Transcript RIPA

Sistema Pubblico di Connettività
The public connectivity system
Ing. Gaspare Ferraro
Roma – 10 marzo 2009
Agenda
 Quick view on:
ICT Governance Structures Evolution
RUPA – Rete Unitaria della Pubblica Amministrazione (the National
Network that links the Public Sector Authorities)
RIPA – Rete Internazionale della Pubblica Amministrazione (The
International Network that links the Public Sector Authorities)
 Public Connectivity System (SPC) architecture:
The network architecture and the multiprovider tender
The Management Center
The VoIP Center
The CNIPA (the National Center for
IT in the Public Administration) is
an Agency with about 160
resources that operate within the
Prime Minister Cabinet to support
the Ministry of Innovation and
Public Sector
Cnipa role in the Public Sector
It establishes the strategies of ICT innovation
It sets the planning process
It controls the goals of innovation (by providing
recommendations and assessments)
It is in charge for the realization of the most important
projects within the Public Sector to:
 renovate the internal government G2G
 provide Public Sector services G2C,G2B
Has competence on the ITC training of Public Sector
managers
ICT Governance Structures
Evolution
Centro Tecnico
Rete Unitaria
della PA
AIPA
Structures
Authority Functions:
Project governance
functions
Agency functions :
• promote projects
1993
1995
1997
1999
RUPA
Projects
Centro Nazionale
per l’Informatica
nella P.A.
AIPA and Centro Tecnico
summarized functions
2003
2005 2006
RIPA and SPC
Rete Unitaria della
Pubblica Amministrazione:
• Connectivity and transport
• Interoperability
Rete Internazionale della
Pubblica Amministrazione
Connectivity Public Service
Operational
start-up of
services
Cnipa large projects
To maximize efficiency of P.A. with
integrated information resources,
electronic work processes and
information sharing:
International network (RIPA)
Connectivity Public System (SPC)
Cooperation Systems
To develop e-Government:
Citizens and companies web portal
Certified e-mail
National card of services
Mobile Government
Evolution of large Italian Public Sector networks
RUPA 2000-2006
Master Agreement, managed by
CNIPA, to provide “basic
interoperability services” and
“additional services” (e-mail,
proxy and related services).
INTERNET
Admin 1
Admin 2
RUPA
Admin n
RIPA 2005-2011
The “International
Network of Italian Public
Administrations”.
Londra
Los Angeles
Roma
Hong Kong
SPC 2006-2011
The system to provide
Public Administrations with
Connectivity, Security,
Interoperability and
Application cooperation
services.
RUPA (2000-2006)
 IP network of Telecom Italia dedicated to the Public Sector
 115 Administrations : 53 central ad. and 62 local ad.
 27000 connected sites
 94% of connections in xDSL and 70% with speeds up to 2
MANAGEMENT CENTER
Mbit/sec
RIPA: an International network: why?
 to realize an international network for the Italian Public Sector that
ensures secure connectivity
 to identify a services portfolio that guarantees the best technical
and economic market conditions, but also to rationalize Public
Sector costs through centralized management purchasing
 to provide a platform that enables the development of IT projects
at national/international level (consular personnel, data base, visas
project, biometric passport project, etc.)
The connected Ministries are the following: Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, Ministry of Defence, Institute for Business with Foreign
Countries, Customs, Tourism Offices
Geography
ZONE: A
ZONE: B
N. America
W. & E. Europe
APAC
Middle East &
Central & S. America Africa
Partner: EDS – BT Infonet
Network sizing in the
international landscape
450
400
350
300
250
200
Connected
seats
150
100
Italy
UK
Spain
Swizerlan
Belgium
Holland
Sweden
Austria
Germany
Denmark
France
Finland
0
Australia
50
RIPA services
Basic services
IP connectivity and Internet
services
 Support services (Network
Management and Monitoring)
Optional services
 “Quality of Service” services
(Ip-Mpls)
 “Security” services
Added value services
 Voice over IP
 Video conference
SPC (2006-2011)
Drivers:
 Multi-vendor network system
 Single carrier-independent price list
 Carrier-independent Performances
 Best price tender
Open System for new ICT services: security, wireless and VoIP
 Mandatory participation for Central Administrations
All local Administrations will also have to connect
SPC architecture
SPC components
Cooperation services
Network
Classic interaction
instruments
Basic connection
15
Security
Basic and enanced
interoperability
New integrated
services
SPC architetture – The network design
Q-ISP 1
PA
PA
Q-ISP
PAL
Q-ISP 2
PA
Pop
Pop
Q-CN
PAL
QXN
Q-ISP 3
PAL
PA
Pop
RIPA
Q-ISP 4
PA
16
PA
PA
The obvious question
 “Why don’t we use Internet?”
 To control the quality
 ISPs are “qualified” and under contract
 We can guarantee the QoS and the bandwidth
end-to-end
 We know the route of every single packet in our
network
 To avoid the typical ISP war in NAP
 CNIPA establishes the peering policies:
 Good sizing of the peering bandwidth (no
strangle of the bandwidth)
 Internet is the natural backup of the QXN
17
QXN (Qualified eXchange Network)
QXN connects all the qualified ISP networks, the
international network (RIPA), and the regional
Community Network;
QXN can provide “end to end” services
Architecture based on two POP
(RM-MI)
Availability = 99,99%, OWD<=20
ms, PL<=0,05%
DNS and NTP services
NOC and SOC h24 x 365
18
Flows
qualified Internet of PA
PA 1
PA n
Q-ISP
QXN
PA 1
PA 1
Big
Internet
Intranet
Internet
Infranet
Citizens / Industries
Q-ISP 2
PA n
PA n
Multiprovider call for tender
SPC architetture - Connettivity
Multi provider call for tender
Q-ISP 1
PA
PA
Q-ISP
PA
Q-ISP 2
PA
Pop
Pop
Q-CN
PA
QXN
Q-ISP 3
PA
PA
Pop
RIPA
Q-ISP 4
PA
21
PA
PA
Multiprovider call for tender
TARGETS
 More than one (minimum two);
 Same services at same prices;
 Competition between providers in order to have
low prices.
MAIN QUESTIONS
 Adjudication: lowest prices or more convenient
prices?
 Same amount of services for each ISP or not?
22
Multiprovider call for tender
FW
BT
Wind
60%
80
70
50%
40%
TI
50
50
50
Tis
90
85
80
70
60
50
100
60
50
30%
40
20%
30
PMP offerto
Dimensione della parte
70%
20
10%
10
0%
0
1^ parte
2^ parte
3^ parte
4^ parte
The provider offering the lowest prices wins
the biggest part. The other parts are won by
the other providers in the order of arrival.
23
Final list
The final list includes the following
winners:
Telecom
Wind Italia
10% 5%
BT-Italy
25%
Fastweb/EDS
60%
SPC architetture – QXN s.c.p.a.
Multi provider call for tender
Q-ISP 1
PA
PA
Q-ISP
Consortium
PA
Q-ISP 2
PA
Pop
Pop
Q-CN
PA
QXN
Q-ISP 3
PA
PA
Pop
RIPA
Q-ISP 4
PA
25
PA
PA
SPC architecture:
The Management Center
SPC architecture
CG-SPC
Multiprovider call for tender
Q-ISP 1
PA
PA
Q-ISP
PA
Q-ISP 2
PA
Nodo
Nodo
Q-CN
PA
QXN
Q-ISP 3
PA
PA
Nodo
RIPA
Q-ISP 4
PA
27
PA
PA
The Management Center
The management center helps CNIPA in the governance activities :
28
CG-SPC: Web Portal
29
Quality audit
Quality points
CG-SPC
30
SPC VoIP Center
SPC architecture
NIV-SPC
CG-SPC
Multiprovider call for tender
Q-ISP 1
PA
PA
Q-ISP
PA
Q-ISP 2
PA
Nodo
Nodo
Q-CN
PA
QXN
Q-ISP 3
PA
PA
Nodo
RIPA
Q-ISP 4
PA
32
PA
PA
What NIV do
 Manages on-net calls
 LCR (Least Cost Routing) of off-net calls
 Integrates different VoIP technologies
 New services (e.g. audio and video conference,
address book, click to dial, istant messaging,
unified messaging, presence, etc.)
33
NIV
PSTN
PSTN
gateway
softswitch
Carrier
@QXN
34
Carrier@QXN
Whole architecture at the moment
Coordinating Commission
2^ Gara
Multiprovider Call for tender
CG-SPC
Q-ISP 1
3^ tender
Hosting &
managem
ent serv.
PA
PA
consortium
Q-ISP
Messaging
and Coop.
services
Q-ISP 2
PA
PA
Nodo
Q-CN
4^ tender
Coop. Serv.
Center
PA
PA
Q-ISP
PA
PA
Nodo
PA
RIPA
Q-ISP 4
Technical rules
Rules for provider qualification
PA
PA
35