.9
2014
-
2.0
4.0
4.1
6.0
8.0
USD Billion
10.0
12.0
Financed part
14.0
Financial Gap
Institutional setting for monitoring CIP - FPMU role
Food Planning
Monitoring
Committee
(FPMC)
Provides
support to
FPMC, NC,
FPWG & TTs
F
P
M
U
Carry out the
monitoring
process
National
Committee
(NC)
Food Policy
Working Group
(FPWG)
Thematic Teams
(TTs, 4)
Provides strategic
orientation on food
security;
establishes high
level commitment
to inter-sectoral
collaboration
among 8 Ministries
Ensures high level
guidance & links with
the Cabinet level,
FPMC, including
representatives from
Civil Society & DPs
Coordinates the
monitoring process
through the TTs,
involving all relevant
GoB Agencies
1.
• What type of Institutional capacity needed to
develop and implement a CIP?
• FS-CIP team’s Lessons learnt on how to motivate
staff and other ministries/agencies (e.g. TT
members) to actively engage them in the CIP
preparation/ implementation/ monitoring
practices?
Institutional capacity to develop/implement CIP
 Capacity strengthening to formulate food policies
• GoB Implementation/coordination monitoring
functions
• GoB Design, management and operation of CIP
• Civil society contribution to the CIP development
 Data management
 Integrate the work on CIP and its outputs in the
business-as-usual tasks
FPMU lessons learnt in motivating TT members
to actively engage them in CIP
STRENGHTS
• Professional linkages within TT
members developed
• TT mechanism already tested and
functioning
• Actively contribution of GoB partners in
organizing the‘Food Security
Investment Forum’and in preparing
technical papers on six thematic areas
OPPORTUNITIES
• Improved linkages with TT members
• Established TT mechanism improved
ownership by TT members
• Involvement of key TT members to
broaden participation among others
WEAKNESSES
• Initial TT’s capacity to collect data
lower than expected
• Alignment with GoB data availability
• Changes in non-FPMU TT members
• TT members often time constrained
THREATS
• Newly non-FPMU TT members not
fully briefed on Monitoring Reports
2.
Capacities in terms of financing, human resources,
knowledge, processes, etc. needed to deliver the
above products and services
Results based framework
Theory
Practice
Log-frame
PLANNING
MONITORING
Objective
Purpose
Result
Activity
CIP
Goal
Outcome
Output
Input
Monitoring…
Activities (e.g. Projects) to reach Results (e.g.
Output) for a certain Purpose (e.g. Outcome) &
contribute to an overall Objective (e.g. Goal)
CIP Financial Data: Process Update
Compile and
merge with
previous data
Data
Data
collection
Format
collection
Collection
Primary
Database
Processing
Validation,
Logical
checking
Final
validation
with ADP
book
Output
tables
CIP
Database
Analysis
Some key words:
Budget, financed budget, financing gap, delivery rate,
cumulative delivery, ADP vs non-ADP projects, DP vs. GoB
financial reporting, etc.
Result Indicators: Goal(s) – Structure
Table 2: NFP goals & SFYP
indicators food security
(MR 2014)
Undernourishment
(3-year average)
Underweight
(0 to 59 months)
Stunting
(0 to 59 months)
2007/08
PoA
baseline
2009/10
Target
CIP/SFYP 2011/12 2012/13
2013
baseline
NFP & CIP Goal
Target
2015
Source
15.4%
15.5%
15.7%
(R)
16.3%
na
17%
(MDG -1)
FAO SOFI
41.0%
BDHS
na
36.4%
BDHS
35.1%
UESD
na
33%
(MDG -1)
BDHS & UESD
43.2%
BDHS
na
41.3%
BDHS
38.7%
UESD
na
38%
BDHS & UESD
Sixth Five Year Plan
Agri GDP growth rate
(constant prices)
GoB spending on social
protection (% of GDP)
Poverty headcount index
(CBN upper poverty line)
Change in Rice wages
(3y moving average)
What…
3.00%
5.22%
2.99%
2.17%
4.4%
4.3%
na
2.42%
2.40%
2.23%
2.18%
3.0%
40.1%
(2005)
31.5%
(2010)
na
na
na
29%
(MDG-1)
-8.11%
5.71%
4.27%
5.84%
5.07%
≥ real GDP
/cap growth
+ 0.5
Where…
BBS Yearbook
of Agri Stat
Finance
Division, MoF
BBS, HIES
Report
BBS Statistical
Yearbook
(wages) &
DAM (prices)
from…
3.
Problems, issues and bottlenecks encountered in the
CIP process and successful strategies utilised
Problems, issues and bottlenecks encountered in the
CIP process and successful strategies utilised
STRENGHTS
• Consultation process involving 13
ministries, academia, farmers’
organizations, NGOs and DPs
• Regular inter-ministerial consultations
improved ownership and responsibility
• Consolidated previous experience and
know-how
OPPORTUNITIES
WEAKNESSES
• Time constrained to work on CIP and
CIP related products/activities
• Staff rotation and selection
• Taking responsibility/risks
• Involvement of Private sector/civil
society
THREATS
• Involvement of other GoB partners
• Staff rotations
create an institutional memory
• Sustainability issues
• Involvement ‘champions’ to broaden
participation among others
• Potential for scope economies between
CIP related activities and business as
4.
Methodology of setting investment portfolio
framework
Methodology of setting investment portfolio
framework
Inter-Ministerial and Multi-sectoral Coordination
Mechanism
6 background papers prepared for the CIP
Within the 3 NFP objectives, 12 Investment programs
derived from the 26 area of action in NFP PoA, by
aggregating and prioritizing those requiring
investment
High level Bangladesh Investment Forum organized
to present the draft CIP
CIP 2010
Methodology of setting investment portfolio
framework

•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•
CIP guiding principles
CIP as a living document (GoB)
Enhanced partnership (private sector/NGOs)
Scaling up nutrition and access (GoB/DPs)
Institutional and technical Innovation in
implementing the CIP (Private sector/NGOs/DPs)
Policy Issues (IFPRI)
Access to and tenure of Water Resources
Lack of access to credit and other financial resources
Integrating private sector involvement
Key Broad programmatic issues
Stable good quality of agricultural inputs
Farmers’ organizations
Water resource management and irrigation
Nutrition
Extension services
Revision of CIP
through a
participatory
consultation
process:
3 outcomes
REVISED
CIP 2011
5.
What are the products and services (e.g.,
preparation of main CIP document, monitoring
reports, data sharing agreements with other
agencies, coordination services, etc.) that
MoEf/SEFOCS needs to consider
CIP related products and services
CIP (2011-15)
CIP background papers
Monitoring Reports (2010, 2012, 2013, 2014,
2015 –ongoing)
Roadmap for producing the MR (2013, 2014,
2015)
CIP financial database (access)
Data sharing with other initiatives, e.g. SUN,
to provide nutrition specific/sensitive financial
data
THANK YOU !