Transcript Ethics 2.1 Ital tax (relativism again)

Donaldson (p471)
23
Cultural relativism
• This is the empirical fact that cultures differ, common practice or
socially acceptable behavior in one culture or society might not be
in another
Ethical (moral) relativsim
• This is the philosophical normative position that different moral rules
should apply in different societies. It is best understood by
contrasting with ethical absolutism, which is the idea that there is
one set of moral rules for all humankind, but it just takes some
societies a longer time to realise this and to behave properly
Several Inter-related Conflicts
• Conflict of cultural tradition (e.g. Ellen Moore case)
• Related conflicts of relative development. (e.g. wage rates,
employment decisions, product safety rules in LDCs
• Related conflicts about political values eg capitalism vs alternatives,
eg patenting of agricultural products, etc
23
Cultural relativism is expressed by “When in Rome do as the Romans
do”
• A US computer co. in Saudi Arabia gave harrassment training. It
seemed highly out of place, not well received, Why?
• In India, it made sense to offer a job to the employees’ child (even if
another more qualified) In order to keeps families together.
• gift giving and bribery are viewed differently in US and Japan (e.g.
the infamous Lockheed scandal led to the FCPA in USA.
• In the Shell case: the above proverb seems irrelevant. Why?
Donaldson notes the need to balance:
• core human values / minimal ethical standards, ie hyper- norms
• respect for local traditions
Since the context is important, here is a “Moral free space” where good
judgement is needed
Donaldson (cont.) & the “Asian values” debate
So called “Asian values” have Western counterparts, some of which are
in tension with US/UK style capitalism
•
•
•
•
Kyosie (common good),
Dhama, (inherited duty)
Santutthi (limit desires),
Zakat (help poor)
Confucian ideas are quite similar to Plato’s, but he emphasised loyalty
within family (filial piety) and harmony as “human goods”
Loyalty can now be problematic: loyalty to whom? when to “whistleblow”?
• Harmony: still very relevant e.g. balanced scorecard, synthsis and
multi-capital synergy (profit, employees, environment).
• There are many media stories about “Confucian capitalism and
Kantian capitalism. What do these phrases mean?
23