Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Modeling Marine Fisheries
Download
Report
Transcript Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Modeling Marine Fisheries
Spatial and Temporal Patterns
in Modeling Marine Fisheries
Heather Berkley
Outline
Chapter 1: Spatial and temporal patterns in a spatial
fisheries model with stochastic dispersal
Spatial & temporal patterns of model with and without fishing
How the spatial pattern of fishing impacts population dynamics
Find optimal harvest level for each harvest strategy
Chapter 2: Age-structured population model with spatial
and age-targeted harvest
Add age-structure to population model
Impose age/size-specific harvest
Determine optimal harvest strategy for age-structured model
Chapter 3: Multi-species fishery: spatial and temporal
patterns impacting coexistence & storage effect
Model 2 interacting species
Determine requirements for coexistence
Evaluate management strategies, including separate policies
Motivation for Research
Fisheries are in decline due to overfishing
Questions:
How to maintain sustainable levels of fish
How and where fish disperse
How different fishing policies impact the
populations
How spatial & temporal variability impacts
population dynamics
Use the answers to better inform fisheries
management
This Fisheries Model
Single species, near shore fishery
Linear coastline
Sessile adults
Dispersal only in larval stage
Homogeneous ocean with realistic ocean
velocity statistics
An integro-difference model describing
coastal fish population dynamics:
# of adults at x
in time t+1
# of adults
harvested
Natural mortality of
un-harvested adults
Axt 1 Axt H xt M (Axt H xt )
(A H ) Fx ' L K x x ' R
t
x'
t
x'
t
x
all x '
Fecundity
Larval survival
Larval dispersal
# of larvae that successfully recruit
to location x from everywhere
Fraction of
settlers that
recruit at x
Stochastic Dispersal
Physical oceanographers (Davis 1985, Poulain and Niiler
1989, Dever et al. 1998) say:
On average, flows become decorrelated
on a temporal scale of about 3 days
on a spatial scale of 10-50 km
So, larvae released in a region within a few days tend to
travel together
Annual recruitment may be a small sampling of a Gaussian
dispersal kernel
E.g. From 100 independent releases, 10% may make it back to shore
within competency window
This “spiky” recruitment better fits empirical larval settlement data
If there is larger spatial correlation in dispersal,
Groups of larvae are larger
“Packets” will be released from a region and settle together
Connections among sites are stochastic and intermittent
Basis for Packet Model
Number of packets released:
Tsp D
S
N
Tl r
Tsp = duration of spawning season
(days):
Tl = Lagrangian decorrelation time
scale (days):
D = size of the domain (km)
r = Rossby radius (km)
S = survival probability of packet
“Spiky” or “Packet” vs. Diffusive Dispersal
In “spiky” model, single
locations serve as
sources & destinations
In “packet” model,
many adjacent
locations serve as
sources & settlement
locations
Spatial & Temporal Patterns
Packet model has spatial autocorrelation the size of
the settlement “packet”
Positive temporal autocorrelation for long-lived adults
for 3-4 years
(B)
Fishing policies
1. Constant Effort
Same fraction of adults is harvested (H) at all locations
2. Constant TAC
TAC set for the whole region: (H) (virgin K) (size of
domain)
effort concentrated on locations with most fish
3. Constant Escapement
Escapement level same for each location: (1 - H)
(virgin K)
4. Constant Local Harvest
TAC set for the whole region, divided equally among
all locations
Pattern of Spatial Variance
For all 4 harvest policies:
Variance in Recruitment increases with harvest
due to decrease in post-settlement density
dependence
Combination of variance in Recruitment and
Escapement determines variance in Adults
Spatial pattern of harvest determines how
variance in escapement changes with
increased fishing pressure
Future steps
Determine optimal harvest level for each policy
Plot mean harvest vs. harvest fraction and take
maximum
Investigate the impact of different types of
density dependence
Post-settlement recruitment due to adult density
Post-settlement recruitment due to larval density
Reduced adult survival due to adult density
Reduced adult fecundity due to adult density
Chapter 2. Age-Structured Model
Demographic characteristics are not constant
throughout life
Especially important in fisheries b/c older
females can produce many more larvae than
younger, smaller females
Age-Structured model allows different ages to
have different demographic parameters
Often used when evaluating marine reserves,
but also applicable to evaluating other types of
management
Age-Structured Rockfish model
Sebastes jordani, shortbelly rockfish
M=0.2 - 0.35 yr -1
Fecundity increases with age & weight
Abundant but not heavily fished on
California coast
Growth
W W 1 e
K T t0
W asymptotic weight (g)
K = instantaneous growth
coefficient
T = age (yr)
t0 = x-intercept
W 248.11 e
K 0.285 T 1.48
Weight (g)
Von Bertalanffy growth
Age (yr)
2.98
(Ralston et al 2003)
Fecundity
logF log logW
logF 3.8155 1.1416 logW
(Ralston et al 2003)
Size-Specific Harvest
Use age and size relationships to assign a
length to fish
Allow harvest of specific sizes:
Minimum size limit
Maximum size limit
Slot limit
Harvest will change age-structure of population,
which will impact the future productivity of the
population
Size-Specific Harvest
Determine optimal size limits for different
size-specific management
Compare to 4 non size-related
management and marine reserves
Evaluate the value of using an agestructured model vs. more simple model
Ch 3. Multi-Species Fisheries
Many species of fish and invertebrates in
nearshore communities are fished
Interactions through a shared resource can
impact the population dynamics of other species
Changing the abundance through fishing alters
the intensity of the interactions between species
It is important to study how these interactions
are influenced by stochastic dispersal
Temporal Variability
Temporal variability in settlement and
recruitment propagates up through age classes
Long-lived adults buffer the population against
drastic decline when recruitment does not occur
consistently
Inter & intraspecifc competition decreases
recruitment of all species
Temporal changes in settlement alters the
intensity of competition
Eg. good environmental conditions promote settlement,
which increases the competition between larvae
This is called “covariance between environment and
competition”
Storage Effect
Species at high density experiences more
intraspecific competition
Species at lower density experiences mostly
interspecific competition, but its density is low
Higher growth rate
Allows for coexistence
Storage Effect occurs when long-lived adults
buffer against too much variation and difference
in population sizes and gives a growth rate
advantage for the species at lower density
Spatial Variability
Species have different preferences to environmental
conditions
Overtime, population size will increase in the most
favorable locations
Spatial pattern of habitat suitability generates differences
in the strength of competition between species of
different densities
Species at low density experiences less interspecific
competition in good habitat locations because the other
species is more likely to be somewhere else
Higher growth rate
Allows for coexistence
Spatial Storage Effect
Covariance between environmental conditions
and competition is stronger for the species at
higher density
Difference in between the covariances
establishes the “spatial storage effect” and
facilitates coexistence
Short-distance dispersal increases the
covariance because it causes populations to
build up in nearby locations
Multi-Species Model
2 species with similar life-histories
Test the impact of temporal & spatial variability
on coexistence by changing:
Duration of spawning
Dispersal distance
Evaluate the impact of different spatial patterns
of harvest on both fisheries
With same type of management
With different types of management
Marine Reserves