Recommending a Strategy
Download
Report
Transcript Recommending a Strategy
Economics 216:
The Macroeconomics of Development
Lawrence J. Lau, Ph. D., D. Soc. Sc. (hon.)
Kwoh-Ting Li Professor of Economic Development
Department of Economics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-6072, U.S.A.
Spring 2000-2001
Email: [email protected]; WebPages: http://www.stanford.edu/~ljlau
Lecture 7
Two-Sector
Models of Economic Growth
Lawrence J. Lau, Ph. D., D. Soc. Sc. (hon.)
Kwoh-Ting Li Professor of Economic Development
Department of Economics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-6072, U.S.A.
Spring 2000-2001
Email: [email protected]; WebPages: http://www.stanford.edu/~ljlau
Two-Sector Models of Economic Growth vs
Models of the Dual Economy
Two-Sector
Models: Consumption goods sector versus
Investment goods sector
Dual Economy Models: Agricultural (traditional) sector
versus Industrial (modern) sector
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
3
Two-Sector Models:
The Assumption of Non-Joint Production
Each
sector produces its output with its own exclusive
inputs--there is no joint production, no externality, no
spillover
Thus, Yi = Fi (Ki , Li), i = 1, 2
Production functions satisfy the assumptions of:
Monotonicity
Concavity
Constant
returns to scale
F(0, 0) = 0
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
4
The Assumption of Full Employment
There
is full employment of both capital and labor
Thus, K1 + K2 = K; L1 + L2 = L
The production possibility frontier in Y1-Y2 space for
given K and L is in general not a straight line
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
5
The Assumption of Perfectly Competitive
Output and Factor Markets
The
values of the marginal products of labor are equal to
the (single) wage rate
Zero
intersectoral wage differential
The
values of the marginal products of capital are equal to
the (single) rental rate of capital
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
6
The Assumptions of Perfect Mobility of Factors
Capital
and labor can be instantaneously reallocated from
one sector to the other
Identical
rates of depreciation of capital
No need for forward-looking assumptions (there are no mistakes
that cannot be instantaneously undone)
Alternative
assumptions:
Irreversibility
Putty-Clay
(ex ante substitutibility and ex post fixed coefficients)-vintage of the capital goods matters (vintage can also matter if
there is embodied technical progress)
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
7
Assumptions on Savings Behavior
Capitalists
save and workers consume
The
assumption of a constant proportion of profits saved will
have almost identical implications
Profits are reinvested entirely in investment goods; wages are
expended entirely on consumer goods
Alternative
assumption:
Savings
rate as a function of real output (per capita) and of the
rate of return on capital
Savings
behavior determines the outputs of the
consumption and investment goods
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
8
The Existence of
a Steady State Level of the Capital/Labor Ratio
Possible
instability in two-sector models
A sufficient (but not necessary) condition for stability is
the “Capital-Intensity Hypothesis”:
At
the same factor prices, the optimal capital-labor ratio in the
consumption goods sector is higher than the optimal capital-labor
ratio in the investment goods sector
An
exogenous rate of growth of population
Labor-augmenting technical progress (identical across the
two sectors)
Solow (1961)
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
9
Models of the Dual Economy:
Economic Development with Surplus Labor
W. Arthur Lewis (1954), Gustav Ranis and John C. H. Fei (1961),
Dale W. Jorgenson (1961)
Output of the agricultural sector depends only on the quantities of
labor and land (which is assumed to be fixed)
Marginal product of labor = 0 in the agricultural sector
Labor is paid the (institutionally determined) minimum subsistence
real wage w/P1
Output of the industrial sector depends on the quantities of capital
and labor
For given quantity of capital in the industrial sector, labor is
employed in the industrial sector until the value of its marginal
product is equal to w, the minimum subsistence wage rate (> 0)
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
10
The Assumption of Zero Marginal Productivity
of Labor in the Agricultural Sector
Is
it true?
Seasonality in the demand for agricultural labor
Qualitatively what is important about the assumption is
that agricultural output is not appreciably reduced with the
migration of labor from the agricultural sector and that the
real wage rate in the agricultural sector is unaffected by the
migration (hence labor during the labor-surplus phase is
paid more than its marginal product in agriculture)
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
11
The Evolution of a Labor-Surplus Economy
In
the base period there is only an agricultural sector
The economy is in long-run steady-state equilibrium:
Average
real output per capita is equal to the minimum
subsistence real wage
All output is consumed
There is no saving, no investment, and no capital accumulation
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
12
An Exogenous Increase
in Agricultural Output per Capita
Technical progress (green revolution), land reform, demographic
change (epidemic, famine, or war), or foreign aid
Excess output over subsistence consumption is invested in the
industrial sector (either by the “landlords” or by the government)
Labor is transferred from the agricultural sector to the industrial
sector until the value of the marginal product of labor is equal to the
minimum subsistence wage rate in the industrial sector (a wage gap
is possible, e.g., cost of living differential, expected wage rate taking
into account the possibility of unemployment, efficiency wage in the
industrial sector)
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
13
Capital Accumulation
Agricultural
surplus further increases because of the
movement of labor from the agricultural sector to the
industrial sector (without a decline in agricultural output)
Profits in the industrial sector are assumed to be saved and
invested in the industrial sector
Industrial workers consume only agricultural wage goods
Movement of labor continues from the agricultural sector
to the industrial sector until the marginal product of labor
increases from zero to the minimum subsistence real wage
in the agricultural sector
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
14
The End of the Labor-Surplus Phase
Once
the marginal productivity of labor in the agricultural
sector rises above the minimum subsistence real wage, the
wage rate faced by the industrial sector will begin to rise
Labor’s share in the industrial sector will now exceed
minimum subsistence consumption
Part of industrial output will begin to be consumed
Per capita real consumption will begin to rise—prior to this
point all increases in output are assumed to be saved—a
plausible assumption
Agricultural surplus will begin to diminish
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
15
Refinements
Models
of internal migration (Harris-Todaro)
Capital in agricultural production
Terms of trade between the agricultural and industrial
sectors
Inter-sectoral intermediate inputs
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
16
Multi-Sectoral Models of Growth
Balanced
growth in steady state (Von Neumann)
Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford University
17