Collapse of Imperial..
Download
Report
Transcript Collapse of Imperial..
THE
FIRST TEST
Rome could easily defend its borders if attacks came from one
direction at a time
From either the Germans or the Parthians
But it attacks occurred simultaneously, Rome was trouble
Roman policy had always made sure that this would not happen
Parthian Empire kept weak by Roman encouragement of
corruption and well-time pre-emptive attacks
But in 226 AD, the Parthian monarchy was overthrown by the
Sassanians and suddenly Rome was faced with a vigorous
and aggressive enemy of its eastern frontier
GERMANS
Along the German frontier,
Roman policy aimed at
keeping the various tribes on
the other side continually
fighting among themselves
so they would never be able
to unite and threaten the
border
Movement of new tribes
into central Europe
around 200 AD forced
more established ones to
unite into nations and
push hard on the Roman
frontier
Ostrogoths,
Visigoths, Franks,
Alamanni
BORDER DEFENSES
Problems made worse by the
fact that legion were
concentrated only on the
frontier and units were fairly
isolated from each other
Therefore when barbarians
did break through border
defenses, there were no
troops further inside the
empire to check their
progress
German tribes broke
through Rhine defenses
four times between 254280 AD and advanced as
far as Spain and North
Africa before they were
finally stopped
Ostrogoths broke
through Danube
defenses and plundered
Greece
ROMAN RESPONSE
Romans strengthened their defenses
Towns and cities now surrounded by fortified walls
Forts constructed away from border
Cavalry units enlarged and consolidated into mobile legions to
quickly catch and defeat tribes who had broken through border
defense
In short, Rome divided army into internal, mobile forces and static
frontier garrisons
All this was a good idea but very expensive
CUTTING PARTS
Rome let go of some of its hardest to
defend territories
In order to concentrate its military
strength on more important areas
Let go of part of Rhine frontier,
Dacia, and Mesopotamia
Borders restabilized by 384 AD
Army morale was lower,
occasional mutinies and
desertions were more frequent
and an increasing number of
soldiers were of German barbarian
origin
But the army still held the
advantage against the
barbarians
ROMAN GOVERNMENT
Roman government had become a mess
Fragile system of imperial succession established by
Augustus had completely broken down
The basis reason is that the successors to Septimius
Severus were so incompetent and inadequate that
they managed to totally destroy the image of imperial
rule that had been so painstakingly built up over the
previous 200 years
Result was ambitious generals and chiefs of the
Praetorian Guard felt freer to gamble and seize
power
Pressure on the frontier also played a role
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC
RESULTS OF TURMOIL
Steady decline in population
Due to invasions, civil war, and
plague
Decrease in manufacturing and
agricultural production
Severe drop-off in trade
Overall rise in pessimism and gloom
in provinces
But at the same time the
demands of the state on the
resources of the provinces
increased
In short, the economic and
manpower base of the empire was
shrinking but the demands on that
base were expanding
Result was impoverishment of
the people of the empire
SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION
City residents were easiest to
squeeze with increased and
new taxes
People left cities as a result
Wealthy bought villas
out in countryside to be
safe from tax collectors
Smaller landowners
turned to larger
ones for protection
and aid from tax
collectors
In exchange for
this they gave
up their land to
the large
landowners
SUMMARY
A process of massive transformation began in the
provinces of the Roman Empire
The result of pressure from the state, declining
production and population, and the general insecurity
caused by civil war and barbarian invasion
Cities shrank to shadows of their former selves
Mainly populated by criminals and people too poor to
get away
Both groups kept in line by harsh laws, harsher
punishments, and huge garrisons of soldiers
The countryside, at the same time, was developing into a
pattern of isolated, self-sufficient, and semi-independent
units in which tenants, sharecroppers, and peasants tied
themselves to a powerful local landowner and his villa
DIOCLETIAN AND CONSTANTINE
PRAGMATIST
40 year old pragmatist who would halt the chaos of previous
decades and buttress the empire with a series of reforms that
gave it a new lease on life
Consolidated the trend towards authoritarianism that had
begun in the days of the Antonines and placed all
elements of society in a state of continual mobilization
Also added elements of his own personality
Humble origins, the son of a freedman
Immense practicality
Risen in the army through his own merits and
worshipped order and efficiency
Realism was diluted by military background
Believed in government by decree and assumed
orders would always be obeyed without question
TETRARCHY
Used precedent from Marcus Aurelius
to create Tetrarchy
Two co-emperors (each with title of
Augustus)
Each had an assistant and
designated heir (with title of
Caesar)
Diocletian was one of the co-emperors
But he also retained the position of
“chairman of the board” within this
system
After 20 years, both Diocletian and his
co-emperor retired and elevated their
Caesars to their former positions
Hoped that this new system would
provide for an orderly succession in
the future and free the empire from
the recurring nightmare of civil war
PROTOCOL AND PAGEANTRY
Protected himself behind
an host of secretaries
and courtiers
Size of imperial court
rapidly expanded
Also portrayed himself
as the earthly
representation of a god
Often portrayed with
a halo
Wore gorgeous
costumes
Golden crown,
robes of golden
cloth, jewelstudded shoes
Turned position of
emperor into a remote,
semi-divine figure,
protected by a wall of
protocol and pageantry
PROBLEMS AT THE PALACE
Successors would become distracted
by the pomp of the court
Also isolated by the court
Strong rulers dominated their
courtiers but weak ones became the
puppets of their own servants
Emperor and family served by
eunuchs
From Armenia or Persia
Had more access to ruler than
senators or generals
Dependent solely on the emperor
No past or future, no local ties,
and no family
Still notorious for the greed
and continually involved in
plots
Deprived of normal
pleasures, they sought
money and power
CONSERVATIVE MOTIVATIONS
Creation of Tetrarchy was in large
part a response to military crisis
When Diocletian became
emperor, Gaul was being
ravaged by Franks and
Alemanni and peasants were
in revolt
Diocletian’s friend
Maximian restored order
Diocletian made him
co-emperor as a
reward
Positions of Caesar were
created to deal with other
military threats
Young general named
Galerius became
Diocletian’s Caesar and
Constantius became
Maximian’s Caesar
Diocletian and
Maximian
Constantius
centered his
operations in Trier
in Gaul
Galerius guarded
the Danube River
from a fortress in
the Balkans
Maximian
made Milan
his
headquarters
None of them made
Rome their
headquarters
Diocletian resided in
Nicomedia and
guarded eastern
border
MOVE TOWARDS ABSOLUTISM
Diocletian erected a pyramid
of absolutism and oppression
in piecemeal fashion
Required his people to
support a never-ending
military effort, an
expanding bureaucracy,
and four imperial courts
Relied mostly on equestrians
for government officials
Because of their
experience and their
gratitude for advancement
Created 100
new miniprovinces,
governed by
equestrians,
and grouped
into 12 large
administrative
districts known
as dioceses
Separated
civilian and
military
authority in
the frontier
provinces
where most of
the army was
stationed
Chief administrator for each
diocese were called vicars
and were drawn from the
equestrian class
Despite his best efforts,
the system still swarmed
with parasites and
required a network of
spies and secret police
BIG ARMY/HIGH TAXES
Local officials required to
furnish a certain number of
recruits to the army each year
or else pay money to hire
soldiers in their place
Diocletian decreased size of
legions but increased their
number
Army probably numbered
500,000 men
To pay for all this,
Diocletian stabilized
currency and reformed the
tax structure
Many taxes now paid in
kind
Cash head tax on farm
laborers and tenant
farmers
UNFAIR SITUATION
Heavy taxes provoked
tenants to abandon farms
and run away
When a community
could not meet its
projected tax obligations
because of this, local
officials had to make up
the difference out of
their own pockets
They were also
responsible for
putting down rural
discontent and
capturing runaway
tenants
Great landowners
managed to avoid paying
their fair share of taxes
by bribing state officials
and secret agents
INFLATION
Rampant inflation had been a serious problem for the 50 years
before the advent of Diocletian
Prompted by war and swollen government expenditure
Diocletian’s monetary reforms prompted speculation in coins
among his officials
Who knew in advance that their value would change
To get a handle on the situation Diocletian specified maximum
prices, wages, and freight charges
Ordered death penalty for violators
Motivation was to stop inflation and protect his subjects from
overcharging profiteers
But edict was indifferently enforced and greedy merchants
risked death penalty to hoard products and sell them for
high prices on black market
Edict was no longer in effect by the time of Constantine
PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS
Diocletian ordered that all palace
officials worship the state gods of
Rome in 299 AD
Galerius pushed to extend order
to the army and to purge
Christian officers
Produced oracle who
predicted destruction of the
empire unless this was done
Diocletian bans
Christian rites and
confiscating books and
churches
Two fires broke out in palace and
Galerius convinced Diocletian that
Christians had started them
Diocletian then launches fullscale attack on Christians
CHANGING OF THE GUARD
Diocletian visits Rome in 304
and orders baths to be built to
commemorate visit.
Now 60 years old and
seriously ill
Galerius convinces
him to retire later that
same year
Maximian retired at the
same time
New Augusti, Galerius and
Constantius, appoint new
Caesars
Galerius: nephew
Maxentius Daia
Constantius: drinking
buddy Serverus
Diocletian retires to his villa
and spends his last days
gardening
RISE OF CONSTANTINE
New power struggles erupted
between new Tetrarchs
Ultimately resulted in all their
deaths and the victory of
Constantine
Son of Contantius
Born in Balkans and
poorly educate
Won final battle at
Mulvian Bridge
Between him and
Maxentius Daia
Had vision the night
before the battle that
he would win if his
soldiers had Greek
symbol of Christ on
their shields
Later
elaborated and
exaggerated the
dream
POWER
After victory, Constantine entered Rome,
disbanded Praetorian Guard, and left
Never to return again
Repaid debt to Christian god by endorsing a
policy of toleration
Became patron and protector of
Christians
Originally had a co-emperor and both had a
Caesar
But he ultimately eliminated them all
Was sole Augustus by 324 AD and
named his two sons as his Caesars
Believed in dynastic succession
DEVELOPMENTS
Constantine favored senators over equestrians and placed members of
the aristocracy in high positions
Roman society became stratified along class lines
Began to resemble caste system
Many occupations deemed necessary to national defense
were made hereditary
Municipal officials known as decurions were locked into
their jobs
Tenant farmers were reduced to virtual serfdom
Prohibited from leaving their land and completely
under the control of local landlords
Senatorial class avoided its obligations through bribery
Corruption of judges and administrators remained a big
problem
Created elite mobile military force made up of cavalry and mercenary
specialists
Issued stable gold coinage but most taxes still collected in kind
CONSTANTINOPLE
Converted old city of Byzantium into
a “New Rome”
New capital renamed
Constantinople
Not far from Diocletian’s old
headquarters in Nicomedia
Reflected shift of
empire’s center of gravity
to the east
Filled with massive public
buildings
Immigrants lured to new city
with cash gifts and promises
of free food and public
entertainment
FIRST CHRISTIAN EMPEROR?
Did not want to anger pagan majority and
thus went through motions of supporting
pagan rites
But support for Christianity became
official policy in 312
Mulvian Bridge emblem put on
all his banners and crucifixion
abolished
Not interested in theology but
impressed by organizational
strength of the Church
Became more religious as he became
older
Built a number of churches and
increased the influence of bishops
at his court
But postponed baptism until he
was on his deathbed
SAINT OR SINNER?
Lauded by Christian apologists and
detested by pagans, Constantine’s
reputation has not been high among
modern skeptics
He was a worldly, blood-splattered emperor
who was impatient with the fine points of
theology
But he was in awe of Christian magic
and willing to turn his back on 1000
years of pagan tradition
He was a revolutionary in a
religious sense and put the
Roman state under the
protection of a new god and into
the hands of a new religious
sect
REVITALIZATION
As reconstituted by Diocletian and
Constantine, the empire survived its first test
and enjoyed new burst of prosperity, stability,
and intellectual vitality
Witnessed by amazing construction
boom
Constantinople grew virtually
overnight from nothing to a huge,
beautiful metropolis
In the West, Trier, Milan, Ravenna,
and Rome experienced major
facelifts and expansion
Capital in West moved from Rome
to Milan and then to Ravenna for
defensive purposes
But Christian bishops in
Rome built huge basilicas