Westpoint Vet Group

Download Report

Transcript Westpoint Vet Group

Are there any regional
differences in TB
controls for calves?
Rob Drysdale MRCVS
Westpoint Veterinary Group Ltd
Who is Rob Drysdale MRCVS?
•
•
•
•
Managing Director Westpoint Vet Group Ltd
Farm vet for 17 years
Particular interest in calf health and welfare
Vet to Blade Farming SW Ltd:
– Complete and integrated beef supply chain
– Produced more nearly 20,000 calves last year
– UK’s largest integrated beef producer
Westpoint Vet Group
• 16 practices across UK with 50 farm vets
• Total practice over 3,000 clients
• 250+ dairy farms:
– More than 90,000 dairy cows (av herd 350 cows)
– Low input extensive to high input intensive
• Over 300,000 head of beef and youngstock:
– Fattening units from 100 to 8,000 head/year
– Suckler farms from 20 to 1,000 cows
Background
• Calf Forum Strategy Group project
• Investigate the impact of TB on dairy units
in different regions of the UK
• Meeting with WVG Senior Vets twice
yearly had raised issues of how the
varying regions interpret TB annexes
• Blade Farming experiences – rearing units
and supplying dairy farmers
Approved Quarantine Units?
AQU system – works for Blade
Blade Farming and AQUs
•
•
•
•
Frustration for calf supply chain
Richard Phelps could see potential
Started in 2005 with 1 x TB approved unit
Now have several sheds on several farms
each with own TB licence as AQU
• Capacity of around 2,000 calves per cycle
• Around 1.5 cycles per AQU per year
Blade Farming and AQUs
•
•
•
•
•
•
System works with local AHVLA support
Retailer and processor support
Breeds – many but B&W difficult to justify
Great value weaned “store” cattle
Move to finishers on contract for slaughter
Dedicated farmers and also occasional
purchasers
AQU system can work
Background
• WVG practices split into 5 English regions
• Director or Senior Vet heads up each area
• Regions have different DEFRA offices
managing them
• Vets and farmers frustrated through
different approaches by DEFRA Vets
• AHVLA – new team from 2011
Background
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Five distinct regions – AHVLA offices:
North West = Carlisle
Midlands = Stafford
East Anglia = Chelmsford now Reading
South West = Truro and Exeter
South East = Reading
10 units SW Scotland with 10,000 cows
Blade Farming – TB controls
North West
•
•
•
•
•
•
41 dairy farms with 15,000 cows
4 holdings under TB restriction last 2 years
No units currently under restriction
No local TB controlled rearing available
All bull calves shot
Approx 400 calves shot in period
Midlands
•
•
•
•
27 dairy farms with 5,700 cows
11 holdings TB restricted last 2 years
5 units currently under restriction
Little support for TB controlled rearing in
region and DEFRA “seems unwilling” to
support
• Not all bull calves shot
• Approx 500 calves shot in period
East Anglia
•
•
•
•
28 dairy farms with 6,900 cows
No holdings TB restricted last 2 years
Beef units affected with 3 under restriction
Good support for TB controlled rearing in
region with one specialist finishing unit in
place
• No bull calves shot!
South East
•
•
•
•
65 dairy farms with >34,000 cows
18 holdings TB restricted last 2 years
4 units currently under restriction
Varying support for TB controlled rearing
in region. No specialist rearing or finishing
units in place
• Over 500 bull calves shot!
South West
• 50 dairy farms with >18,000 cows
• Only 12 holdings not been affected by TB
restrictions in last 2 years
• 20+ units currently under restriction (dairy)
• Good support locally TB controlled rearing
in region. Several specialist rearing and
finishing units in place
WVG and TB in South West
•
•
•
•
Working with 8 AQU sheds
Handling total of 1,000 calves each cycle
Average of 1.7 cycles per year
Total beef x and dairy bull calves on the
current restricted farms = 3,000+
• 3 x actual TB breakdowns in last 4 years
• Estimate over 1,000 B&W calves shot!
Conclusions (1)
• All collated from WVG vets and practices?
• Frustration felt by farmers and vets:
– Veterinary variation – advice AHVLA
– Regional variation – implementation of TB
control measures
– Wastage when system is meant to be in place
• Now the regulations have been updated
again
Conclusions (2)
• Drawbacks exist – the system is not
perfect even when working:
– Spread of disease potential risk
– TB test is not infallible (70% sensitive?)
– Extreme biosecurity needs to be considered
• Testing procedures and systems could be
better?
• No new AQUs being licensed in SW?
Over to you – any questions?