Slides - IPTS

Download Report

Transcript Slides - IPTS

Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence (SWAMI)
: "Dark" scenarios
SWAMI FINAL CONFERENCE
22nd March 2006 – Brussels
I. Maghiros, Y. Punie, S. Delaitre
1
Introduction
AmI vision
 The promise: embedded intelligence that works (cost/efficiency)
 The challenge: manage vast amounts of linkable heterogeneous data
 The risk: serious potential threats, far beyond what is known today
Objective
SWAMI scenarios: Identify important things that can go wrong
with regard to identity, privacy, security, …
Discuss social, economic, legal, technological and ethical implications
Why dark scenarios
 To contrast the predominance of ‘bright’ scenarios
 Alternative vision of the future we do NOT want to materialise
 However, these are NOT doom scenarios
2
Dark (adverse) scenarios
Characteristics
 Realistic although fictional (extrapolate from current trends)
 Description of plausible futures (non-traditional extrapolations)
 A tool for stimulating debate, structuring thinking, ‘what if’ games,
aiding in synthesis, and raising awareness intuitively
 Highlight potential vulnerabilities and associated threats
 Expose key socio-economic, legal, technological, ethical risks
 Identify challenges related to identity, privacy and security
 Alert policy makers as to the need to develop safeguards
3
SWAMI Scenario Approach
Literature review
Experts workshop
Technology check
Internal workshop
Drafting scenarios
Reality check
Scenario stories
Scenario analysis
AmI technologies
Situations
4
AmI applications
Issues
Drivers
Legal
SWAMI dark scenarios
Individual / micro level
Scenario 1: A typical family
(at home, at work, outdoors)
Private Sphere / Private concerns
Scenario 3: Corporate Boardroom
& court-case
(data aggregator)
Scenario 2: Seniors on a journey
(travel and health issues)
Public Sphere / Public concerns
Scenario 4: Risk Society
(Digital Divide, environment,
traffic & crowd management)
Society / macro level
5
Dark scenario 1: A Typical Family
Story overview
 A typical family in 3 different but blurring environments at Home, at
Work and also outdoors, making use of AmI devices and services.
System vulnerabilities and crime opportunities are exploited as the
family leads an everyday life.
Different scenes
 Scene 1 – At Home: Digital blackmail, unfounded suspicions due to
extensive profiling, impacts on work and home environments.
 Scene 2 – At Work: Shopping while at work, data laundering,
accidental mistake and consequences.
 Scene 3 – At the Park: Location-based advertising, irritation,
consequences, dependence on AmI, exclusion; erroneous identification,
AmI facilitated crime, usability/costs.
6
Dark scenario 2: Seniors on a journey
Story overview
 Focuses on senior citizens and their health related needs while on a
bus tour abroad. An exploited vulnerability in the traffic system causes
an accident, raising many different issues such as: individual needs vs.
economies of scale; reliance on AmI infrastructure; equal and fair
access, usability and accessibility principles.
Different scenes
 Scene 1 - News from the police report: Senior citizen dies after bus accident
 Scene 2 - Travel preparation and check-in procedure for public transportation
 Scene 3 - Traffic supported by ambient intelligence
 Scene 4 - Emergency situation
 Scene 5 - Ambient intelligence and medical care
7
Dark scenario 3: Corporate Boardroom
Story overview
 A ‘Data Aggregator’ successfully corners the data market for public
and private sector clients until their business model is exposed to
society-at-large through insider data theft, and fraudulent data use.
Media reports uncover the scandal and a court case puts a stop to
abuse. However, it will take the victims much more time to gain
control over their personal data that have been exposed.
Different scenes
 Scene 1 – Management Board Meeting: data aggregation and mining,
data theft, dependency on AmI infrastructure, risks in business setting.
 Scene 2 – The Court case: future legal framework does not allow
misuse of abuse of data collected, democratic principles prevail.
8
Dark scenario 4: Risk Society
Story overview
 Different stories on likely adverse consequences of AmI for society at
large including public action against personalised profiling, global
scale digital environmental divides and public life disruptions. In all
cases AmI diffusion is both widening and bridging existing gaps.
Different scenes
 Scene 1 – The Anti-Personalised Profiling Action Group (APPAG).
 Scene 2 – AmI Divides
 Scene 3 – Public Life Disrupted by Virus Attack
 Scene 4 - AmI-system aided mass risk management
9
Contents of Dark scenarios
DarkScen1
DarkScen2
DarkScen3
Sensors / actuators;
interfaces; comms;
Health monitoring
devices.
Biometrics; displays;
voice activated cmds;
surveillance; location
implants; RFIDs;
sensors & actuators.
Smart dust;
positioning sensors;
data mining; traffic
routing; comms
networks.
Applications
Security; spy ware;
surveillance;
tracking/monitoring
LBS, DRM.
Communication
Mngt system;
support for elderly;
health monitoring
systems.
Immigration control;
personalisation;
profiling; targeted
marketing; counterterrorism.
Personalisation;
environmental
monitoring; security;
anti-virus; crowd
management.
Issues
Loss of control;
disproportionate
reactions due to
profiling; exclusion,
human factors in
security.
Dependence; loss of
control; privacy;
exclusion; complex
risk assessment;
identity; crime;
Power Concentration;
illusion of security;
digital divide; trust;
differences in legal
regimes.
Personalised vs.
group profiling;
victimisation; digital
divide; loss of control;
dependency.
Embedded tags;
Technologies/ home sensors;
biometrics;
Devices
personal wrist
communicator
10
DarkScen4
Dark scenarios: Conclusions (1/3)
Varied, Wide and Deep Issues
 Varied because of AmI infrastructure touches upon all aspects and areas :
work, transport, health, entertainment, private life, business, political etc.
 Wide because dark situations can encompass “dark feelings” (ranging
from irksome to burdensome; and entail annoyance and embarrassment)
but also “dark experiences” such as theft, harassment, accidents etc.
 Deep because the impact can be severe (e.g. digital divide) and difficult to
revoke (e.g. profiling, ID Theft)
Varied & Context dependent Safeguards
 Varied: political, economic, social, legal, technological involving different
stakeholders
 Context dependent especially in terms of multi – stakeholder involvement
11
Dark scenarios: Conclusions (2/3)
Key SWAMI Issues








Privacy
Identity
Security
Trust
Loss of Control
Dependency
Exclusion
Victimisation
12
There are obvious advantages to
AmI space although intelligence
lies firmly with people.
Impact on personal life is likely to
be much greater than what we
perceive it to be today.
Zero-risk is not possible.
Dark scenarios: Conclusions (3/3)
Methodological Issues
 Successfully highlighted potential vulnerabilities & associated threats
 Detailed analysis of situation as to technologies/devices, applications,
drivers, issues, legal analysis.
 Raises awareness as to possible incentives, contextual and trust factors
 More than appealing scripts: ‘reality and technology’ checks.
 However, ‘delicate’ exercise (prospective research).
 Need to handle known weakness:
 few qualitatively new risks identified
 current behavioural patterns may induce more risk in tomorrow’s AmI world
13
Thank you !
Any Questions ?
Contact Details
Ioannis Maghiros
Project Officer
EC – DG JRC – IPTS – Seville
[email protected]
14