Performance Budgeting Lessons from OECD Member countries
Download
Report
Transcript Performance Budgeting Lessons from OECD Member countries
Budgeting in Chile
Santiago de Chile, 26 January 2005
Jón R. Blöndal
Deputy Head of Division
Budgeting and Management Division
OECD Country Reviews
One of the core activities of the OECD
Chile is observer at the OECD
Review conducted by the Secretariat in 2003
Examined at the 2004 OECD meeting of budget directors
Agenda
Sound public finances
Tumultuous political history
Private provision of traditional public services
Structural budget surplus rule
Bidding fund
Role of Ministry of Finance
Role of Parliament
Transparency
Sound public finances
Very low debt levels – circa 15% of GDP
Strong record of budget surpluses over time
Tumultuous political history
Economic malaise in the 1970’s used as a pretext by the
military for overthrowing the democratic government
Unstable political situation following return to
democracy
Experience of neighbouring countries
Private provision of
traditional public services
Headline expenditures ~ 20% of GDP
Private provision of “traditional” expenditure ~ 11% of
GDP
Mandatory pensions: 10% + 2-3% of pay
Mandatory health contributions: 7% of pay
Mandatory unemployment insurance: 1.6% of pay
Significant use of PPP’s
Contingent liabilities
Structural Budget Surplus Rule
To formalize fiscal prudence
To increase fiscal predictability
To operate counter-cyclical fiscal policy
1% of GDP
Independent panels
In-year adjustments to maintain it
Calculations of structural balance not considered an issue
Bidding Fund
Mechanism for financing new initiatives
– About 2½ percent of total spending
– Financed from critical review of existing programs and from growth in
economy
To improve quality of budget submissions
– Spending ministries rank their own bids
– Technical quality
Consistency with political priorities
Role of Ministry of Finance
Centralised budget process
– Strong Ministry of Finance
– Line-ministries not pro-active
– Risky ?
Attempt to change this are underway
– Ministries and agencies
Role of Parliament
Historically, a strong parliament
– Civil war fought over its role in the budget process in the late 1800’s
– Irresponsible fiscal behaviour
Today, a very weak parliament
– Constitutional restrictions
– No political will for stronger parliament
Transparency
No budgetary information made available during military rule
– A difficult legacy to overcome
Great progress has already been made and the government is
committed to further improvements
– Formal agreement between the executive and the Congress to
implement the OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency
Conclusion
“An innovative and sophisticated budget process that is
focused on maintaining aggregate fiscal discipline.”
For further information
www.oecd.org/gov/budget
OECD Journal on Budgeting
[email protected]