Trade Capacity Building in Sub-Saharan Africa: Impact and
Download
Report
Transcript Trade Capacity Building in Sub-Saharan Africa: Impact and
Private Capital Flows to Africa: Opportunities,
Risks and Way Forward
Patrick N. Osakwe
UN Economic Commission for Africa
1
I. Background
The most important challenge facing Africa is how to
eradicate poverty and extreme hunger
Africa is still the region with the highest percentage of
people in extreme poverty and deprivation
The 2007 MDG Report indicates that it is the only
region at risk of not meeting any of the MDGs.
Mobilization of finance is crucial to reversing the current
trend and increasing the likelihood of African countries
meeting the MDGs by the target date.
2
World leaders recognized the importance of finance in
meeting the MDGs when they adopted the Monterrey
Consensus in 2002
The mobilization of private capital flows is one of the six core
areas of the Monterrey Consensus.
Mobilization of domestic resources for development
Mobilization of international financial resources (Private Capital Flows)
Promoting international trade as an engine of development
Increasing international financial and technical cooperation for
development
External debt
Systemic issues
3
II. Forms of Private Capital Flows
Equity Flows
FDI (equity stake with control)
Portfolio investment (equity stake without control)
Debt Flows
Bank loans
Bonds
4
Trends in Private Capital Flows (US$ billion)
1998
2000
2005
Developing
countries
193.4
187
551.4
East Asia &
the Pacific
6.5
28.8
169.7
Middle East &
North Africa
9.2
3.9
24.3
Sub-Saharan
Africa
13.9
10.2
29.6
5
Private Capital Flows to North Africa (billion $)
1990
2005
Net FDI Inflows
0.96
11.2
Portfolio Equity
0.01
0.80
Net Debt Flows
-0.52
3.14
Worker’s Remittances
7.25
13.97
6
III. Theoretical Arguments for Capital Mobility
Lifts the constraints on domestic investment
imposed by low national savings
Leads to more efficient allocation of resources
Allows countries to smooth consumption over time
Borrow during a negative shock and repay during a positive shock
thereby making consumption less volatile than income
In practice investors are reluctant to lend to developing countries
experiencing negative shocks (case of Chile in 1998)
7
Permits domestic residents to diversify risks through holding
diversified international portfolios
Risks are less correlated between countries than within countries
Provides access to intellectual property
Technological know-how
Managerial expertise
Access to foreign markets
It subjects countries to the discipline of the international
market
Fear of capital flow reversal is often a stimulus to more responsible
economic policies
8
IV. Concerns about Capital Mobility
Capital mobility increases macroeconomic volatility and this
has negative consequences for an economy
Exposes countries to new shocks (external)
Can magnify the effect of domestic shocks
It increases vulnerability to large and rapid reversals of
capital flows (often leading to financial crises)
These crises are very costly. In the case of East Asia it led to losses of
more than 10 percent of GDP.
Large inflows resulting from capital mobility also contribute to
real exchange rate appreciation and loss of competitiveness
9
V. The Evidence
The key question here is whether the benefits of capital
mobility offset the costs? The evidence is mixed
Several studies found no evidence that capital account
liberalization leads to faster growth (Rodrik 1998; Kraay 1998;
Edison 2002; Prasad et al 2003)
Few studies found that liberalization had a positive impact (Quinn
1997)
There are several messages from these results
If there is a relationship between capital mobility and growth, it is
neither strong nor robust
The composition of capital flows as well as domestic economic
conditions may be important in determining whether or not capital
mobility has a positive impact on an economy.
10
VI. Managing Capital Flows: The Way Forward
The benefits of capital mobility are not automatic.
They accrue to countries that have taken appropriate steps to
exploit them
The key policy challenge facing African countries is
how to maximize the benefits and minimize the
costs.
This requires several actions at the national level
11
Adopting a gradual approach to capital account
liberalization. This gives room for
Development of financial infrastructure
Complementary investments in education and physical
infrastructure to increase absorptive capacity of flows
Paying more attention to the composition of capital
flows and ensuring that they go to sectors with high
potential for employment creation
Putting in place policies to limit vulnerability to
financial crises
Sound Macroeconomic Policies
Protection of property rights and the rule of law
Political stability
12
Managing capital flows to avoid risk of real
exchange rate appreciations that lead to loss
of competitiveness
Adoption of exchange rate regimes that give room for
dealing with capital flows
Use of selective capital controls when necessary
13
THANK
YOU
14