Transcript The California Institute for Telecommunications and

Year End Report on the
NSF OptIPuter ITR Project
NSF ANIR Division
Arlington, VA
December 12, 2002
Dr. Larry Smarr
Director, California Institute for Telecommunications and
Information Technologies
Harry E. Gruber Professor,
Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering
Jacobs School of Engineering, UCSD
The Move to Data-Intensive Science & Engineeringe-Science Community Resources
ALMA
LHC
Sloan Digital Sky Survey
ATLAS
A LambdaGrid Will Be
the Backbone for an e-Science Network
Apps Middleware
Clusters
Dynamically
Allocated
Lightpaths
Switch Fabrics
Physical
Monitoring
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
P
L
A
N
E
Source: Joe Mambretti, NU
Just Like in Computing -Different FLOPS for Different Folks
A -> Need Full Internet Routing
B -> Need VPN Services On/And Full
Internet Routing
C -> Need Very Fat Pipes, Limited
Multiple Virtual Organizations
Bandwidth
consumed
A
Number of
users
B
DSL
C
GigE LAN
Source: Cees Delaat
Response—The OptIPuter Project
OptIPuter NSF Proposal Partnered with
National Experts and Infrastructure
Asia
Pacific
Vancouver
Seattle
Portland
CA*net4
Pacific
Light
Rail
Chicago
UIC
NU
San Francisco
Asia
Pacific
SURFnet
CERN
PSC
NYC
NCSA
USC
Los Angeles UCI
UCSD, SDSU
San Diego
(SDSC)
Atlanta
AMPATH
Source: Tom DeFanti and Maxine Brown, UIC
The OptIPuter
Is an Experimental Network Project
• Construction of a DWDM-Based WAN Testbed
– Capability To Configure Lambdas In Real-time
– Scalable Linux Clusters
– Large Data Resources
• Distributed Visualization and Collaboration Applications for a
Bandwidth-Rich Environment
• Leading Edge Applications Drivers, Each Requiring On-Line
Visualization Of Terabytes Of Data
– Neurosciences Data Analysis
– Earth Sciences Data Analysis
• Software Research
– LambdaGrid Software Stack
– Rethink TCP/IP Protocols
– Enhance Security Mechanisms
Source: Andrew Chien, UCSD
The OptIPuter
Frontier Advisory Board
•
Optical Component Research
–
–
–
–
–
•
Optical Networking Systems
–
–
–
–
–
•
Yannis Papakonstantinou, UCSD
Paul Siegel, UCSD
Clusters, Grid, and Computing
–
–
–
•
George Papen, UCSD
Joe Mambretti, Northwestern University
Steve Wallach, Chiaro Networks, Ltd.
George Clapp, Telcordia/SAIC
Tom West, CENIC
Data and Storage
–
–
•
Shaya Fainman, UCSD
Sadik Esener, UCSD
Alan Willner, USC
Frank Shi, UCI
Joe Ford, UCSD
Alan Benner, IBM eServer Group, Systems Architecture and Performance department
Fran Berman, SDSC director
Ian Foster, Argonne National Laboratory
Generalists
–
–
–
Franz Birkner, FXB Ventures and San Diego Telecom Council
Forest Baskett, Venture Partner with New Enterprise Associates
Mohan Trivedi, UCSD
First Meeting February 6-7, 2003
The First OptIPuter Workshop
on Optical Switch Products
• Hosted by Calit2 @ UCSD
– October 25, 2002
– Organized by Maxine Brown (UIC) and Greg Hidley (UCSD)
– Full Day Open Presentations by Vendors and OptIPuter Team
• Examined Variety of Technology Offerings:
– OEOEO
– TeraBurst Networks
– OEO
– Chiaro Networks
– OOO
– Glimmerglass
– Calient
– IMMI
OptIPuter Inspiration--Node of
a 2009 PetaFLOPS Supercomputer
DRAM – 16 GB
DRAM
- 4MB
GB- -HIGHLY
HIGHLYINTERLEAVED
INTERLEAVED
64/256
5 Terabits/s
MULTI-LAMBDA
Optical Network
CROSS BAR
2nd LEVEL CACHE
Coherence
8 MB
640 GB/s
2nd LEVEL CACHE
8 MB
24 Bytes wide
240 GB/s
VLIW/RISC CORE
40 GFLOPS
10 GHz
...
24 Bytes wide
240 GB/s
VLIW/RISC CORE
40 GFLOPS
10 GHz
Updated From Steve Wallach, Supercomputing 2000 Keynote
Global Architecture of a 2009 COTS
PetaFLOPS System
10 meters=
50 nanosec Delay
3
2
4
5 ...
16
1
128 Die/Box
4 CPU/Die
17
64
ALL-OPTICAL
SWITCH
63
...
18
...
32
49
48
47
I/O
LAN/WAN
... 33 Multi-Die
Multi-Processor
46
Source: Steve Wallach, Supercomputing 2000 Keynote
Supercomputer Design 2010
Semi-Conductor & System Trends
• Billions Of Transistors
– Multiple Processors On A Die
– On Board Cache And Dram Memory (PIM)
– Latency To Memory Scales With Clock (Same Die)
• System Characteristics
– Speed Of Light Becomes Limiting Factor In The Latency
For Large Systems
– “c” Does Not Scale With Lithography
– Systems Become GRID Enabled
Source: Steve Wallach, Chiaro Networks
WAN & LAN Bandwidth
Are Converging
Bandwidth - Gbits/sec
1000
100
WAN
LAN
10
1
1998
2001
2004
2007
0.1
Year - General Availability
Source: Steve Wallach, Chiaro Networks
Convergence of Networking Fabrics
• Today's Computer Room
– Router For External Communications (WAN)
– Ethernet Switch For Internal Networking (LAN)
– Fibre Channel For Internal Networked Storage (SAN)
• Tomorrow's Grid Room
– A Unified Architecture Of LAN/WAN/SAN Switching
– More Cost Effective
– One Network Element vs. Many
– One Sphere of Scalability
– ALL Resources are GRID Enabled
– Layer 3 Switching and Addressing Throughout
Source: Steve Wallach, Chiaro Networks
The OptIPuter Philosophy
Bandwidth is getting cheaper faster than storage.
Storage is getting cheaper faster than computing.
Exponentials are crossing.
“A global economy designed
to waste transistors, power, and silicon area
-and conserve bandwidth above allis breaking apart and reorganizing itself
to waste bandwidth
and conserve power, silicon area, and transistors."
George Gilder Telecosm (2000)
From SuperComputers to SuperNetworks-Changing the Grid Design Point
• The TeraGrid is Optimized for Computing
–
–
–
–
1024 IA-64 Nodes Linux Cluster
Assume 1 GigE per Node = 1 Terabit/s I/O
Grid Optical Connection 4x10Gig Lambdas = 40 Gigabit/s
Optical Connections are Only 4% Bisection Bandwidth
• The OptIPuter is Optimized for Bandwidth
–
–
–
–
32 IA-64 Node Linux Cluster
Assume 1 GigE per Processor = 32 gigabit/s I/O
Grid Optical Connection 4x10GigE = 40 Gigabit/s
Optical Connections are Over 100% Bisection Bandwidth
Data Intensive Scientific Applications
Require Experimental Optical Networks
• Large Data Challenges in Neuro and Earth Sciences
– Each Data Object is 3D and Gigabytes
– Data are Generated and Stored in Distributed Archives
– Research is Carried Out on Federated Repository
• Requirements
–
–
–
–
Computing Requirements  PC Clusters
Communications  Dedicated Lambdas Over Fiber
Data  Large Peer-to-Peer Lambda Attached Storage
Visualization  Collaborative Volume Algorithms
• Response
– OptIPuter Research Project
The Biomedical Informatics Research Network
a Multi-Scale Brain Imaging Federated Repository
BIRN Test-beds:
Multiscale Mouse Models of Disease, Human Brain Morphometrics, and
FIRST BIRN (10 site project for fMRI’s of Schizophrenics)
NIH Plans to Expand
to Other Organs
and Many Laboratories
Microscopy Imaging of Neural Tissue
Marketta Bobik
Francisco Capani & Eric Bushong
Confocal image of a sagittal section through rat cortex
triple labeled for
glial fibrillary acidic protein (blue),
neurofilaments (green) and actin (red)
Projection of a series of optical sections
through a Purkinje neuron
revealing both the overall morphology (red)
and the dendritic spines (green)
http://ncmir.ucsd.edu/gallery.html
Interactive Visual Analysis of Large Datasets -East Pacific Rise Seafloor Topography
Scripps Institution of Oceanography Visualization Center
http://siovizcenter.ucsd.edu/library/gallery/shoot1/index.shtml
Tidal Wave Threat Analysis
Using Lake Tahoe Bathymetry
Graham Kent, SIO
Scripps Institution of Oceanography Visualization Center
http://siovizcenter.ucsd.edu/library/gallery/shoot1/index.shtml
SIO Uses the Visualization Center
to Teach a Wide Variety of Graduate Classes
•
•
•
•
Geodesy
Gravity and Geomagnetism
Planetary Physics
Radar and Sonar Interferometry
•
•
•
Seismology
Tectonics
Time Series Analysis
Deborah Kilb & Frank Vernon, SIO
Multiple Interactive Views of Seismic Epicenter and Topography Databases
http://siovizcenter.ucsd.edu/library/gallery/shoot2/index.shtml
OptIPuter LambdaGrid
Enabled by Chiaro Networking Router
www.calit2.net/news/2002/11-18-chiaro.html
Medical Imaging
and Microscopy
Chemistry,
Engineering, Arts
switch
switch
• Cluster – Disk
• Disk – Disk
Chiaro
Enstara
• Viz – Disk
• DB – Cluster
switch
switch
San Diego
Supercomputer Center
• Cluster – Cluster
Scripps Institution of
Oceanography
Image Source: Phil Papadopoulos, SDSC
The OptIPuter Experimental
The UCSD OptIPuter Deployment
UCSD Campus Optical Network
To CENIC
Phase I, Fall 02
Phase II, 2003
Collocation point
Production Router (Planned)
SDSC
SDSC
SDSC
SDSC
Annex
Annex
JSOE
Engineering
CRCA
Arts
SOM
Medicine
Roughly,
$0.20 / Strand-Foot
Chemistry
Phys.
Sci Keck
Preuss
High
School
6th
Undergrad
College
College
UCSD New Cost Sharing
Roughly $250k of
Dedicated Fiber
Node M
Collocation
Chiaro Router
(Installed Nov 18, 2002)
SIO
Earth
Sciences
½ Mile
Source: Phil Papadopoulos, SDSC; Greg Hidley, Cal-(IT)2
Planned Chicago Metro
Lambda Switching OptIPuter Laboratory
Internationals: Canada, Holland, CERN, GTRN, AmPATH, Asia…
Int’l GE, 10GE
16x1 GE
16x10 GE
Metro GE, 10GE
16-Processor McKinley
at University of Illinois
at Chicago
10x1 GE
+
1x10GE
Nat’l GE,
16-Processor
Montecito/Chivano
at Northwestern
10GE
StarLight
Nationals: Illinois, California, Wisconsin, Indiana,
Abilene, FedNets. Washington, Pennsylvania…
Source: Tom DeFanti, UIC
OptIPuter Software Research
•
Near-term: Build Software To Support Advancement Of Applications With
Traditional Models
– High Speed IP Protocol Variations (RBUDP, SABUL, …)
– Switch Control Software For DWDM Management And Dynamic Setup
– Distributed Configuration Management For OptIPuter Systems
•
Long-Term Goals To Develop:
– System Model Which Supports Grid, Single System, And Multi-System Views
– Architectures Which Can:
– Harness High Speed DWDM
– Present To The Applications And Protocols
– New Communication Abstractions Which Make Lambda-Based
Communication Easily Usable
– New Communication & Data Services Which Exploit The Underlying
Communication Abstractions
– Underlying Data Movement & Management Protocols Supporting These
Services
– “Killer App” Drivers And Demonstrations Which Leverage This Capability
Into The Wireless Internet
Source: Andrew Chien, UCSD
OptIPuter System Opportunities
•
•
What’s The Right View Of The System?
Grid View
– Federation Of Systems – Autonomously Managed, Separate Security, No
Implied Trust Relationships, No Transitive Trust
– High Overhead – Administrative And Performance
– Web Services And Grid Services View
•
Single System View
– More Static Federation Of Systems
– A Single Trusted Administrative Control, Implied Trust Relationships,
Transitive Trust Relationships
– But This Is Not Quite A Closed System Box
– High Performance
– Securing A Basic System And Its Capabilities
– Communication, Data, Operating System Coordination Issues
•
Multi-System View
– Can We Create Single System Views Out Of Grid System Views?
– Delivering The Performance; Boundaries On Trust
Source: Andrew Chien, UCSD
OptIPuter Communication Challenges
•
Terminating A Terabit Link In An Application System
– --> Not A Router
•
Parallel Termination With Commodity Components
– N 10GigE Links -> N Clustered Machines (Low Cost)
– Community-Based Communication
•
What Are:
– Efficient Protocols to Move Data in Local, Metropolitan, Wide Area?
– High Bandwidth, Low Startup
– Dedicated Channels, Shared Endpoints
– Good Parallel Abstractions For Communication?
– Coordinate Management And Use Of Endpoints And Channels
– Convenient For Application, Storage System
– Secure Models For “Single System View”
– Enabled By “Lambda” Private Channels
– Exploit Flexible Dispersion Of Data And Computation
Source: Andrew Chien, UCSD
OptIPuter Storage Challenges
•
DWDM Enables Uniform Performance View Of Storage
– How To Exploit Capability?
– Other Challenges Remain: Security, Coherence, Parallelism
– “Storage Is a Network Device”
•
Grid View: High-Level Storage Federation
–
–
–
–
•
Single-System View: Low-Level Storage Federation
–
–
–
–
•
GridFTP (Distributed File Sharing)
NAS – File System Protocols
Access-control and Security in Protocol
Performance?
Secure Single System View
SAN – Block Level Disk and Controller Protocols
High Performance
Security? Access Control?
Secure Distributed Storage: Threshold Cryptography Based Distribution
– PASIS Style – Distributed Shared Secrets
– Lambda’s Minimize Performance Penalty
Source: Andrew Chien, UCSD
Two Visits Between UIC’s Jason Leigh
and UCSD’s NCMIR
• NCMIR Provided EVL:
– EVL Will Prepare Data For Visualization On Tiled Display Systems.
– With Large Mosaics And Large Format Tomography Data
• EVL Has Provided NCMIR with:
– ImmersaView (Passive Stereo Wall Software) to Use In SOM
Conference Room Passive Stereo Projection System
– System Has Been Installed And Is Working
– SOM Investigating Use Of Quanta Memory To Memory (UDP Based)
Block Data Transfer Protocol For A Number Of Applications
• EVL and NCMIR Are:
– Looking Into Adopting Concepts/Code From Utah's Transfer Function
GUIs For Displaying Voxel Visualization On Display Walls
– Have Made Plans To Collaborate On The Development Of The
Physical Design Of The SOM IBM 9M Pixel Active 3D Display
Similar Results for SIO
OptIPuter is Exploring Quanta
as a High Performance Middleware
• Quanta is a high performance networking toolkit / API.
• Reliable Blast UDP:
– Assumes you are running over an over-provisioned or dedicated
network.
– Excellent for photonic networks, don’t try this on commodity
Internet.
– It is FAST!
– It is very predictable.
– We give you a prediction equation to predict performance. This is
useful for the application.
– It is most suited for transfering very large payloads.
– At higher data rates processor is 100% loaded so dual processors
are needed for your application to move data and do useful work at
the same time.
Source: Jason Leigh, UIC
Reliable Blast UDP (RBUDP)
• At IGrid 2002 all applications which were able to make the most
effective use of the 10G link from Chicago to Amsterdam used
UDP
• RBUDP[1], SABUL[2] and Tsunami[3] are all similar protocols
that use UDP for bulk data transfer- all of which are based on
NETBLT- RFC969
• RBUDP has fewer memory copies & a prediction function to let
applications know what kind of performance to expect.
– [1] J. Leigh, O. Yu, D. Schonfeld, R. Ansari, et al., Adaptive
Networking for Tele-Immersion, Proc. Immersive Projection
Technology/Eurographics Virtual Environments Workshop
(IPT/EGVE), May 16-18, Stuttgart, Germany, 2001.
– [2] Sivakumar Harinath, Data Management Support for Distributed
Data Mining of Large Datasets over High Speed Wide Area Networks,
PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2002.
– [3] http://www.indiana.edu/~anml/anmlresearch.html
Source: Jason Leigh, UIC
Visualization at Near Photographic Resolution
The OptIPanel Version I
5x3 Grid of 1280x1024 Pixel LCD Panels Driven by 16-PC Cluster
Resolution=6400x3072 Pixels,
or ~3000x1500 pixels in Autostereo
Source: Tom DeFanti, EVL--UIC
NTT Super High Definition Video
(NTT 4Kx2K=8 Megapixels) Over Internet2
Applications:
Astronomy
Mathematics
Entertainment
Starlight
in Chicago
www.ntt.co.jp/news/news02e/0211/021113.html
SHD
= 4xHDTV
= 16xDVD
USC
In Los Angeles
The Continuum at EVL and TRECC
OptIPuter Amplified Work Environment
Passive stereo display
AccessGrid
Digital white board
Tiled display
Source: Tom DeFanti, Electronic Visualization Lab, UIC
GeoWall at the American Geophysical Union
Dec 2003
Source: John Orcutt, SIO, President AGU
OptIPuter Transforms Individual Laboratory
Visualization, Computation, & Analysis Facilities
Fast polygon and
volume rendering
with stereographics
+
GeoWall
= 3D APPLICATIONS:
Earth Science
Underground
Earth Science
Anatomy
Neuroscience
GeoFusion GeoMatrix Toolkit
Rob Mellors and Eric Frost, SDSU
SDSC Volume Explorer
Visible Human Project
NLM, Brooks AFB,
SDSC Volume Explorer
Dave Nadeau, SDSC, BIRN
SDSC Volume Explorer
The Preuss School UCSD OptIPuter Facility
I-Light
Indiana’s Fiber Optic Initiative
• First University Owned and Operated State Fiber Infrastructure
–
–
–
–
Indiana University Bloomington
Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)
Purdue University’s West Lafayette Campus
Internet2 Network Operations Center
• Funded with a $5.3 Million State Appropriation 1999
• I-Light Network Launched on December 11, 2001
• Currently 1 and 10 GigE Lambdas
I-Light Campus Commodity Internet Usage
Is Approaching 1 Gbps
Purdue
Inbound
Outbound
IU
IHETS/ITN
Owning Fiber Allows for
Large Multi-Year Bandwidth Capacity Growth
Assumes All Fibers Lit
Using Advanced DWDM
Running Multiple 10Gbps
Lambda On Each Fiber
A Representation Of
The Growth In
Theoretical Capacity
of The Connection
Between IUB And
IUPUI
Total Bandwidth
as of January 2002
Source: Indiana University
iGrid 2002
September 24-26, 2002, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
• Fifteen Countries/Locations Proposing 28 Demonstrations:
Canada, CERN, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, The
Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United
Kingdom, United States
• Applications Demonstrated: Art, Bioinformatics, Chemistry,
Cosmology, Cultural Heritage, Education, High-Definition Media
Streaming, Manufacturing, Medicine, Neuroscience, Physics,
Tele-science
• Grid Technologies: Grid Middleware, Data Management/
Replication Grids, Visualization Grids, Computational Grids,
Access Grids, Grid Portal Sponsors: HP, IBM, Cisco, Philips,
Level (3), Glimmerglass, etc.
UIC
www.startap.net/igrid2002
iGrid 2002 Was Sustaining 1-3 Gigabits/s
Total Available Bandwidth
Between Chicago and Amsterdam
Was 30 Gigabit/s
Providing a 21st Century
Internet Grid Infrastructure
Wireless Sensor Nets, Personal Communicators
Routers
Tightly Coupled Optically-Connected OptIPuter Core
Routers
Loosely Coupled Peer-to-Peer Computing & Storage