Transcript Notes

Competition
Chapter 13
1
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Modes of Competition
• Interference:
–
• Intraspecific:
–
• Interspecific:
–
2
Bart’s hay field…
http://www.gardenseeker.com/herbs/images/alfalfa_sprouted.jpg
3
Intraspecific Competition Among
Herbaceous Plants
• Plants compete for…
• Competition is more intense at …
• Self-Thinning (-3/2 or -1/2 slope rule)
¿How does this explain influence spacing in
plants?
4
5
Niches
• Niche: Summarizes environmental factors that
influence growth, survival, and reproduction
of a species.
• Gause: Principle of Competitive Exclusion
– Two species with identical niches cannot coexist
indefinitely.
• One will be a better competitor and thus have higher
fitness and eventually exclude the other.
6
Niches
• Hutchinson defined niche as:
– n-dimensional hyper-volume
• n equates the number of environmental factors
important to survival and reproduction of a species.
– Fundamental niche - hypervolume
– Realized niche includes interactions such as
competition that may restrict environments where
a species may live.
7
Feeding Niches of Galapagos Finches
8
Feeding Niches of Galapagos Finches
– Grant found differences in beak size among
ground finches translates directly into diet.
• Size of seeds eaten can be estimated by measuring
beak depths.
– Individuals with deepest beaks fed on hardest seeds.
• After 1977 drought, the remaining seeds were very
hard. Thus, mortality was most heavy in birds with
smaller beaks.
9
Mathematical and Laboratory Models
• Metz summarized models:
– Abstractions and simplifications, not facsimiles of
nature.
– Man-made construct; partly empirical and partly
deductive.
– Used to provide insights into natural phenomena.
10
Lotka Volterra
• In general, LV predicts coexistence of two
species when, for both species, interspecific
competition is weaker than intraspecific
competition.
11
Paramecia Lab Experiments
What happened
when grown
together?
12
Paramecia Lab Experiments
• Gause demonstrated resource limitation with
Paramecium caudatum and Paramecium
aurelia in presence of two different
concentrations of Bacillus pyocyaneus.
– When grown alone, carrying capacity determined
by intraspecific competition.
– When grown together, P. caudatum quickly
declined.
• Reduced resource supplies increased competition.
13
Competition and Niches
• Competition can restrict species to their
realized niches.
– But if competitive interactions are strong and
pervasive enough, they may produce an
evolutionary response in the competitor
population.
• Changes fundamental niche.
14
Niches and Competition Among Plants
• Tansley suggested interspecific competition
restricts realized niche of each of two species
of bedstraw (Galium spp.) to a narrower range
of soil types.
• Can you think of other variables/resources
that could be partitioned?
15
16
17
18
Competition and Niches of Small
Rodents
19
Competition and Niches of Small
Rodents
• Brown studied competition among rodents in
Chihuahuan Desert.
– Predicted if competition among rodents is mainly
for food, then small granivorous rodent
populations would increase in response to
removal of larger granivorous rodents.
• Insectivorous rodents would show little or no response.
• Results supported hypothesis.
20
Character Displacement
• Because degree of competition is assumed to
depend upon degree of niche overlap,
interspecific competition has been predicted
to lead to directional selection for reduced
niche overlap.
21
Character Displacement
22
Character Displacement
• Taper and Case: Necessary criteria:
– Morphological differences between sympatric
species are statistically greater than differences
between allopatric populations.
– Differences between sympatric and allopatric
populations have genetic basis.
– Differences between sympatric and allopatric
populations evolved in place, and are not derived
from different founder groups already differing in
the character.
23
Taper and Case: Characteristics
– Variation in the character must have a known
effect on use of resources.
– Must be demonstrated competition for the
resource and competition must be directly
correlated with character similarity.
– Differences in character cannot be explained by
differences in resources available to each of the
populations.
24
25