Transcript Chapter 4
News
Guns in National Parks
GSMNP
Python bounty hunters
Ecosystems
Ecology -- Interactions between living and
nonliving elements that sustain life
Biotic community
Ecosystem
Affected by external/internal factors
Perturbations
Fire, hurricanes, insects, over grazing, timbering
Anthropogenic or “natural”
All recovering from some past disturbance
Living parts of an ecosystem
Nothing is constant except change
Everything is connected to everything else
Limits difficult to define
Ecosystems
Perturbations (disturbance)
Anthropogenic
DDT killed bugs, but also thinned egg shells of
eagles, falcons, etc.
Chernobyl
10% fallout over Sweden
Lichens “radiation sponges”
Symbiotic fungus and algae
Wildlife haven??
Spills, atmospheric deposition
Natural? disturbance
Ecosystems
Scale
Large
Smaller
Longleaf pine forest
Regenerating stand
Smaller still
Biosphere
Biome
Single tree
Boundaries difficult to define
Ecosystems
Self sustaining?
Entropy
Second Law of Thermodynamics
Entropy is a measure of disorder (and order)
Entropy tends to increase over time
the higher the entropy the greater the disorder
Nature should inexorably degenerate toward a state of
greater disorder, greater entropy
So how are living systems ordered?
Energy is required
Ordering must be balanced with disorder (closed system)
Ecosystems must be open systems -- connected
Ecosystems
Cities don’t qualify as ecosystems?
Not self-sustaining?
But ecosystems couldn’t be sustained either
w/o a lot of energy input
Because they import a lot of energy
Raw materials transformed but little replenished
Wildfire transforms, does it replenish?
Do cities meet the definition of ecosystem?
If it takes a lot of human interference, then it’s not
an ecosystem?
Manipulate Ecosystems
Wildlife management intentionally
manipulates communities and
ecosystems (to achieve a goal)
That’s
why the chapter seems to focus on
disturbance
Matter and Energy
Carbon based
Photosynthesis
Organic chemistry
CO2 + H20 = sugars + O2
Galapagos Rift
Volcanic hydrothermal vents
Sulfur-based life
Chemoautotrophic bacteria
Hyperthermophiles
SLMEs
Subsurface lithoautotrophic microbial ecosystems
Food (Chains) Webs
All require energy and matter
Trophic levels
Primary producers - autotrophs
Plants
Consumers
Primary consumers
Secondary
Carnivore
Tertiary
Herbivores
Top level carnivores
Decomposers
Food (Chains) Webs
Trophic pyramid
Represent flow of energy
10% efficient
Biomass too
Inverted pyramid
Aquatic phytoplankton and zooplankton
Small biomass of autotrophs supports a large
mass of longer lived herbivores
Rapid turnover of autotrophs
Detritus based -- energy of mountain streams from outside
Can’t have a lot of top level carnivores
Energy Transfer
Less energy (per unit area) at each
level of the trophic pyramid
Plants
> Herbivores > Carnivores
Prey populations limit the number of
predators, not vise versa
Eat low on the food chain
Length of the food chain is limited
Energy Transfer
Isle Royale
1 kg wolf : 59 kg moose : 765 kg browse
Wolf = 50 kg Moose = 300 kg
Wolf needs to eat about 10 moose per wolf per year
Striper fisherman at Lake Norman
Want lots of large stripers
So they want to stock more stripers
Does this make any sense?
Range of Tolerance (Ecological
Amplitude)
Temperature, moisture, heat, salinity,…
Halophytes
Steno -- narrow
Stenophagus -- Everglades
Stenoky -- RCW
Eury -- wide
Eurythermal
Euroky
Euryphagus --
wild pigs
kite
Thermoneutral Zone
Zone of ambient temperature defined by
upper and lower critical limits. Within
this zone metabolism is at the basal
rate.
Outside
this range metabolism increases to
maintain body temperature.
Beaver example
Circadian rhythms
A circadian rhythm is an approximate daily
periodicity, a roughly 24-hour cycle in the
biochemical, physiological or behavioral
processes of living beings, including plants,
animals, fungi and cyanobacteria.
Circadian rhythms are endogenously
generated, and can be entrained by external
cues, called Zeitgebers. The primary one is
daylight.
Circadian rhythms
The rhythm is linked to the light-dark cycle.
Animals, including humans, kept in total
darkness for extended periods eventually
function with a freerunning rhythm. Each
"day," their sleep cycle is pushed back or
forward, depending on whether their
endogenous period is shorter or longer than
24 hours. The environmental cues that each
day reset the rhythms are called Zeitgebers
(from the German, Time Givers)
Niche
Animal’s “profession” Habitat “address”
Multidimensional hyperspace
Generalists vs. specialists
Spruce grouse -- winter diet jack pine needles
Ruffed grouse -- aspen catkins
Ecological equivalent
Euroky vs. stenoky
Sympatric species
Climatograph 2 dimensions (temp, rain)
Capercaillie -- Scot’s pine in Europe
Robin vs. Woodcock
Niche
Damaged ecosystems
Do
they have the original niches?
Two species cannot occupy the same
niche at same place and time
Empty niche?
Exotic
species
Feral
Out
cats
compete native species
Examples?
Changes in Space and Time
Spatial
Biomes -- climate determined
Temporal
Succession
Primary vs. secondary
Successional sere
Dominant plants
Grassland, deciduous forest
Pioneer to climax
Let’s do NC Piedmont together!!!
Johnston and Odum pdf
Changes in Space and Time
Climax
Examples
Self-perpetuating community?
Dynamic equilibrium?
Spruce-fir, oak-hickory, tall grass prairie
Longleaf pine (disequilibrium)
Long-lasting communities
Loss of chestnut
Frasier fir and eastern hemlock to follow?
Changes in Space and Time
Aquatic ecosystems
Oligotrophic
Geologically young, “few nutrients”
Eutrophic
A lot of nutrients
Succession is oligotrophic to eutrophic
Eutrophication
Sewage
Lake Erie
1960-70’s “dead”
Phosphorus from detergents
Algae blooms, high BOD (biological oxygen demand), anoxia
In 1970’s- 80’s controlled nutrient inputs and anoxia levels decreases
In 90’s anoxic zones, dead zones, began to increase again, why?
Stratified longer due to global warming, so more BOD below thermocline?
Succession & Wildlife Mgt
Early successional species
“r”
selected
Disturbance dependent environments
High reproductive potential
Short lived, rapid turnover
Good dispersers
Smaller size
Successional “threat”
Many, but not all, disturbancedependent species doing well
Succession & Wildlife Mgt
Late successional species
“K” selected
Stable communities
Good competitors
Long lived, slow turnover
Low reproductive potential
Poor disperses
Larger size
Climax species -- tendency to not do well
Diversity r/K Strategies
Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis
Too
little, K-strategists dominate
Too much, r-strategists dominate
Intermediate disturbance frequency yields
maximum species diversity
Succession & Wildlife Mgt
Disturbance communities are more
abundant than climax communities
Diversity and Stability
Species diversity
Abundance
S = Number of species = species richness
N = population size
Density = N/unit area = N/A
Latitudinal gradient in species diversity
Tropics - high S, low number of individuals per
species
Poles - vise versa
Diversity/Stability
How to measure diversity?
S = species richness
Shannon-Weaver Index (H’)
All kinds of diversity
Includes numbers of individuals per species
Evenness (equitability), equal number of individuals per
species
Higher S, higher H’
more evenness, higher H’
H’max = lnS
Genetic, individual, species, community, etc
Trying to resolve diversity into a single
number is problematic
Spe cie s
n
p
A
B
C
D
30
20
40
10
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
-1.204
-1.609
-0.916
-2.303
ln p
-0.361
-0.322
-0.367
-0.230
pl np
10 0
1
H'=
-1.280
Spe cie s
n
p
ln p
pl np
A
25
0.25
-1.386
-0.347
B
C
D
25
25
25
0.25
0.25
0.25
-1.386
-1.386
-1.386
-0.347
-0.347
-0.347
10 0
1
H'=
-1.386
H'=
S=
ln S = Hma x=
J=H'/Hma x
1.280
4
1.386
0.923
H'=
1.386
sp eci es
a
b
c
d
e
N
15
20
10
40
15
10 0
p
0.15
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.15
ln p
-1.8971 2
-1.6094 379
-2.3025 851
-0.9162 907
-1.8971 2
pl np
-0.2845 68
-0.3218 876
-0.2302 585
-0.3665 163
-0.2845 68
-1.4877 984
a
b
c
d
e
15 0
20 0
10 0
40 0
15 0
10 00
0.15
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.15
-1.8971 2
-1.6094 379
-2.3025 851
-0.9162 907
-1.8971 2
-0.2845 68
-0.3218 876
-0.2302 585
-0.3665 163
-0.2845 68
-1.4877 984
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
I
j
20
7
5
5
8
30
5
10
8
2
10 0
0.2
0.07
0.05
0.05
0.08
0.3
0.05
0.1
0.08
0.02
-1.6094 379
-2.6592 6
-2.9957 323
-2.9957 323
-2.5257 286
-1.2039 728
-2.9957 323
-2.3025 851
-2.5257 286
-3.9120 23
-0.3218 876
-0.1861 482
-0.1497 866
-0.1497 866
-0.2020 583
-0.3611 918
-0.1497 866
-0.2302 585
-0.2020 583
-0.0782 405
-2.0312 03
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
I
j
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
-2.3025 851
-2.3025 851
-2.3025 851
-2.3025 851
-2.3025 851
-2.3025 851
-2.3025 851
-2.3025 851
-2.3025 851
-2.3025 851
-0.2302 585
-0.2302 585
-0.2302 585
-0.2302 585
-0.2302 585
-0.2302 585
-0.2302 585
-0.2302 585
-0.2302 585
-0.2302 585
-2.3025 851
H'
5 species, unevenness
-1.4877 984
-1.4877 984
-2.0312 03
Same as above, but 10x more numbers
H’ is the same
10 species, unevenness; same
number of individuals as the
top example; H’ greater
Same as above but even; H’ greater
-2.3025 851
Diversity/Stability
Text definition of stability
Relative consistency in the abundance of populations
There is no such thing.
Text definition is overly simplistic
Diversity/Stability
Equilibrium stability
Resilience
Returns to original state after perturbation
No perturbation, no change
Short time to return to original state after perturbation
Rapid recoil
Tundra vs. pine woods
Resistance
How much perturbation is needed to effect change?
A little, unstable
A lot, stable
Diversity/Stability
Early ecologists
Greater
diversity = stability
Intuitive appeal, but data to support?
Diversity/Stability
Now
W/in ecosystem diversity and stability tend to be
positively correlated
Diversity is not a driver, but a consequence
It’s not a mechanism (interactions, processes)
What is the mechanism?
Interactions among species?
Weak, then more independent, and more stable
Strong, then more dependent, and less stable
Differential response of species or guilds (functional
groups) to varying conditions
Diversity/Stability
Symbiosis
General
term for the relationship between
dissimilar organisms
Specific types
Mutualism
-- both benefit
Lichens -- fungus and algae
Obligatory vs. facultative
Commensalism
-- one benefits, other not
harmed -- mussels?
Parasitism -- one benefits, other harmed
Diversity/Stability
Example of mutualism???
Calvaria forests on Mauritius and the
dodo
Calvaria
major (Dodo tree) (old scientific
name)
Tambalacoque
(Sideroxylon grandiflorum)
Diversity/Stability
Pollution tends to simplify communities
EPT
index
The abundance of macroinvertebrates in
streams
orders
Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera
(stoneflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies)
Sum of the number of Ephemeroptera,
Plecoptera, and Trichoptera divided by the total
number of midges (Diptera: Chironomidae)
Diversity/Stability
Monocultures
Maintaining biodiversity is a good thing
Agriculture
Forestry
“To keep every cog and wheel is the first
precaution of intelligent tinkering” Leopold
Society for Conservation Biology (SCB)
To advance the science and practice of conserving
the Earth's biological diversity.
Diversity/Stability Debate
Why important?
Great
Great
loss in species diversity
increase in invasive exotics
Implicit assumption that ecosystems
evolved the ability to withstand these
assaults
Will this destabilize ecosystems?