Transcript lecture5

The Dialogue of Cultural Traditions:
a global perspective
Dialogue, Cultural Traditions and Ethics
Lecture 5
The Possibility of Moral Knowledge
William Sweet

Culture as ways of living, ways of
meaning, and ways of knowing

Relation of culture and traditions and
practices

Ethical traditions as cultural traditions

How to respond to challenges?



Criticism / response
Providing a positive view
Criteria:




Meaning
Truth
Relevance
Sufficient evidence
The tradition of reason and rationality

a) foundationalism

b) the turn to the subject

Its criticisms of religious and ‘tradition-based’ ethics

i) rationalist-based natural law

ii) Enlightenment (and post-Enlightenment)
rationalism and scepticism
Some contemporary ‘post modern’ approaches





Alasdair MacIntyre
Jurgen Habermas
John Rawls?
Kai Nielsen
Jean Ladriere?
Postmodern criticisms (a summary)

a) versus rationalism

b) versus anthropomorphism

c) versus essentialism, natures and natural laws,
universal character of morality

d) historicity
We cannot know nature or reality in itself
Truth is not a correspondence of thing to the world



And if it were, how does ‘morality’ fit with the world; what is?

There is no ‘ground’ for any of our beliefs

We can provide only explanations and narratives





There can be explanations, but they are made within a context
We can try to ‘awaken’ or ‘educate’ the sentiments
We can provide sentimental education
The aim is ‘solidarity’ in ethics
There is moral progress


Responding to post modern approaches
We can know reality




Not all opinions are ‘on a par’
There is a purpose to sentimental education
We look for explanations of our feelings


footprints
Why are babies worth more than bugs?
Is solidarity ‘reasonable’?


Responding to skepticism
What is moral knowledge?



How do we acquire this knowledge?
Relation of moral theory and moral education
Why dialogue? What kind of dialogue?