Transcript Global Aviation Safety Roadmap

Performance aspects of the
Global Aviation Safety Plan
Paul Lamy
Chief, Flight safety Section
ICAO
1
Plan of the presentation
1. ICAO safety target and high-level safety
indicators
2. The Global Aviation Safety Plan and the
Global Aviation Safety Roadmap
3. Conclusions
2
The ICAO safety target
 Reduce the number of fatal accidents and
fatalities worldwide irrespective of the
volumes of air traffic;
 Achieve a significant decrease in accident
rates, particularly in regions where these
remain high; and
 No single ICAO Region shall have an
accident rate* more than twice the
worldwide rate by the end of 2010
* Based on a five year sliding average
3
Number of Fatal Accidents
(Commercial OPS & MTOM > 2 500kg)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
06
20
05
20
04
20
03
20
02
20
01
20
00
20
99
19
98
19
97
19
96
19
95
19
94
19
93
19
92
19
91
19
19
90
0
4
Number of Fatalities
(Commercial OPS & MTOM > 2 500kg)
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
06
20
05
20
04
20
03
20
02
20
01
20
00
20
99
19
98
19
97
19
96
19
95
19
94
19
93
19
92
19
91
19
19
90
0
Fatal accident rate
Accident rate per 10 million departures
Fatal accident rate in scheduled operations
25
20
15
Actual
Trend
10
5
0
6
Accident rate by Region
0.5
World
0.9
1.2
Latin America & Carribean
2.0
0.1
North America
0.4
2002-2006
0.6
Asia Pacific
2.3
1997-2001
1.9
Middle East
1.0
4.6
Africa
2.0
0.3
Europe
0.6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Accidents per million departures
4.0
4.5
5.0
High-Level Indicators

Used by Council to determine overall progress
towards the Strategic Objectives of the
Organization.

3 high-level indicators for safety
1.
Fatal accident rate in scheduled operations
2.
Global safety reporting culture
3.
Level of Safety Oversight (pending)
8
HLI: Fatal accident rate
Fatal accident rate in scheduled operations
Accident rate per 10 million departures
25
20
15
Actual
Trend
10
5
0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
9
High-Level Safety Indicators
Global safety reporting culture
(Percentage of Open Files in ADREP)
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
0%
10
HLI: Level of safety oversight

Level of Safety Oversight


Based on the level of implementation of the eight
critical elements of safety oversight (ICAO audits)
For implementation in 2008/2009 when sufficient
data are available
11
Global Aviation Safety Plan
 A major overhaul of the plan is in progress
 The “new” GASP will be presented to the
Council in June and the Assembly in
September
 Will be based on the Global Aviation Safety
Roadmap developed by the Industry and
ICAO
12
Global Aviation Safety Roadmap
Background:
Inspired by 7th ICAO ANC Industry meeting in
May 2005
Modeled after a similar effort in the ATM field (Air
Navigation Roadmap and Global Air Navigation
Plan)
Produced by the Industry Safety Strategy Group
(ISSG) and ICAO:
Airbus, Airports Council International, Boeing,
Council of Air Navigation Service Organizations,
Flight Safety Foundation, International Air
Transport Association and International
Federation of Airline Pilot Associations
13
Global Aviation Safety Roadmap
Goals and Objectives:
Provide a common frame of
reference for all stakeholders
Coordinate and guide safety
policies and initiatives worldwide to
reduce the accident risk for
commercial aviation
Avoid duplication of effort and
uncoordinated strategies
Encourage close industry and
government cooperation on
common safety objectives
14
Global Aviation Safety Roadmap: Part 1
• Contents
− Describes rationale and a general approach based on
metrics and risk measurement.
− Defines 12 focus areas - Objectives are described for each
focus area for near and mid-term accomplishment.
− Focuses on aviation safety enablers in developing regions.
• Endorsement
− Signed by industry CEOs, December 2005.
− Endorsed by the Directors General at the 2006 ICAO Global
Strategy for Aviation Safety Conference, 20 to 22 March
2006.
15
Global Aviation Safety Roadmap
16
Global Roadmap’s 12 Focus Areas
Focus Areas
 States




Consistent implementation of int’l. standards
Consistent regulatory oversight
No impediments to reporting errors / incidents
Effective incident and accident investigation
 Regions
 Consistent coordination of regional programmes
 Industry







No impediments to reporting and analyzing errors / incidents
Consistent use of Safety Management Systems
Consistent compliance with regulatory rqmts
Consistent adoption of industry best practices
Alignment of global industry safety strategies
Sufficient number of qualified personnel
No gaps in use of technology to enhance safety
17
The Global Safety Roadmap: Part 2
• A detailed plan intended to guide
Roadmap implementation plans
by regional safety teams.
• Best Practices described for each
Objective.
• Metrics provided for each Best
Practice.
• A four-level Maturity Model
provided for each Objective based
on implementation of Best
Practices.
• Process described to assess
current status and gaps that need
to be addressed.
• Delivered to ICAO on 4 December
2006.
18
Implementing the Roadmap
Regional Safety Enhancement Plan
Development Process
19
Maturity Model to Guide Gap Analysis
20
Developing a Best Practice Approach
21
Focus Area 2 Objectives
Focus Area 2 – Inconsistent Regulatory Oversight
•
Objective 2a – States ensure their Regulatory
Authority is independent, competent and adequately
funded. Establish an independent mechanism to
monitor competency of Regulatory Authority.
•
Objective 2b – ICAO USOAP, or other equivalent
means of assessment, continue to review compliance
with international SARPs, coordinated international
support being provided where necessary.
22
Best Practices: Objective 2a
Inconsistent Regulatory Oversight
Table 2a –Best Practices
Metrics
BP 2a-1 – State utilizes/implements the 8
critical elements of the safety oversight
system.
Primary aviation legislation
Specific operating regulations
CAA structure and safety oversight functions
Technical guidance
Qualified technical personnel
Licensing and certification obligations
Continued surveillance obligations
Resolution of safety issues
• State implements in
accordance with ICAO
Doc 9734, Part A,
Chapter 3
BP 2a-2 – State provides a mechanism for
sufficient funding of safety oversight
activities.
a.USOAP ORG 2.051
23
Best Practices: Objective 2a
Inconsistent Regulatory Oversight
Table 2a –Best Practices
Metrics
BP 2a-3 – State applies the principles of risk
management to its safety related activities.
a.
Hazards and risks are assessed and prioritized on a
regular basis.
b.
Risk mitigation strategies are developed and
implemented.
c.
Results are assessed and corrective action taken as
needed.
a. ICAO Doc. 9859,
para. 3.3
b. Attendance at
ICAO SMS
Training Course
BP 2a-4 – The Regulatory Authority acts independently
where safety issues are implicated in its actions.
a. The individuals responsible for such action must be
given appropriate authority to exercise their
responsibilities.
b. Accountability for the exercise of regulatory authority
must be in accordance with the principles of a “just
culture” (see Objective 3a for a discussion of “just
culture”).
a.
b.
USOAP LEG
1.109; USOAP
1.111
Annex 13,
Attachment E;
i.e. USOAP
AIG 6.505
24
Maturity Table: Focus Area 2
Inconsistent Regulatory Oversight
Maturity Level
Capability
Level 1 – Developing
•
•
Level 2 – Areas
Identified for
Improvement
•
•
Low level of implementation of SARPs and little or no
attempt to correct the situation is in progress
State unable or unwilling to exercise oversight.
[Added significance if a large part of the aviation
activity under the oversight of the State occurs in other
States.]
State aware of and attempting to correct deficiencies,
but has not completed implementation of corrective
action.
There is no certainty that the State is able to provide
proper oversight for existing level of activity.
25
Maturity Table: Focus Area 2
Inconsistent Regulatory Oversight
Maturity Level
Capability
Level 3 – Evolving –
Changes in work
• State has the capacity to exercise oversight on the
type of operation for which it has responsibility.
• State has limited ability to continue oversight if there
are:
• A significant increase in the volume or scope of
activities;
• Improvements in technology.
Level 4 – Highly
Evolved
• State, aware of its level of compliance, has
implemented appropriate SARPs and has access to
the resources necessary to support the existing
activities.
• State has process in place and access to the
necessary resources to continually reassess and
maintain its level of compliance in light of
modifications to SARPs and changes in activity within
its jurisdiction.
26
Global Aviation Safety Roadmap
 Part I and Part II are available on the ICAO
Flight Safety Exchange (FSIX) – Library
Section
http://www.icao.int/fsix/library1.cfm
27
Conclusions
Maturity level
Best practices
 What do we do next?
28
Thank You
29