Transcript Document

Sensor Networks –
Trend, Applications, & Design
Polly Huang
iSpace Labs
EE & GINM, NTU
http://cc.ee.ntu.edu.tw/
~phuang
Road Map
Overview

What a sensor network is?
Applications

How can the sensor network be useful?
Problems & Designs

How should the sensor network work?
Sensor Network
Sensors?
camera
pressure
mic
accelerometer
thermal
gyro
GPS
Also the biomedical sensors: EMG, EKG,
pulses, emotions, etc
Sensor Nodes Today
MICA, 2001-2002
5.7cm X 3.18cm
Spec, March 2003
2mm X 2.5mm
4 MHz CPU
128K ROM 512K RAM
40kbps Radio range x00 feet
Sensors, battery not included
CPU, memory, RF transceiver
Sensors, battery, antenna not
included
< 1 dollar if mass-produced
Embedded Sensor Node
Intel® Xscale CPU
Analog and digital radio
Flash and SRAM memory
Sensors
Embedded Sensor Network
Applications
Home, Office, Healthcare,
Science & Nature, Agriculture
Intel Digital Home
UCSB Bren School
of Environmental Science and Management
Day-lighting
controls
Operable
windows control

taking
advantage of
on-site ocean
breezes
Airflow controls
based on CO2
level
Long-Term Nursing Home
• Fall detection
• Vital sign
monitoring
• Dietary/exercise
monitoring
Camera
Orientation sensor
Pressure sensor
Accelerometers
Muscle activity
The Channel Islands Fox
Fancy Californian Winemaking
Temperature
Soil moisture
Pest/disease
Taiwan Value!
Home: Security (Crime Rate)
Industry: IC (Energy crises)
Healthcare: Elder Care (健保 Burden)
Agriculture: Orchid Growing (Big Export
Business)
Our Applications
Emergency Alarm (chronic disease)
Location Tracking (cognitive declined)
Background Music Player (just lonely)
The Elder’s Companion
Sensor Network
WiFi
MicaZ
Sensor Node
Xscale-based
Embedded
System
Full-Fledged
Server
GPRS
Idea of Emergency Detection
Activity
Level
Normal
Now
0 hr
6 hr
12 hr
18 hr
24 hr
Prototype
Front
Courtesy: Steven Chiu
Back
Neck
1.
2.
3.
The value level does not
imply the level of activity
Going for the difference to
distinguish active vs.
inactive periods
Microphone is useful
detecting conversation
Accelerometer - x
Microphone
Accelerometer - y
Converting to Activity Level
Wavelet decomposition to
extract the difference
f(x)
Activity_level(xk) =
avg(f(xi), i=k-4,…k)
x
Sensor Network Design
Major Difference to other Networks:
1. Wireless Technology
2. Communication Model
Wireless Technologies
Mote
PicoNet
IEEE
802.15.4
bluetooth WLAN
Range
xm
xm
10 m
100 m
Max BW
40 kbps
224 kbps
723 kbps
11Mbps
Band
310, 433, 868-928
868/916M MHz,
Hz
2.4GHz
2.4GHz
2.4GHz
Power
(data
mode)
(1mA)
30mA
250mA
(10mA)
Communication Models
Address centric (for example IP)


Name the nodes
Data disseminated by the destination
address
Data centric


Nodes desiring data expressing ‘interest of
content’
Data disseminated based on the content
IP Communication
(Address Centric)
Organize system based on named nodes
Per-node forwarding state
Senders need to push data to the node address of
sink
To
Bob
To Alice:
To
Bob
To Alice:
To
Bob
To Alice:
My name is Alice.
My name is Alice.
My name is Alice.
Like
to
meet
girls
II am
II am
II am
am aBob
19-yr old
am aBob
19-yr old
am aBob
19-yr old
I
I
am
am
Bob
Alice
I
am
Bob
I
I
am
am
Bob
Alice
Tell
me about you
Tell
me about you Web search
Tell
meAlice
about you
II am
am Bob
Alice
girl…
girl…
girl…
->
Alice
Bob there
Chris
Alice there Bob there
Bob
Alice there
Data-Centric Communication
Organize system based on named data
Per-data diffusion state
Sinks need to be specific about what data they’d
pull
Here’s a 19-yr old Tell me Here’s a 19-yr old
Here’s a 19-yr old Tell meTell me
Tell me
girl…
about girls
about girls
about girls girl…
girl…
about girls
Girl info goes there
Girl info goes there
The Need to Go Data Centric
Node addressing not scalable


Difficulty of configuring/tracking small nodes
scattering around
Cost of re-configuration of nodes moving around
Server infrastructure not efficient

Difficulty of deployment
 DNS and search engines in sensor networks?



The sum of maintenance traffic (energy)
Additional delay
Information might be outdated by the time of
communication
Research Topics
Data dissemination (Routing)
Load balancing
Service differentiation
Naming and forwarding
Data aggregation
Time synchronization
Energy efficient MAC
Data Dissemination
The problem


Setting up ‘content-based’ states of interest to
direct data to the rightful destination
Naive dissemination may result in unreliable or
long-delay in delivery
Challenge

Medical data are mission critical
The approach


Shortest multiple paths
Magnets and nails
Our Design
Magnetic Diffusion
Medical Applications
Mission-critical data


Timeliness
Reachability
Average user


Wireless sensor nodes a must
Energy efficiency wireless communication
The Idea –
Magnetic Diffusion
Establishing Magnetic Field
3
4
4
3
2
2
3
1
Data Attracted by the Magnet
3
4
4
3
2
2
3
1
Reachability
Overhead
Latency-Base
Latency-Mobility
Latency-On Off
Major Findings
Going for timeliness

Magnetic diffusion, flooding, opp
Going for reachability

Flooding, magnetic diffusion, opp
Going for energy efficiency

Opp, magnetic diffusion, flooding
Best for Medicare Applications
Healthcare applications

Mission-critical data
 Require timeliness, reachability

Average user
 Energy efficiency
Magnetic diffusion

The solution to offer all the QoS required
Load Balancing
The problem


Setting up ‘content-based’ states of interest to
direct data to the rightful destination
Naive dissemination may result in short network
lifetime
Uniqueness

Co-existence of static and mobile sensor nodes
The approach


Mobility and power aware data diffusion
Mobile, power limited nodes avoid propagating
interests
Service Differentiation
The problem


The network delay could be long when the
demand is high
The reliability might not be perfect
Unique problem to health care

Some data could be life-death critical
The approach



2 class differentiation
Urgent data going flooding and high priority in
forwarding
Non-urgent data going magnetic diffusion and
regular forwarding
System Architecture
Services
Core
Urgent Data
Dissemination
Service
Broadcast
Adaptive
Diffusion
Routing
Non-urgent Data
Dissemination
Service
Priority
Regular
Forwarding
Naming and Forwarding
The problem


Addressing data by the content
Looking up all possible ‘states of interest’ to find
the matching entry to direct data
A real problem to sensor network for


Different data types
If not handled well, could be a serious
performance problem
The approach

Efficient string matching algorithms for limited
device
Two Algorithms
Preprocessing
Time
Space
Suffix tree O(P)
O(S)
O(S)
TST
Nlog(N)+O(S)
O(S)
Searching Time
O(log(N)+P)
Note: N means the number of words
S means the total length of words
P means the length of input testing string
Research Topics
Data dissemination (Routing)
Load balancing
Service differentiation
Naming and forwarding
Data aggregation
Time synchronization
Energy efficient MAC
Data Aggregation
Concept


Intermediate nodes have the computation
power to process and aggregate the data
passing through
Achieve data reduction
Why do we need to aggregate?

Energy is a critical problem in sensor
networks
Without In-Network
Processing
Data are simply passed on
Here’s a 19-yr old
Tell me
girl…
about girls
Girl info goes there
Here’s a 20-yr old
girl…
Here’s a 20-yr old
girl…
Here’s a 19-yr old Tell me Here’s a 19-yr old
Tell meTell me
girl…
about girls
about girls
about girls girl…
Here’s a 20-yr old
Tell me
girl…
about girls
Girl info goes there
Girl info goes there
With In-Network Processing
Data are aggregated and then passed on
Here’s a 19-yr old
girl…
Girl info goes there
Here’s a 20-yr old
girl…
Girl info goes there
Here’re two 19+
yr old girls…
Here’re two 19+
yr old girls…
Girl info goes there
Application-specific
Aggregation Here!
Average Dissipated Energy
(Joules/Node/Received Event)
Potential of In-network
Processing
0.025
Diffusion Without
Suppression
0.02
0.015
0.01
Diffusion With
Suppression
0.005
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Network Size
Application-level suppression allows diffusion to reduce traffic
and to surpass omniscient multicast.
Our Design
Data Aggregation for Resource
Inventory Applications
Resource Inventory
Ecologist tracking the amount
of animals over a certain
area
Retailers tracking the amount
of in-stock merchandizes
Factories tracking the amount
of parts
The Old vs. New Way
Sampling & inferencing



Sampling
Inferencing the population statistically
Issues:
 Bias
 Never sure what the real population is
Sensor network monitoring


Each sensor reporting location of objects
Count the number of distinct locations
Our Strategy
Minimizing the energy consumption
Send object counts within each sensor’s
sensing range


Aggregate location data right at the
beginning of transmission
One data per sensor, it scales well with
increasing object population
Energy Dissipation
When the population increases
Population Estimation
A problem still exists


how to get the population
from the object count
Cannot just sum up counts
We could find the tight
lower and upper bounds


Given the location of the
sensor
Given the radius of the
sensing range
A
Lower Bound Computation
Find sets of disjoint regions
Sum the counts

The population is at least
this much
Get the maximal of these
total counts
Equivalent to the

maximal independent set
problem in graph algorithm
A
Upper Bound Computation
Similar,
But finding the set of
regions that cover the
entire area
Sum the counts

The population is no
more than this
Get the minimal of
these total counts
Equivalent to the

Minimal coverage set
problem in graph
algorithm
Estimated Population
Estimation Range
Upper bound remains on 70~80%, and lower bound
remains on 30%
Discussions
The lower and upper bounds include all
possible population, not a statistical
result
Because the estimation range is steady,
possibly we could infer the exact
population by lower and upper bound.
The estimation range would strongly
depend on the deployment of sensors
Summary
What more convenience can technologies
bring?
Context-aware and intelligent services
anywhere and anytime
We need small devices with processing,
sensing, and communication capabilities
(SOCs)
See ‘communication’?
We need to design all over again how to
network these SOCs
Questions?
Polly Huang
iSpace Labs
EE & GINM, NTU
http://cc.ee.ntu.edu.tw/~phuang