Chapter 8 - Regional Economic Development
Download
Report
Transcript Chapter 8 - Regional Economic Development
Regional Economic Integration
Regional Economic Integration
Levels
of economic integration among nations
Economic and political arguments for/against
History/scope, scope and future prospects for:
–
–
–
–
EU
NAFTA
MERCOSUR, and
APEC
Implications
for business
Regional Economic Integration
Agreements among
geographically proximate
countries to reduce/remove
tariff and non-tariff barriers to free flow of:
– Goods
– Services
– Factors of production
Levels of Economic Integration
Free Trade Area (FTA):
– removes tariffs among members
– members retain own trade policies toward others
Customs Union (CU): FTA+
– common trade policy toward others
Common Market (CM): CU+
– eliminates intra-market factor of production movements
Economic Union (EU): CM+
– full integration of member economies (common policy)
Political Union: EU+
– political and economic integration
Reasons for Regional Integration
Economic
enhancement of the member states
– Free trade
– Fee FDI
Political
Reasons
– Linkages of economies create interdependencies that
reduce the potential for violent conflict
– Grouping gives countries more political clout world-wide
Impediments
– Painful adjustments in certain segments of economy
– Threat to national sovereignty
European Union
25 member countries; 450mm people; GDP >
US
1951 6 members of coal and steel community
– France, Germany (W.), Italy, Belgium,
Netherlands, Luxembourg
1957 Treaty of Rome: European Community
–
–
–
–
Common market
Elimination of internal trade barriers
Common external tariff
Free movement of factors of production
1973 1st enlargement: Britain, Ireland,
Denmark
European Union
1981 2nd enlargement: Greece
1983 3rd enlargement: Portugal, Spain
1992 single European act
Remove all frontier controls
Principle of mutual recognition to product standards
Open public procurement to non-national suppliers
Lift barriers of competition to banks and insurance
Remove restrictions on foreign exchange transactions
Abolish restriction on cabotage (trucking)
1994 Maastricht treaty: European Union
1996 4th enlargement: Austria, Finland, Sweden
2003 5th enlargement: Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic,
Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Slovenia, Cyprus, Malta,
Slovakia
The Euro (€)
Maastricht treaty:
–
–
–
–
€
European common currency adopted 1/1/99
Common foreign and defense policy
Common citizenship
EU parliament with “teeth”
now used by 12 countries (since 1/1/02)
– Sweden, Denmark, Britain opted out
– 10 new countries have to qualify
Benefits of the Euro (€)
Lower transaction costs for individuals /
business
Prices comparable across the continent;
increased competition
Rationalization of production across Europe to
reduce cost
Pan-European capital market
Increase range of investment options available
to both individuals and institutions
Costs of the Euro (€)
ECB
has monetary policy control not nations
Sets interest rates, monetary policy (Frankfurt, Ger.)
Is independent; instructs national central banks
EU
is not an optimal currency area
Few similarities in structure of economic activity
(e.g., Finland vs Portugal)
Interest rates too high in depressed regions or too low
for economically booming regions
May need fiscal transfers from prosperous to
depressed regions
Economic
and political issues may conflict
Early Experience of the Euro (€)
Volatile trading history
– 1999 -- €1 = US$1.17
– 10/2000 -- €1 = US$0.83
– 10/2004 -- €1 = US$1.24
EU enlargement will complicate Euro adoption;
new members with weaker economies
Major members ignoring monetary union rules to
retain control over their fiscal and monetary
policies
Enlargement of the EU
More
member disparity, more difficult
governance
Norway opted out of the EU (1994)
Membership applications pending: Turkey,
Bulgaria, Rumania, Croatia
– Turkish application controversial (economic
development, religion, labor movement problems)
Other non-European
countries will seek
membership
US and Asian countries fear that EU will
become protectionist (“fortress Europe”)
The Americas
North American
Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA): USA, Mexico, Canada
The Andean Pact: Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador,
Colombia, Peru
MERCOSUR (FTA): Brazil, Argentina,
Paraguay, Uruguay
Central American Free Trade Agreement
(CAFTA): Costa Rica, Dominican Republic,
El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras,
Nicaragua
The Americas
Elsewhere
Association of
Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEAN)
– Brunei, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia,
Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore,
Thailand, Vietnam
Asia
Pacific Economic Cooperation
– USA, Japan, China + 15 Pacific nations
NAFTA
USA,
Canada, Mexico (FTA-1988)
– USA-Canada is world’s largest trading
relationship
– USA is Mexico’s largest trading partner
– Mexico, USA’s third largest trading partner
Trade
opening process through tariff
elimination
NAFTA - Key provisions
General (effective 1/1/94)
– Tariffs of all sectors reduced by 99% over 10 yrs
– FDI unrestricted (x-oil and railways in Mexico,
Culture in Canada, airlines-communications US)
– No free movement of labor (x-white collar
easement)
– Protection of intellectual property rights
– Cross-border flow of services unrestricted
– Application of environmental standards
– Two commissions have the right to impose
penalties on issues of health/safety, child labor,
minimum wages
Implications for Business
Opportunities
– Less protectionism; higher economic growth
– Lower cost of doing business (fewer borders)
Threats
– Cultural differences persist
– Increased price competition within blocks
– Across-trading-block rivalry can increase
barriers
– Improvement of competitiveness of many
local firm within the blocks