Transcript LMA cohesion_french team_june2012

Young Planners Working Group
Planning and territorial cohesion
Lille metropolis area cohesion
Third phase of Workshop:
SWOT analysis
French team
june 2012
SWOT analysis
• Analysis of each item
▫ Governance
▫ Mobility
▫ Housing
▫ (coming soon : economic !)
Local Governance: between the administrative division and the
metropolitan polarization
Reminder: in France, intercommunal cooperation structures
have not local government, they are cooperation structures
• The MLA is not an administrative or planning entity
An association providing good practices, a study area to support the metropolitan
dynamism
• The democratic process tend to justify the classic administrative entities
No policy maker is elected to conduct Lille Metropolis or MLA, the citizens may find
the policies a bit technocratic or incomprehensible.
• Administration and planning, two warring brothers ?
A legal process in favour metropolitan planning but an administration that will not
disappear
Planning as a key factor to enhance local dynamism
• SCOT (coherent territorial plan): ties together the various public
urban planning policies
A kind of large scale masterplan providing objectives in attempt to
guarantee territory cohesion through sectorial policies
• The local urbanism plan (PLU) at a communal regulatory level
Lille Metropolis’ PLU is made at an intercommunal level
• Cooperation beyond boundaries
 Planning and development agency of Lille Metropolis and Coalfield Mission
conducting studies for AML
 Commercial chambers concerting economic world
 Stakeholders meeting in Grand Lille Committee
 Toward planning supported by AML ?
Toward a metropolitan governance
Mobility and main infrastructures
• RAILWAY NETWORK
• LMA is particularly well placed on the northeuropean high-speed train netwok
• Eurallile district as a symbol of Lille as
triangle center of Brussels/London/Paris
• High-speed train-plane relationship via Paris
or Brussels Airport improve area accessibility
•
Lille Airport isn’t efficient due to accessibility
to this two airports and railway network
• Regional railway network is quite efficient
but a lake of links between LMA french and
belgium regions
• RET-GV : using high-speed trains to intern
transportation is a cohesion factor…and also
is too expensive
Mobility and main infrastructures
• FREIGHT AND WATERWAY
• LMA is a hub for freight :
• Easy acces to northern range of sea ports
• (like Antwerp, Rotterdam,..)
• Array of waterway, road and rail services
• Delta 3 Dourges hub
• North seine europe canal in 2017
• ROADS
• Interface of motorways
• Traffic congestion around Lille due to :
• Many people and goods
• Urban developments where car is needed each day
• PUBLIC URBAN TRANSPORTATION
• Need to develop offer(bus and tram-train routes)
• Try to facilitate mobility :
• New hubs
• Combined prices
Mobility and main infrastructures
Strenght
Weakness
•the high speed rail,
•waterways
•political ready to improving cross-border links
•Airport
•heavy traffic and traffic jam in south of Lille
important rate of people without personal car
Opportunities
Threatness
•freight rail highway (Lille/paris/hendaye)
•canal North Seine (Cambrai/paris)
•provision of information and the establishment
of intermodal pricing throughout the LMA (public
transportation)
•subsidy of the region railway system
•urban development without efficient public
transportation
Housing
• Inside a territory of cohesion, the residential mobility must be possible so that a feeling
of common identity exists and so that do not develop sectors hollow of a territorial
cohesion on a wider territory.
• We shall observe the sectors where the housing stock presents specificities susceptible
to reveal a defect of territorial cohesion.
• WORKING ORIENTATIONS
• The constitution of the housing stock:
•
•
small housing in city center and big housing in periphery. This fact determines on the
French part more than on the Belgian part the choices of residential localization of the
residents, according to their age.
On this point, an interview with a property developer could let us understand the logics of
construction which takes to this specialization.
• The state of the housing stock:
•
•
we can observe a deterioration of housing on some old worker residential areas. In the
centers-city of the Urban Community of Lille, big housing exist, but because of their state
they are unhabited.
An interview with an association which works in urban regeneration then with the Urban
Community of Lille could allow us to know the means and the actors implied in the answer
to this phenomenon.
Housing
• WORKING ORIENTATIONS
• The price of housing:
• according to places, the prices of housings are very diversified.
• An interview with a social social lessor could allow us to understand the
possibilities of rebalancing of the offer of housing.
• The localization of housing and the access to the services and to the jobs:
• big infrastructures of transport keep some residential areas at a distance.
These same infrastructures connect residential areas in pole of jobs.
• An analysis of the territory will have to allow us to understand this point.
• The disparities of territories seem less important on the Belgian part.
They seem particularly important inside of the territory of the Urban
Community of Lille. It is also the most urban territory of the
metropolitan Area of Lille.
Housing
Strenght
- Diversified housing stock
- Patrimonial quality (common
identity) of housing on some
sectors
- Important urban poles
Opportunities
- Attractive territory thanks to its
level of equipments
- Well localized not built sectors
Weakness
- Local specializations of the offer
of housing
- Difficulties of maintenance of
some housing
-Contrasted territories
Threatness
- Fractures in the territory owed to
the infrastructures of transport
Projets/targets
• Develop the identical aspect old residential areas
•Development of a local governance
•Promote the creation of poles:
Diversified housing stock, connected with equipments and
jobs, around the symbolic places.
• Act on the localization of the urban development
•Participate in the definition of the projects of
infratrsuctures
•Define equipments to be developed
Thanks !