Computer Assisted Learning essentials
Download
Report
Transcript Computer Assisted Learning essentials
Computer Assisted Learning
The Essentials
Shlomi Codish
Computer Assisted Learning unit
Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Outline
The rationale for CAL
The implementation of CAL
Hardware infrastructure
Manpower
Computer literacy
Software
Location and purchase Vs development
Implementation
Evaluation
Demonstration of software for physiology
SimBioSys
Synapse
The rationale for CAL - pro
Multimedia capabilities
Consistent educational content
Interactive learning
Self paced learning
Relatively pressure free
High accessibility
Motivational
Different learning methods available
Non linear presentation of data
Computer managed learning (e.g. HighLearn)
The Rationale for CAL - con
Expensive
Dependent on technology
Time consuming
Computerphobia
Lack of adequate compensation
Fear of redundancy
Does CAL work?
Does CAL work?
~200 studies (software/medschool)
12 prospective randomized studies
Most show “as good as” results
Some show CAL is better:
Takes less time
Better test scores
Better diagnostic abilities (same test scores)
Better scores but only for 1 year
“Burden of proof” not yet met
Need to utilize other CAL benefits
Implementation
Hardware
Manpower
The basics: computer lab, server, network
Accessibility – best is 24/7, the more the better
Computer lab personnel
CAL unit personnel (or equivalent)
Specific support for CAL activities
Educational design and evaluation
Computer literacy
Faculty, students
Implementation - software
Location of software
Internet
Catalogs
Marketing
Academic activities (conferences, journals,
etc.)
Word of mouth
Implementation - software
Implementation - software
Purchasing Vs Development
Consortia development
Factors to consider when purchasing
software
Adaptability
Cost and type of license
Internet connectivity
Interface
Implementation - software
Types of licensing
Site license – software
Site license – network only
Site license – internet access
IP limited
Password protected
Limited number – software copies
Limited number – internet access
Implementation - software
It is not enough to give the software to the
students!
Need to create structured approach
Define what you want to achieve
Adapt software as needed
Create “lab books” for students
Dedicate time in the frame of the course
Constantly evaluate and fine tune the use of the
software
Formal assessment of effectiveness in achieving
goals
Evaluation
Methodology has been flawed
Control group use problematic
Statistical power/small group sizes
Selection bias – multiple confounders
Durability of effect unclear
Various effects need to be evaluated –
knowledge, manual skills, other (i.e.
auscultatory) skills
Enthusiastic student acceptance does not
necessarily match objective outcome data
Demonstration
SimBioSys
Synapse