Transcript Slide 1

Geoelectricity
Introduction: Electrical Principles
Let Q1, Q2 be electrical charges separated by a distance r. There is a
force between the two charges that goes like
FK
Q1Q2
r2
This is called Coulomb’s law, after Charles
Augustin de Coulomb who first figured this
out.
Charles Augustin de Coulomb
(1736 - 1806)
Later, Ampere figured out what the units should be based on the
flow of charge though parallel wires. We define a material property
eo called the permittivity constant:
F
1 Q1Q2
4eo r 2
which is approximately equal to

8.85419
x 10-12 C2N-1m-2 (C = Coulomb
which is a unit of charge. One
Coulomb is defined as the amount of
charge that passes through a wire of 1
Ampere current flowing for 1 second).
ANDRÉ-MARIE AMPÈRE
( 1775 - 1836 )
Note similarity to force of gravity. There are many analogues. We
can define the electric field (similar to gravity acceleration field) as a
force per unit charge:
F
Q2
E

Q1 4e o r 2
units of E in this form are N Q-1. We think of a field as lines along
which a charge Q1 would move if were attracted by the charge Q2.
Also analogous to gravity, we define an electrical potential U and
relate it to the field by a negative gradient:
U
E 
r
And we define U as the work per unit charge required to bring an
object from infinity to r:
r
U    Edr  

r
Q
 4e r

o
2
dr 
Q
4eo r
Instead of absolute potentials we
normally talk
 about potential differences
which we call volts (V; after the Italian
physicist Alessandro Volta). There is a
famous relation between the voltage,
current, and resistance in a wire called
Ohm’s Law:
V  IR
Georg Simon Ohm
1787-1854
However, resistance is not really an intensive material property (like,
say, density) and so is not appropriate for application to rocks. We
define instead the resistivity r as:
The unit of r are Ohm-meters or W-m:
We then write the 3D equivalent of Ohm’s law as
V
I
 r  E  rJ
L
A
where we recognize E as the potential gradient (V/L) and J = I/A is
called the current density. Note that we also define the conductivity
s as 1/r.
Units:
R
I
V
r
s
E
Ohms
Amperes or Amps
Volts
Ohm-meters
mhos/meter or siemens/meter
Volts/meter
Electrical Conduction
1. Electronic or Ohmic: free electrons.
A property of metals. Very efficient.
Ranges over ~24 orders of magnitude
Conductors
r < 1 Ohm-meter
Resistors/Insulators
r > 1 Ohm-meter
Semi-conductors r ~ 1 Ohm-meter; electrons only partially bound
Good conductors:
Ok conductors:
Semiconductors:
Insulators:
metals, graphite
sulphides, arsenides
most oxides
carbonates, phosphates, nitrates (most rocks)
2. Ionic or Electrolytic:
Dissolved Ions in a fluid (water).
Very efficient but more space problems with bigger elements moving
around. Thus it is not as efficient as electronic
Water is very important in this process, which makes electrical
methods very good for addressing water related problems.
We use the empirical Archie’s Law for a porous medium:
r
a
rw
m n
 S
where  is the porosity, S is the fraction of pores filled with water, rw
is the resistivity of the water, and m, n, and a are material constants.

Generally 0.5 < a < 2.5, 1.3 < m < 2.5, and n ~ 2. Often we just
assume “2” for all of them.
rw examples:
Meteoric Rain
Fresh Water (Seds)
Sea Water (Ocean)
30-1000 Wm
1-100 Wm
0.2 Wm
Material
Resistivity (Ohm-meter)
Air
Infinite
Pyrite
3 x 10-1
Galena
2 x 10-3
Quartz
4 x 1010 - 2 x 1014
Calcite
1 x 1012 - 1 x 1013
Rock Salt
30 - 1 x 1013
Mica
9 x 1012 - 1 x 1014
Granite
100 - 1 x 106
Gabbro
1 x 103 - 1 x 106
Basalt
10 - 1 x 107
Limestones
50 - 1 x 107
Sandstones
1 - 1 x 108
Shales
20 - 2 x 103
Dolomite
100 - 10,000
Sand
1 - 1,000
Clay
1 - 100
Ground Water 0.5 - 300
Sea Water
0.2
3. Dielectric: Caused by the relative displacement of protons and
electrons within their orbital shells. Of no importance at low f (to DC)
but is very important at high frequency AC. The net effect is to
change the permittivity eo to e as:
e  eo
where  is the dielectric constant. Note that  generally is a function of
frequency;  (f) ~ 1/f. Here are some typical values of :

Water
Sandstone
Soil
Basalt
Gneiss
80
5-12
4-30
12
8.5
Note that in EM we define a Displacement field D as
D = eE
Maxwell’s Equations
B
 E  
t
D
 H  J 
t
Where J = sE, B = mH, and D = eE (and all are vectors). So in
general the electric and magnetic fields are coupled. However, in the
case of an isotropic, homogeneous medium they separate as:
E
2E
 E  ms
 em 2
t
t
2

H

H
 2 H  ms
 em 2
t
t
Note these are the same equation with different variables, and that
they are a combination of the diffusion and wave equations. We’ll
solve these in a bit when we talk about MT.
2
Electrical Methods
There is an alphabet soup of electrical methods (SP, IP, MT, EM,
Resistivity, GPR) which we will discuss in turn.
Most are sensitive to resistivity/conductivity in some way, except for
GPR (dielectric constant).
As we saw before, natural materials vary in resistivity by several
orders of magnitude.
Self Potential (SP)
Measure natural potential differences in the earth
Sources:
Electrokinetic or streaming potentials: moving ions.
Electrochemical (Nernst and diffusion)
diffusion: ions with different mobilities get separated
Nernst -> same electrodes, different concentrations
Mineralization -> different electrodes (materials)
Ore bodies always give negative potentials.
Measurement with porous pots.
Signals range from few mv to 1 V. 200 mV is a strong signal.
Self Potential Across a Fault
Mise a la Mase
Monitoring Fluid Flow
The Earth’s electric field.
The ground generally has negative charge, so the Earth’s E field
points down into the earth.
The atmosphere is generally positive, with ions produced by cosmic
rays. These bombard the Earth, which neutralize the surface.
However, the negative charge is replenished by lightning storms.
Tellurics
Natural electric currents in the
earth. These are cause by
decaying magnetic fields in the
earth. They are like large swirls
that follow the sun.
Electromagnetic fields arise from time-varying currents in the
ionosphere and tropical storms (lightning strikes).
Fields propagate as plane-waves vertically into the Earth,
inducing secondary currents.
We measure a voltage
difference, and figure that
current density results in from a
constriction or redirection of
current.
J
E
r

V
rL
Note you can measure in
perpendicular directions to get
the areal direction of current
and identify a resisitive body.
Magnetotellurics
Simultaneous measurement of the magnetic and electric fields in the
Earth. Let’s solve Maxwell’s equation for the H field (it will be the
same for the E field):
2

H

H
 2 H  ms
 em 2
t
t
Let’s assume a monochromatic field:
H(x,t) = H(x)eiwt
Note this is like the separation of variables trick we did for heat
conduction
 2 H  iwmsH  emw 2 H
The first term is called the conduction term, the second the displacement
term
The relative sizes of these terms (conductive to displacement) is s/ew.
So, if conductivity is large and/or frequencies are small, then the first
term dominates. If conductivity is small and/or frequencies are large,
the displacement term is large.
For rocks and natural field frequencies, the conductive term is about 8
orders of magnitude greater than the displacement term, so for this
kind of observation we have
 2 H  iwmsH
Which is the heat conductivity diffusion equation we solved before.
We take the exact same steps and find
H  H o e az ei wt az 
where
 wms 
a

 2 
1/ 2
Note that for normal values of m in the Earth, the attenuation term
becomes
e az
  wms 1/ 2 

f 
3
 exp 
 z   exp 2 10 z

r
  2  

z is in meters, ris in Wm, and f is in Hz. The skin depth zs is when the
field is Ho/e:
z s  500
Examples
r 10-4 Wm
r
f
102 Wm
f
10-2
50 m
5 x 104 m
103
0.16 m
160 m
Now, as an H field penetrates the surface it will attenuate. Maxwell
says that:
D
 H  J 
t
Again, the dielectric term will be much smaller than the conductive
term, so
  H  J  sE
Assuming a simple H that is oriented in the y direction (Hy component),
we evaluate:
i

 H 
x
0
j

y
Hy
k
H y
H y
H y

 i
k
 i
 J x  sE x
z
z
x
z
0
From before
H y

 az iwt  az
iwt 
Jx  
  H oe e
  H oe
e az (1i )
z
z
z
 Hoeiwt a(1  i)eaz (1i )  a(1  i) H
J x  2aHei / 4  mws  Hei / 4
1/ 2
Thus, the current (telluric) has a /4 phase shift relative to the initial
H field.
If mws is small, then H penetrates to great depth, and little J is
produced.
If mws is large,then H does not go to great depth, and big J is
produced.
The idea behind MT is to measure H and E simultaneously, and take
the ratio of E in one direction to H in the perpendicular direction.
From above
1/ 2
1/ 2

mws 
 mw 
i / 4
i / 4
Ex 
H ye

 H ye
s
 s 
so
1/ 2
Ey


Ex
mw
   
H y  s 
Hx
We can make a “pseudo-section” of resistivity as follows:

1 Hy
1 Hy
Ex  

s z
s eff zeff
so
zeff
1/ 2
1 Hy
1 s eff 
1 mw 
1 Ex
T Ex






  


s eff 
E x s eff mw 
mw s eff 
mw H y 2m H y
1/ 2
where T is the period and w = 2/T.
Thus
Hy
1 Hy
T Ex
 reff

s eff E x
E x 2m H y
or
r eff 

T Ex
2m H y
2
Assuming a typical value for m of 1.3 x 10-6 henrys/meter we can write:

r eff
Ex
 0.2T
Hy
2
1
zeff 
5rT
2

where the units are
E
H
T
r
z
mV/km
gammas
seconds
Wm
km
So the idea is to determine r as a function of frequency (for different
E/H ratios) and then calculate the corresponding depth z.
MT Recording Geometry
MT Resistivity in subducting
plate
MT Cross section across a fault
Resistivity
An active technique. Pump current into the ground and measure
spatial variation in voltage to get a resistivity map.
Let’s consider what happens if we put an electrode into the ground,
and start with an infinite space. We can think of it as a charge Q with
associated electric fields and potentials.
Everywhere around Q, as long as there are no sources or sinks (i.e. no
other charges in the volume) then the potential U satisfies Laplace’s
equation (in spherical coordinates):
2 U
U 2 
0
dr
r dr
2
 2U
Note that
2


U 2 U 
2
 2r
 r  2 
r
 r

2
dr  dr 
dr
dr
r dr 
dr
  2 U 
2

U
2
U
so Laplace’s equation is equvalent in this case to

  2 U 
r
 0
dr  dr 
or
U
A
 2
dr r


A
U 
r
Note that integrative constants are zero because U and gradU -> 0 as r
-> infinity.
The current at any radius r is related to the current density by
U
A
2
I  4r J  4r s
 4r s 2  4sA
r
r
2
2
Thus
A

and


I
4s
Ir
U
4r
4rU
r
I
If the electrode is at the surface of a half space instead of within an
infinite space, then we repeat the above but use a hemisphere instead
of a sphere and find
Ir
U
2r


2rU
r
I
Now suppose we have two electrodes at the surface at points A and
B, and we want to determine the potential at an arbitrary point C.
If the distances to C are rAC and rBC, then
U AC 
Ir
2rAC
U BC  
Ir
2rBC

we reverse the sign on UBC because
current flows of electrode one (positive
Q)
and into electrode two (negative Q).
The total potential at point C is then
UC  UAC  UBC
Ir
Ir
Ir  1
1 



 

2rAC 2rBC 2 rAC rBC 
Similarly, the potential at another point D would be
Ir  1
1 
UD 
 

2 rAD rDB 
And so the potential difference
between points C and D is VCD
 given by
VCD
or

Ir  1
1   1
1 
 UC  U D 
    

2 rAC rCB  rAD rDB 




2VCD 
1

r
I  1
1   1
1 

    
rAC rCB  rAD rDB 




2VCD 
1

r
I  1
1   1
1 

    
rAC rCB  rAD rDB 
This is the fundamental resistivity
equation. It is independent of any
particular geometry, but there are
some configurations which are
more or less standard.
Wenner: equal spacing between current and potential electrodes:
2VCD
r
I



 2V
1
CD


I
 1  1    1  1  
  a 2a   2a a  



 2aV
1
CD


I
 1     1  
  2a   2a  
Schlumberger: Current electrodes are a distance 2L apart, potential
electrodes are a distance 2l apart, the center of the potential electrodes
is a distance x from the center of the current electrodes, and L >> l and
L-x >> l (we are far from the ends). In this case
rBC  L  x  l
rAC  L  x  l
rAD  L  x  l
rBD  L  x  l



2VCD 
1


r
  1
1
1 
I  1



 


L  x  l L  x  l  L  x  l L  x  l 

If L-x >> l and L+x >> l, then
1



1
l
l   1
l
1
1

 L  x  1

  L  x  1
 
2 

 L  x 
 L  x  L  x L  x  
Lxl
and similarly for the other terms (substitute –l for l and –x for x).
Plug all this in and eventually you get
 L2  x 2 2 

VCD 

r
2Il  L2  x 2 


Dipole-Dipole
In this case we imagine that both the current and potential electrodes
are separated by a distance 2l and the distance between the inner
current and potential electrodes is a multiple of this distance = 2l(n-1)
where n >= 1 (when n = 1, they are together).
In this case:
rAC  2l (n 1)  2l  2ln
rBC  2l(n 1)
rAD  2l(n 1)  2l  2l  2l(n  1)
rBD  2l (n 1)  2l  2ln





 2V ln n 2 1
2VCD 
1
CD
 
r
1   1
1 
I  1
I




 


2ln 2l(n 1)  2l(n  1) 2ln 


Making a resistivity pseudo section:
Measure r at a given separation, mark a spot half way in between
(d=l(n-1)) and plot this a a depth the same distance below the
surface (i.e., depth = l(n-1).
Resistivity Imaging around a Tunnel
Resistivity Imaging in Limestone (Karst Lithology)
Current Distribution
Where is the current going, anyway? We can get an idea by examining
the case of a homogeneous halfspace.
Consider current electrodes a distance L apart. At a point P a distance r1
from the positive electrode and r2 from the negative electrode (and at a
depth z):
U
 Ir 1 1 
Ex  
     
x
x 2 r1 r2 
we set
r1  x 2  y 2  z 2
r2 
L  x   y 2  z 2
2

1/ 2
3 / 2
  1   2
2x
   x  y 2  z 2    x 2  y 2  z 2 
x  r1  x
2

 x x  y  z
2

2

2 3 / 2
 1 
  
L  x 2  y 2  z 2
x  r2  x

L  x

3
1
r
x
 3
r1

1/ 2
 2L  x 
L  x 2  y 2  z 2

2


3 / 2
Hence
I  x L  x
Jx  sE x 
 3 

3
2 r1
r2 
For illustration, let’s see what happens at the midpoint between the
electrodes. x = L/2, L-x = L/2, so

r1  r2 
I
Jx 
2
L / 22  y 2  z 2

L/2


2
2
2



L
/
2

y

z


IL
1

2 L / 22  y 2  z 2



3/ 2
3/ 2




2
2
2 3/ 2
L / 2  y  z 

L/2

The current that flows across and element dydz is dIx = Jxdydz. Thus,
the fraction of the total current I that flows between the surface and
depth z is
z

Ix
L
dy

dz 

I 2 0  L / 22  y 2  z 2 3 / 2


z
Ix L
dz
2
1 2 z
 
 tan
2
2
I  0 L / 2   z

L
This shows that half the current crosses above a depth z = L/2, and
almost 90% above z = 3L.
This gives you some idea on how current distribution depends on
separation of electrodes.
How about layers of resisitivity? It gets complicated fast.
Let’s first consider two halfspaces separated by in interface. The
upper halfspace has a resistivity r1 and the lower halfspace has
resistivity r2. We have a current electrode in the upper halfspace.
What is the potential at a point P in the upper halfspace and P’ in the
lower halfspace?
We define a “reflection coefficient” k and a transmission coefficient
1-k. If the point P is a distance r1 from C, then
Ir1 1 k 
VP 
  
4 r1 r2 
where r2 is the “ray” distance to the interface and back to P from C,
following the usual
reflection law (equal angles of incidence and
reflection). Note that r2 can be constructed by reflecting the normal
from C across the interface and drawing a straight line to P.
Similarly, the potential at P’ is
Ir2 1 k 
VP' 


4   r3 
where r3 is the distance from C to P’.
If we move the points P and P’ to the interface, (P=P’) then r1 = r2 =
r3 and
Ir1 1
 
4 r1
from which
k  Ir2 1 k 



r1  4  r1 
r2  r1
k
r2  r1

Note that –1 < k < 1.

How about a layer over a half space?
As in the case of the two halfspaces, we account for the bottom interface
by summing potentials from the original electode (C1) and it’s mirror
across the interface (C2). BUT now we have to mirror C2 across the
other interface (surface) to produce C3, and mirror C3 across the lower
interface to get C4 and so on ad infinitum. Hence:
Ir1 1 
VC1 
 
4  r 
Ir1 k 
VC 2 
 
4 r1 

Ir1 k  ka 
VC 3 
  
4   r1 
Ir1 k  ka  k 
VC 4 


4  r2

Ir1 k  ka  k  ka 
VC 5 


4 
r2

and so on, where the reflection at the surface depends on the
resistivity of the air (ra) or
r  r1
ka  a
1
r a  r1
Because the resitivity of the air is very large.
Ir1 1 2k 2k 2
 VCi  2 r  r  r 

1
2
i1


r1  r  2h 
hence
2

2 1/ 2




; rm  r  2mh 
2




m
Ir1 1
k

V
 2
2 
2
2 r
m1 r  2m h



2 1/ 2
Induced Polarization
Induced Polarization (IP) is the transient storage of voltage in the
ground. We can produce it by turning the voltage in a resistivity array
on and off.
The origin of induced electrical polarization is complex and is not well
understood. This is primarily because several physio-chemical
phenomena and conditions are likely responsible for its occurrence.
When a metal electrode is immersed in a solution of ions of a certain
concentration and valence, a potential difference is established
between the metal and the solution sides of the interface.
This difference in potential is an explicit function of the ion
concentration, valence, etc.
When an external voltage is applied across the interface, a current is
caused to flow, and the potential drop across the interface changes
from its initial value.
The change in interface voltage is called the "overvoltage" or
"polarization" potential of the electrode. Overvoltages are due to an
accumulation of ions on the electrolyte side of the interface waiting
to be discharged. The time constant of buildup and decay is typically
several tenths of a second.
Overvoltage is therefore established whenever current is caused to
flow across an interface between ionic and electronic conduction. In
normal rocks, the current that flows under the action of an applied
EMF does so by ionic conduction in the electrolyte in the pores of the
rock. There are, however, certain minerals that have a measure of
electronic conduction (almost all the metallic sulfides - except
sphalerite - such as pyrite, graphite, some coals, magnetite, pyrolusite,
native metals, some arsenides, and other minerals with a metallic
lustre).
The most important sources of nonmetallic IP in rocks are certain
types of clay minerals (Vacquier 1957, Seigel 1970). These effects
are believed to be related to electrodialysis of the clay particles. This
is only one type of phenomenon that can cause "ion-sorting" or
"membrane effects." For example, the figure below shows a cationselective membrane zone in which the mobility of the cation is
increased relative to that of the anion, causing ionic concentration
gradients and therefore polarization.
In time-domain IP, several indices have been used to define the
polarizability of the medium. Seigel (1959) defined "chargeability"
(in seconds) as the ratio of the area under the decay curve (in
millivolt-seconds, mV-s) to the potential difference (in mV) measured
before switching the current off. Komarov, et al., (1966) defined
"polarizability" as the ratio of the potential difference after a given
time from switching the current off to the potential difference before
switching the current off. Polarizability is expressed as a percentage.
Chargeabilty M
Frequency Effect
1
M
Vo
t2
 V(t)dt
t1
r f  rF
FE 
rF

Metal Factor

MF  As F  s f  A rF  r f

A = 2 x 105
1
1
r  r 
f
F
 A
 r r 

 f F 

IP Example - Mapping soil and groundwater contamination.
Cahyna, Mazac, and Vendhodova (1990) used IP to determine the slag-type material
containing cyanide complexes that have contaminated groundwater in
Czechoslovakia. The figure shows contours of ηa (percent) obtained from a 10-m grid of
profiles. The largest IP anomaly (ηa = 2.44%) directly adjoined the area of the outcrop
of the contaminant (labeled A). The hatched region exhibits polarizability over 1.5% and
probably represents the maximum concentration of the contaminant. The region
exhibiting polarizability of less than 0.75% was interpreted as ground free of any slagtype contaminant.
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) uses a high-frequency (80 to 1,500
MHz) EM pulse transmitted from a radar antenna to probe the
earth. The transmitted radar pulses are reflected from various
interfaces within the ground, and this return is detected by the radar
receiver.
Remember from Maxwell:
2

E

E
 2 E  ms
 em 2
t
t
At high frequencies, the second (wave) term dominates, so
2 E
 E  em 2
t
2
This is just like seismic waves, only in this case the reflection
coefficient and wavespeed depend on dielectric constant.
Reflecting interfaces may be soil horizons, the groundwater surface,
soil/rock interfaces, man-made objects, or any other interface
possessing a contrast in dielectric properties. The dielectric
properties of materials correlate with many of the mechanical and
geologic parameters of materials.
How it works:
The radar signal is imparted to the ground by an antenna that is in
close proximity to the ground. The reflected signals can be detected
by the transmitting antenna or by a second, separate receiving
antenna.
As the antenna (or antenna pair) is moved along the surface, the
graphic recorder displays results in a cross-section record or radar
image of the earth.
Spatial considerations:
As GPR has short wavelengths in most earth materials, resolution of
interfaces and discrete objects is very good. However, the
attenuation of the signals in earth materials is high, and depths of
penetration seldom exceed 10 m. Water and clay soils increase the
attenuation, decreasing penetration.
The objective of GPR surveys is to map near-surface interfaces. For
many surveys, the location of objects such as tanks or pipes in the
subsurface is the objective. Dielectric properties of materials are not
measured directly. The method is most useful for detecting changes
in the geometry of subsurface interfaces.
Signal GPR waveform
Unlike seismic waves,
most of the GPR signal is
perpendicular to the
antenna (straight down)
Typical Example of
a GPR field trace.
GPR on a small scale.
Using GPR to locate graves,
trenches, and sinkholes
Electromagnetic Induction
The way this works is you create your own magnetic field by passing
current through a wire, usually a current loop. The magnetic field
penetrates the ground, produces a current that induces a secondary
field in an object in the ground. The receiving loop detects a
combination of the original signal field and that produced by an
object in the ground.
Electromagnetic Induction: Quantitative Bits
We start by generating our own magnetic field B. Use the
diffusion part of Maxwell’s equation:
B
 B  ms
t
2
Recall from the MT discussion

H  H o e az ei wt az 
where
 wms 
a

 2 
1/ 2
Some definitions:
IC
IR
IT
R
L
VC
current in conductor
current in receiver
current in transmitter
resistance of conductor
inductance of conductor
voltage of conductor
Inductance produces a voltage proportional to the rate of change of
current. Thus:
dI
VC  I C R  L C  I C ( R  iwL)
dt
The current in one entity produces a voltage in another through
Mutual inductance. Let
MTC
MTR
MCR
Mutual inductance between transmitter and conductor
Mutual inductance between transmitter and receiver
Mutual inductance between conductor and receiver
VC   M TC
dI T
 iwM TC I T
dt
Primary voltage in the receiver (due to the transmitter)
dIT
VP   M TR
 iwM TR I T
dt
Secondary voltage in the receiver (due to the conductor)
dIC
VS   M CR
 iwM CR I C
dt
From above
VC   M TC
So
dI T
 iwM TC IT  I C ( R  iwL)
dt
IC
 iwM TC
 iwM TC

 2
( R  iwL)
2 2
IT ( R  iwL) ( R  w L )
The secondary and primary voltages at the receiver are therefore
related as
VS  iwM CR I C M CR I C M CR  iwM TC ( R  iwL)



VP  iwM TR IT M TR IT M TR
( R 2  w 2 L2 )


M TC M CR  iwR  w 2 L2

M TR
( R 2  w 2 L2 )
Where
VS
M TC M CR

VP
M TR
R 2  wL w 2 L2 
 i

 2 
L  R
R 
M TC M CR  2  i

2
2 2
M
L
1




w
L
TR
R 2 1  2 
R 


wL
R
 is called the response parameter.
The real part of the quotient is called the in phase component, the
imaginary part is out of phase and is called the quadrature component.
VS
M TC M CR  2  i
M TC M CR 
i







i

Ae
VP
M TR L 1   2
M TR L 1   2
1
1  R 
  tan    tan  
 wL 
 
1
By observing both the amplitude and phase of the recorded EM
field, we can estimate R and L.
A variety of EM examples