Transcript Inequality and Instability - The Dallas Philosophers Forum

Is Capitalism Unstable?
What is the Price of Inequality?
• The gains at the top are far less than the
loses at the bottom and middle.
• Slower growth
• Lower GDP
• More instability
• More Unemployment
• Weakened Democracy
• Diminished sense of fairness and justice
• Questioning of our sense of identity
Arguments Favoring Status Quo
• There is an equality – efficiency tradeoff!
• Inequality is the inevitable consequence of any
incentive system adopted to make the economy work.
• Any redistribution necessarily attenuates incentives.
• What we have is equality of opportunity.
• Any government interference will result in diminishing
tax revenues thus hurting everyone.
What is Capitalism?
• Webster defined capitalism as “an economic
system characterized by private or corporation
ownership of capital goods, by investments
that are determined by private decision rather
than state control, and by prices, production,
and the distribution of goods that are
determined in a free market.”
What is Capitalism?
(from Wikipedia)
• Capitalism is defined as a social and economic
system where capital assets are mainly owned
and controlled by private persons, where labor is
purchased for money wages, capital gains accrue
to private owners, and the price mechanism is
utilized to allocate capital goods between uses.
• The extent to which the price mechanism is used,
the degree of competitiveness, and government
intervention in markets distinguish exact forms of
capitalism.
What is Capitalism?
(from Wikipedia)
• There are different variations of capitalism which have
different relationships to markets and the state.
– In free-market and Laissez-faire forms of capitalism,
markets are utilized most extensively with minimal or no
regulation over the pricing mechanism.
– In interventionist and mixed economies, markets continue
to play a dominant role but are regulated to some extent
by government in order to correct market failures, promote
social welfare, conserve natural resources, and fund
defense and public safety.
– In state capitalist systems, markets are relied upon the
least, with the state relying heavily on state-owned
enterprises or indirect economic planning to accumulate
capital.
Ideal Capitalism
• In this view, Property belongs to citizens, not to
governments. People should be allowed to keep
what they earn.
• The profit motive should be allowed free reign.
• Regulation and taxation, especially progressive
taxation, are illegitimate government interventions
and lead to a less efficient market place.
• “Government is not the solution; government is
the problem!”
Traditional Capitalism Died
(in the 1920’s and 1930’s)
• Russia, China, and East Asia went to
Communism.
• Central Europe, Italy, Spain, and Japan went to
Fascism.
• U.S., Scandinavian countries, and British Empire
went to the welfare state.
• Many emerging countries remained
underdeveloped with warlords and dictatorships.
Assumption of Stable Equilibrium
• Adam Smith, following Newton and Quesnay,
– Assumed stable equilibria necessary to have a science.
– But Smith knew that government had to be involved to
guarantee continuance of capitalism.
• Every Econ 101 Course.
– Price is assumed to be stable at the equilibrium where supply =
demand. Not permanently fixed; but for any given supply and
demand there is one equilibrium price.
– If not, things get messy and we don’t want to talk about that.
• So non-stable or situations without equilibrium just didn’t get much
attention or interest.
• Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium models replaced other
equilibrium models.
Assumption of Stable Equilibrium
• For Milton Friedman stability was a matter of
keeping the Gov. & the Fed from interfering.
– But then how do you explain the Great Depression.
– The answer was an exogenous shock of mismanagement
of the money supply.
• Alan Greenspan thought the economic markets
were stable and would automatically adjust.
– After the recent melt down he acknowledged the error.
• Almost every major contributor to macroeconomics
knew that real economies are not stable.
What is Stability?
Diagram from Irrational Exuberance by Robert Shiller, 2005
What is Stability?
Diagram from stockcharts.com 2011
So Instability is
• The presence of any condition or process which
drives some necessary aspect of the economy
off a cliff into destruction or into subsidence
from which it seems unable to recover.
• Any perturbation which causes increasing
fluctuations without limit.
Australian Current Accounts ($A mill.)
Current Account Debt (1980 – 2008)
The Debt to GDP Ratio?
• Ken Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart published an empirical study
titled “Growth in a Time of Debt” in 2010. They found that
there was a tipping point when debt reached 90% of GDP. At
that point growth tended to become negative, i.e. – countries
fall into recession.
• However, Thomas Herndon, in a paper for his econometric
class, discovered an error in the spreadsheet which cut out 5
relevant countries. Fixing the error changed the growth rate
from -0.1 to +2.2% which is about the same as other countries
and which totally eliminates the “tipping point.”
• Thus a major argument for the austerity approach is eliminated.
How the Multiplier Works
Assuming Propensity to Spend = .8; the Multiplier = 5.
If the Government gives me $100
I spend $80 for groceries.
The store mgr. spends $54 for
plumbing repairs.
The Plumber spends $43.20 for shoes.
Totals:
I save $20 at the bank.
She saves $16.
He saves $10.80.
$34.56…
Etc.
$8.64
$500
$100
Etc.
•
•
•
•
“IMF Chief Economist, Olivier Blanchard and colleague Daniel Leigh, released a working
paper that has been seen as an unofficial apology. The paper shows how fiscal multipliers
were consistently and severely underestimated in many of the economic growth forecasts
of 2010. The underestimation of these multipliers led to projections from economist’s
models that also underestimated the potentially negative impacts of austerity measures.”
The new research from the IMF’s chief economist shows that in 2010, most economists
failed to see how adverse those austerity measures would be on the European economies
that were struggling to get their fiscal house in order. Most forecasters, including those at
the IMF, based their estimates on what fiscal multipliers had been in the past, causing
them to underestimate the multipliers.
Two years later, the Greek economy is still shrinking and unemployment is at 25 percent.”
The fund’s Chief Economist acknowledged the mistake in his paper, finding that the
average fiscal multiplier used was .5 when 1.5 was closer to the mark.
A recent econometric analysis by economists Alan Auerbach and Yuriy Gorodnichenko
found that fiscal multipliers in the United States fluctuate from near zero in normal times
to nearly 2.5 during a recession. In other words, a $1 cut in government spending that
would normally have little impact on economic output might result in as much as a $2.50
reduction in total economic output today
Kevin Buchnall’s Synthesis of
Classical and Keynesian Economics
Price Index
AD3 Boom
time
AD1
Depression
SAS is
the
curved
line
AD2
LAS
Real GDP
Working Hypotheses
• Capitalism generally involves somebody getting out more
money than they put in (profit). So capitalism, if successful, is
a money pump that increases the disparity between wealthy
and poor (unless the poor have money pumps that move
money from the rich).
• Some of us have acquired very efficient money pumps.
• Capitalist extraction by itself is unstable and leads to collapse.
• Government, by its transfer payments, has prevented collapse
so far. (Twice in the past 80 years we have been on the edge.)
• What government does is critical to survival of the system!
• This necessity is commonly misunderstood and threatened.
Extractive Politics produce Extractive
Economic Systems and vice versa
• Extractive political systems exist for the benefit of a narrow
elite, and create an extractive economic system. The masses
cannot influence the political system, and have no incentives to
exert themselves creating wealth that will be taken from them by
the political elites. This produces a big gap between rich and
poor and two kinds of failure: Collapse and the iron law of
oligarchy.
• History shapes this cycle. (e.g. Colonial extractionism)
• Sustained economic growth requires innovation which involves
creative destruction which threatens the dominant elite.
• In extractive situations, there is likely to be competition for
political power and therefore political & economic instability.
Evidence for Extractionism from
Well known Truisms
•
•
•
•
The rich get richer and the poor get children.
Money attracts money.
He who has will be given a lot more.
“The forces in a capitalist society, if left
unchecked, tend to make the rich richer and
the poor poorer.” Jawaharlal Nehru
• It takes money to make money.
Inclusive Politics produce Inclusive
Economic Systems and vice versa
• Inclusive political systems provide widely utilized incentives for people to
acquire skills, work hard, save, invest, and innovate and thereby profit.
This requires a strong central government that reflects the interests of
many. This tends to produce a more egalitarian and wealthy society.
• Inclusive economic institutions enforce property rights, create a level
playing field, encourage investments in new technologies and education
or training. Innovation and creative destruction are encouraged.
• History shapes the institutions of nations.
– The black death forced the collapse of the feudal serfdom in western Europe.
– The growth of Parliamentarianism broadened participation in politics and economics.
– English efforts to extract wealth from North America failed  more egalitarian soc.
• But this virtuous cycle is hard to start, rarely successful, and can be
corrupted by the growth of extractionism.
More on Extractionism
• David Cay Johnston, Free Lunch: How the
Wealthiest Americans enrich themselves at
Government Expense (and stick you with
the bill)
• Chrystia Freeland, Plutocrats: The Rise of
the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of
Everyone Else.
Extraction in America
• When sequestration affected the wealthy travelers, it was
fixed. But cancer patients, the elderly and the poor do without.
• The fight over 501(c) 4 organizations illustrates the political
and economic clout of the wealthy.
• Tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations.
• There is a continuing battle over free ISP’s in United States.
• No sales of cars in N. Carolina without brick & mortar stores.
• Efforts to cut Soc. Sec., Medicare, Medicaid, etc.
• Subsidies for rich corporations.
• Over 45,000 well paid lobbyists in Washington.
• The Paul Ryan Budget.
From a 2005 study by Larry M. Bartels
Current Issues
•
•
•
•
•
•
Debt
Finance
Wealth Concentration
Jobs (Employment)
Consumption and Production
Environment
Finance
•
•
•
•
•
•
Reckless provision of credit
Creation of dubious financial instruments
Collapse of housing and financial markets
Reluctance of lenders to lend
Reluctance of borrowers to borrow
These affect the concentration of wealth and
employment prospects.
Changes in wages and productivity
• Productivity has surged, but income and wages have
stagnated for most Americans. If the median household
income had kept pace with the economy since 1970, it
would now be nearly $92,000, not $50,000.
Wealth Concentration
• Along with economic power so also political power is
concentrated.
• We have witnessed great growth in profits without growth
in wages
• Erosion of fair and inclusive market rules
• Capture of government for benefit of the few
• Extractionism (Exploitation and exclusion of the poor)
• Manipulations of Democracy
• Erosion of opportunities for ownership and employment
Employment
• Lower consumption means layoffs.
• Leads to declining wages, skills, purchasing
power.
• This means lower consumption and therefore it
impacts investment and production.
• This is a vicious cycle (i.e. – Instability)
The Triffin Dilemma
• The use of a national currency (i.e. the U.S. dollar)
as global reserve currency leads to a tension
between national monetary policy and global
monetary policy. This is reflected in fundamental
imbalances in the balance of payments,
specifically the current account: some goals
require an overall flow of dollars out of the United
States, while others require an overall flow of
dollars into the United States.
The Triffin Dilemma (source: IMF)
• If the United States stopped running balance of payments
deficits, the international community would lose its largest
source of additions to reserves. The resulting shortage of
liquidity could pull the world economy into a contractionary
spiral, leading to instability.
• If U.S. deficits continued, a steady stream of dollars would
continue to fuel world economic growth. However,
excessive U.S. deficits (dollar glut) would erode confidence
in the value of the U.S. dollar. Without confidence in the
dollar, it would no longer be accepted as the world's
reserve currency. The fixed exchange rate system could
break down, leading to instability.
Mundell’s Trilemma
• It is not possible to have monetary
independence, free movement of capital,
and stable currency exchange rates.
• You must either let your currency float, or
attempt to prevent currency from moving in
or out of the country, or let someone else
run your monetary policies.
Recent Versions of Mundell’s
Trilemma
• Dani Rodrik’s version is that “democracy,
national sovereignty, and global economic
integration are mutually incompatible.”
• Ashok Bardhan makes it a tettralemma. “It
is difficult to see how tenuous co-habitation
of these four – globalization, free market
principles, democracy, and national policy
independence – can survive in the present
circumstances.”
James Galbraith found weak correlations
between political party and perceptions of
equality
• Those who perceive their world as roughly
egalitarian tend to vote Republican.
• Those who perceive it otherwise, tend to vote
Democratic or not to vote at all.
Galbraithian Results
• But Republican policies increase inequality.
• While Democratic policies increase equality.
• These are negative feedback loops which tend
to produce a stable division of the country
right down the middle.
More Galbraithian Results
• Empirical studies show that Inequality in
income leads to increased unemployment,
which leads to increased inequality of income.
• This is a vicious cycle leading to economic [and
political] instability.
• Galbraith’s book Inequality and Instability was
published in 2012. But it is mostly a collection
of articles previously published before 2008.
Wilkinson and Pickett
• In The Spirit Level, Wilkinson & Pickett chart data that show
societies that are more equal are healthier, happier societies.
• They show that the relevant variable is not absolute wealth or
income, but variation (inequality) of income within a nation.
• What gets worse when rich and poor are too far apart? Health,
lifespan, illiteracy, infant mortality, homicides, imprisonment,
teenage births, obesity, mental illness, UNICEF index of child
wellbeing, social mobility, even such basic values as trust.
• And what is damaged is not just the outcome for the poor, but
for everyone including the rich.
Death rates per 100,000 among working age
men by social class of occupation.
England & Wales
Sweden
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Unskilled
Professional
FDI &
Outsourc
ing
Waste
Fraud &
Abuse
Offshore
Bank
Accounts
Hedge
Funds &
Currency
Spec
Financial (Non-Home) Wealth
(Source: E. N. Wolff@NYU)
Financial (Non-Home) Wealth
1983
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
2007
2010
Top 1 percent
Next 19 percent
Bottom 80
percent
42.9%
46.9%
45.6%
47.2%
47.3%
39.7%
42.2%
42.7%
42.1%
48.4%
46.5%
46.7%
45.9%
43.6%
51.5%
50.3%
50.3%
53.5%
8.7%
6.6%
7.7%
7.0%
9.1%
8.7%
7.5%
7.0%
4.7%
PEW Research: 2013