Personal, Social, and Moral Development
Download
Report
Transcript Personal, Social, and Moral Development
Personal, Social, and Moral
Development
Chapter 3
(2)
Autonomy vs
Shame &
Doubt:
Control
(1)
Trust vs.
Mistrust:
Consistency
(5)
Identity vs Role
Confusion
Moratotium
Self understanding
Marcia’s:
Identity achievement
Identity foreclosure
Identity diffusion
Moratorium
(6)
Intimacy vs
Isolation:
Trust others
(3)
Initiative vs
Guilt:
Independence
with supervision
(4)
Industry
vs. Inferiority
feedback
(7)
Generativity
vs. Stagnation
Next generation
(8)
Ego integrity
vs Despair
Accept cycle
of Death
• Families:
– Blended families
– Parenting styles
•
•
•
•
Authoritarian
Authoritative
Permissive
Rejecting/neglecting
– Peers
• Cultures
• Aggression:
–
–
–
–
Instrumental
Hostile
Overt
Relational
• Bulliesviolence will be rewarded
• Victims low self esteem
Helping Children of Divorce
• Sudden changes
• Talk individually to students
• Avoid stereotypes (whole family
references)blended families
• Maintain students’ self-esteem
• Resources available for counseling
• Sensitive to both parents’ rights
What is something you should do when you
see violence in the classroom?
Peer Relationships
• Peers play an essential
role in healthy personal
and social relationships
– Characteristics of friends
– Quality of friendships
• Who is likely to have
problems with peers?
– Children who differ from
the norm
• Peer culture:
– Rules
– Conformity to those rules
– Interests of parents clash
with those rules
• New Roles for Teachers
– Support personal and social
development
Challenges for Children
Young children starting school preoperational to
concrete operationalteaching must adhere to the
needs of that stage
Coping with challenges
By third grade predictions towards dropping out
Importance of Head Start
Children and Youth at Risk
Child Abuse:
Physical Abuse
Physical Neglect
Sexual Abuse
Eating Disorders
Drug Abuse
Suicide
Understanding Ourselves and Others
Self
Concept
General
Academic
Non-academic
Self
Esteem
Value one gives to their
evaluations
How does self esteem
affect student behavior in
school?
How does life in schools
affect student behavior?
Develops:
“constant
evaluations across Relationships with abilities
time”
Popularity
Elementaryothers
HSoneself
Feedback!!!
Gender, Ethnicity,
and Self Esteem
Diversity:
Collective self esteem
Ethnic Pride
Development:
Decreases as they
go middle school
Increases in boys as they go
to HS more than in girls
Self and others:
Intention (2 yrs)
Perspective taking (10 yrs)
Emotional Competency
Racial Identities (Nigrescence):
Pre-encounter
Encounter
Immersion
Internalization
Commitment
Could this
be applied
to the
Hispanic
community?
Ethnic Pride
Theory of Mind and Intentionunderstanding
other people
Perspective Taking
Selman (1980)
*Develops over time
*Analyze other’s perspective about age 10
*15 most have developed the perspective takingability
Moral Development = sense of right and wrong
Moral Dilemmas
Distributive Justice
Beliefs @
Dividing and
sharing
Moral Realism
Morality of Cooperation
Understanding that People
make rules – they can also
change them
Stage
Understanding
of rules
Preconventional: (personal needs and other people’s rules)
Punishment-obedience orientation
Personal reward orientation
Conventional: (approval, family expectations, traditional values, laws of
society, loyalty to the country)
Good boy-nice girl orientation
Law and order orientation
Postconventional:
Social contract orientation
Universal ethical principles orientation
• Moral vs. Conventional Domains
– Moral domain = more abstract integration
– Social integration = agreed upon rules and ways of doing things
in a particular situation
• Alternatives to Kohlberg’s Theory
– Stages not separate, sequenced and consistent
– Every day life (competing values, situations, etc)
– Stages 5 and 6 are based on Western values
• Gender Differences in Reasoning (Gilligan, 1982)
– Stages are biased in favor of males
differences in the development of
stages between men and women
– “Ethic of care” move from a focus
of self interest to moral reasoning
based on commitment to specific
individuals and relationships