ppt - Common Solutions Group
Download
Report
Transcript ppt - Common Solutions Group
A CSG Presentation
January 5, 2005
Tom Ball
Manager
Voice Network Engineering
[email protected]
Agenda
► VoIP
and Cornell, Our Situation
► Campus Life Concerns
► Student Survey
► Cellular Activity
► Summary
Legacy PBX Environment
► What’s
our plan?
► When are we going…?
► Why….why not?
Current PBX
► PBX
environment since 1985
► AVAYA DEFINITY PBX
► Avaya
Communication Manager 1.3
► IP
capable PBX supporting soft / hard phones and
voice gateways
► RFP replaced old G2.2 with G3r in 2001
“Who Knew?” … seamless transition …
► The
plan was to be fully capitalized by June of
2005
In 2000, knew VoIP was coming…
VoIP Technical Considerations
►
Common Building Infrastructure
Not all Cat 5/6
Long term upgrade plan…. “EzraNet”
►
Data Network
Feel good about existing bandwidth & capacity
Not PoE capable switches
Edge network not on UPS
►
Emergency Power
Large investment to do so
►
911 Location Assurance
Data Network jack locations are not as accurate in databases
VoIP Social Considerations
► Managing
expectations of reliability
Voice Vs. Data availability
► Re-tooling
and re-training of personnel
Not just the technical staff…
► Concept
of change & users
You’re thinking of taking out my old phone?!
VoIP Financial Considerations
► Justify
the full, or partial replacement of a
fully capitalized, up to date PBX.
► Are there really significant costs savings?
►IE:
Proprietary Digital set Vs. IP HardPhone
PoE switches
Additional UPS systems
►PSTN
savings?
►Potential Savings for moves, adds & changes?
Graduate Student Thesis, 2003
“Internet Protocol Telephony and The Future
of Cornell University’s Telephone System”
By: Kevin Byrnes, Graig Diamond, Jonathan Wang
Master of Engineering Project Report, sponsored by
the Office of Information Technologies at Cornell
University.
‘
Scope
► The
existing voice and data networks at Cornell
were analyzed
Voice PBX
Data network, core, edge, I1/2 connectivity
Infrastructure (copper and fiber)
Local / LD costs
Historical traffic trends
Financial considerations
Power systems
911
VoIP Report Conclusions
►
Did not recommend an aggressive conversion to VoIP due
to:
Full ownership of campus area network
PBX status (capabilities and ownership)
911 solutions for VoIP are currently weak
Emergency Power / UPS considerations
No recognizable voice WAN cost savings
80% of Wiring Infrastructure not CAT 5e/6
Recommended developing a plan to move common
infrastructure towards supporting VoIP services.
► Stay in tune with developments…
►
Voice Network Vision
► Leverage
existing PBX investment
► Deploy IP enabled endpoints off the PBX
where feasible and economically justified
► Develop a long term migration plan for the
current PBX
► Evaluate how to best provide for future VoIP
/ SIP capability
Tough Questions - Campus Life
► Students:
about 4800 phones.
CIT faced questions like:
►“We
want to lower our costs”
►“Can we rip phones out?”
►“Has CIT thought about alternatives for students like
cellular?”
Approach
► Formed
a committee of stakeholders
CIT
Campus Life
Cornell Police
Environmental Health and Safety
Purchasing Office
Committee Discussion
► CIT
offering wireless voice services?
► Removing phones from the Residence Halls?
► Cellular Services?
► Do VoIP technologies fit here?
► What about 911 assurance?
Committee Q’s
► We
had good discussions, candid thoughts,
but no answers….
Is there risk in providing wireless IP devices and
NOT providing specific 911 detail?
Cellular in lieu of wired?
We knew others are doing this…so why not?
To Counsel and Risk Management
► “Is
there a requirement to continue
providing wired voice service to students?”
Cellular?
► “What
if we cannot provide exact location
information to the police for 911 purposes?”
Softphones / Cellular
Outcomes
►
►
►
Providing wired phones is essentially a business decision,
however:
Need a business plan for further review
More emergency phones / blue lights
Cellular network reliability and availability concerns
Clearly define and communicate expectations for these
devices relative to 911.
“This is not your primary means of communications for
911 purposes…use a wired phone or a blue light if
threatened”
Must address how wireless devices will fit into 911 and
emergency services scheme. (?)
Now What?
► Need
to better understand student
perspectives
► Fall student survey…
Annual incoming Freshman
Q’s: Scale of 1 to 5
About 1,100 respondents
Student Survey Questions
ResNet Phone vs. Cellular
►
I depend on my ResNet phone in my room
►
I currently have a cell phone I brought with me
►
If Cornell offered a cellular service I would use it
►
I would like a service that rings my cell phone when my
ResNet phone rings
►
My cell phone works well in my residence hall.
I depend on my ResNet Phone
313
27% agreed
18% neutral
55% said NO
285
192
197
Agree
Neutral
105
Strongly Agree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
I currently have a cell phone
677
85% agreed
14% don’t
1% not sure…?
252
117
Strongly Agree
Agree
14
32
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
If Cornell offered a cell service, I
would use it
22% agreed
40% weren’t sure
38% said no…
437
271
174
142
68
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
I would like a service that rings my cell
phone when my ResNet phone rings
336
291
46% agreed
27% neutral
28% said NO
202
163
102
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
My Cell Works well within my
Residence Hall
330
257
36% agreed
17% were neutral
47% said NO
186
178
Neutral
Disagree
140
Strongly Agree
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
Cellular Activities
► Working
with primary cellular providers to:
Improve existing macro coverage
In-Building coverage
► Discover
developments with next generation
networks: CDMA / GSM
Meeting with carriers for network updates and
technology “chalk talks”
► Site
more companies to help offset the loss in
traditional voice revenues….
Pending Pilot
► Extension
to Cellular (EC-500)
Cell phone bridging feature with AVAYA PBX
Additional product?
►Staff….clear
interest
►Students….not sure
Determine impacts on trunk utilization
Closing
► Continue
to evaluate next steps to support
VoIP and SIP
► Further define requirements with respect to
emergency services
► Better understand financial impacts of
legacy vs. IP model for our PBX.