Transcript past

Note:
The last part of chapter 1 (on clutch size) will be
considered after discussion of chapter 2 in a
topic “Life history trade-offs”
Focal animal sample
Time(min)
0:00
3:33
4:56
5:22
6:35
8:50
10:00
Behavior
sit
walk
fight
walk
rest
walk
Scan sample
Interval
0:00
0:30
1:00
etc...
samples must
be independent!
Individual
1
2
3
4
5
walkwalk fight fight walk
walkwalk walk walk ov
walk rest feed walk feed
4
1 2
3
4
5
1
2
3
Focal behavior sampling
Tally instances of aggressive acts over set time
Why do animals play?
Practice for learning adult skills
Play stimulates pleasure centers
Play is a side effect of high metabolism in
endotherms
Play enhances brain development
Are hypotheses mutually
exclusive?
So…are these hypotheses mutually exclusive?
You need to consider the approach of each
hypothesis, including ultimate vs. proximate
Why do animals play?
Practice for learning adult skills
Play stimulates pleasure centers
Play side effect of high metabolism in endotherms
Play enhances brain development
List independent, dependent variables
and how you investigate:
Existing variation in pop’ns
Experimentally produced variation
Comparison of species
When testing hypotheses
Just because a hypothesized function appears to
explain the behavior doesn’t mean that it is right.
Always consider alternative hypotheses and of
course you need to test hypotheses.
Understand causal (proximate )vs. functional
(ultimate) explanations
Also – remember we are seeing currently the
result of past selection.
Consider the hyena pseudopenis….
Consider the hyena pseudopenis….
Why a pseudopenis?
 Dominant females have high T and are
aggressive…they get the pp. from high T
Pp serves to signal to females and reduces
tensions among aggressive females during
‘greeting ceremony’
 Sperm choice by females
Moral: The function of a behavior/structure
presently may not explain why it evolved in the
past..
Over-adaptionism
Consider the example of driving in US vs. Britain.
drive on right
drive on left
Constraints on adaptation
Animals are often limited in what can possibly
evolve….another reason to avoid assuming
adaptation
Example: parental behavior in
mammals vs. birds
mammals nursing
Bird eggs
Comparative approach
Social behavior in weaver birds
Solitary, group territory, or colonial
Comparative approach
Crook (1964) Tried to find correlations
between ecology and nesting behavior
 Aspects of diet
 Food distribution
 Predation pressure
 Habitat
Weaver bird comparison
Comparative approach
 Food type and predation pressure explained nesting
behavior, mating system, sexual dimorphism
 Jarman (1974) similar approach with ungulates
 But there are issues with these early comparisons…
Home range size and diet in primates
Fruit/insectivores
Leaf-eating
Testis size vs. mating system
100
Multi-male
10
Testes
weight
Monogamous, or single male
1
1
10
100
Body weight
Comparing multi-species
Using a statistical approach w/quantifiable
variables is more powerful and objective
 Confounding variables
 Continuous scale
 Independence of data points
Pan t.
Pan pan.
100
Gorilla
10
Pongo
Testes
weight
Tamarins, marmosets
1
1
10
Body weight
100
Pan
100
Choosing genus instead of species level avoids
statistical bias towards groups with many species
Gorilla
10
Pongo
Testes
weight
Saguinus
Callitrix
1
1
10
100
Body weight
Independence by using ‘contrasts’
Instead of using pure species data for analysis,
use amount of difference (contrasts) between
species.