The European Union

Download Report

Transcript The European Union

The European Union
Economics & Policies
Regional and Social Policy
European Regional Policy

1996 GDP per capita
– 10 richest regions 3.1 times the higher then the
bottom 10
– This is twice the level found in the US

1997 Unemployment
– 10 best regions: on average 3.6%
– 10 worst performing regions: 28,1%
Tom Verbeke
2
Tom Verbeke
3
Tom Verbeke
4
European Regional Policy

The regional problems are extremely divers
– 1994-9: 4 main types of problems
 Lagging regions
– GDP < 75% of EU Average
– Objective 1



Declining industrial areas: objective 2
Certain rural areas: objective 5b
Sub-artic regions (objective 6)
Tom Verbeke
5
European Regional Policy
– Core-pheriphery pattern
 A high percentage of more prosperous regions lie at
the geographical center
 The golden triangle

The centralizing is probably the outcome of
two sets of countervailing forces:
– One set tends to cause convergence
– The other divergence
Tom Verbeke
6
European Regional Policy

Convergence: a series of automatic
equilibrating processes which occur in a
freely functioning market
– Free trade in goods and services will lead to
regions specialising in the production and the
export of goods and services in which they
have a comparative advantage
– These effects are reinforced by the free
movement of factors of production
Tom Verbeke
7
European Regional Policy
– Divergence forces


Economies of scale: conentration of production at larger plants
can lead to great efficiency gains
Localization and agglomeration economies
– Localization economies: firms in the same industry locate close
to one another
– Agglomeration economies: firms from different industries locate
close to one another (transport or financial facilities)

Intra-industry trade and dominant market positions: modern
trade theory questions the ability of regions to share equally in
the growth associated with freer trade. Intra-industry trade has
shown the most rapid growth among more prosperous regions.
Tom Verbeke
8
European Regional Policy


Lack of competitiveness in peripherical regions due
to poor location, weak infrastructure, low-skill
labour forces, local tax, ...
Selective labour migration:
– the freeing of labour mobility stimulates migration from
peripherical regions towards the core
– Migration is selective: the yound and skilled

Currency: nations with peripherical regions could
realign exchange rates but as those realignments
became less frequent, peripherical regions were
especially hurt
Tom Verbeke
9
European Regional Policy

Evidence from the US:
– Long term integration is associated with
convergence of regional disparities rather than
divergence
– Convergence forces eventually come to
predominate
– BUT: US has a larger central budget
Tom Verbeke
10
European Regional Policy
Tom Verbeke
11
European Regional Policy

Structural Funds
– European Regional Development Fund
– European Social Fund
– EAGGF-Guidance
– Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance
Tom Verbeke
12
European Regional Policy

Structural funds were given the task
collectively to attain six priority objectives:
– Objective 1: ERDF, ESF, EAGGF and FIFG
– Objective 2: ERDF and ESF
– Objective 3
 Long term unemployment
 Facilitating the integration of young people
 ESF
Tom Verbeke
13
European Regional Policy
– Objective 4:


Facilitating the adaptation of workers to industrial changes and
to changes in production systems
ESF
– Objective 5:


(a) adjustment of agricultural structures (EAGGF and FIFG)
(b) development and structural adjustment (ERDF, ESF and
EFGGF)
– Objective 6: extremely low population density (ERDF,
ESF, EAGGF and FIFG)
Tom Verbeke
14
European Regional Policy
Objective
1994-9 Budget
93.972
15.360
15.180
6.919
6.862
0.697
14.051
1
2
3&4
5a
5b
6
Community Initiatives
Tom Verbeke
15
European Regional Policy

Community initiatives have been wide
ranging and included: designed to tackle
specific problems
–
–
–
–
–
RECHAR (coal mining areas)
RESIDER (iron and steel areas)
PESCA (fishing communities)
INTERREG (cross-border initiatives)
...
Tom Verbeke
16
European Regional Policy

Cohesion Fund
– Assist NATIONS with a GDP of less then 90%
of average EUROPEAN GDP
– Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain
– 3 billion EURO’s in 1999
Tom Verbeke
17
European Regional Policy

4 principles of EU Regional Policy
– Multi-annual programs
– Partnership
– Subsidiarity
– Additionality
Tom Verbeke
18
European Regional Policy
– Assistance through multi-annual programmes
 Key to the development of each programme is the
drawing up of a Single Programming Document
(SPD) or Community Support Framework (CSF)
– Strategic plans
– Responsibility of the regional and local organisations
– Contains an analysis of the strenghts and weaknesses of
the region together with a development strategy and an
analysis of how it should be financed
– Typically a group of projects
Tom Verbeke
19
European Regional Policy

Partnership
– The EU is committed to the maximum
devolution of power (subsidiarity)
– Strong dialogues between all partners at all
levels

Additionality
– Some governments have been accused of
responding to EU funding with cutting back
own expenditure
Tom Verbeke
20
European Regional Policy

ERP and the future
– Enlargement:
 Challenge to the structural funds:
– Virtually all of the CEEC countries are eligible for the
highest rates of the structural funds (only two regions had
GDP per capital in excess of 75% of EU average: Prague
and Bratislava)

Challenge to the CAP
– Countries such as Poland and Hungary have large
agricultural activities in those areas with high intervention
prices
Tom Verbeke
21
European Regional Policy


Estimated extra costs for the structural funds: 13
billion ECU per annum
Financial perspective 2000-6 (Berlin)
– Pre-accession aid: 3.12 billion EURO untill
2006
– Post-accession allocations


Start at billion 6.45 billion EURO per annum
Rise to 16.78 billion EURO by 2006
Tom Verbeke
22
European Regional Policy

Changes to the current system
– Reduction in the areas eligible for assistance
 The 6 priority objectives have been cut back to three
– New Objective 1: Lagging regions
• Old Objective 1
• Objective 6
• Coverage has dropped from 25% to 20% of the
population of EU15
Tom Verbeke
23
European Regional Policy
– New Objective 2: Economic and social conversion of
Regions in Structural crisis
• Coverage is reduced from 25% to 18% of the
population of the EU15
– New Objective 3: Human resources
• Objective 3 and 4
• Regions not covered by objective 1 and 2

Community initiatives have been reduced from 13 to
3 and their budget from 9% to 5%
Tom Verbeke
24
European Regional Policy

EMU:
– Convergence criteria
 Edinburgh Summit: increase structural funding
 Add Cohesion Fund
– 2000-...
 Structural funds will have to cope with regional
impacts of eastern enlargement as well as with the
impact of the new strains imposed by the full
monetary union
Tom Verbeke
25
European Regional Policy

The issue of under-funding
– Structural funds are small: 0,46% of European GDP
– No redistributive transfers

Australia, Canada, Switserland or the US: about 40% of
regional income differentials are eliminated through regional
transfers
– Equalisation of disparities of equal opportunities

Given the issue of under-funding what should the primary task
of European Regional Policy be:
– A policy designed to prop up depressed areas
– A policy designed to allow depressed areas to compete on an
equal footing with other areas
Tom Verbeke
26