Transcript Roman+Republican+Government

Roman
Government
Political Structure
The Roman Republic was organised much like our modern
political system. Since the Romans did not want one man to make
all of the laws, they decided to balance the power of the
government between three branches:
•The Executive branch – Consuls and Magistrates
•The Legislative branch – Senate and legislative assemblies
•The Judicial branch – Councils and courts
A Roman Constitution
The constitution was largely unwritten, uncodified,
and constantly evolving.
Rather than creating a government that was
primarily a democracy, an aristocracy, or a monarchy,
the Roman constitution mixed these three elements,
thus creating three separate branches of
government.
The democratic element took the form of the
legislative assemblies, the aristocratic element took
the form of the Senate, and the monarchical
element took the form of the many term-limited
consuls.
Executive Branch
• The two leaders of the executive branch, the consuls, were elected for
just one year by the patrician class.
• They supervised the Senate and ordered the Roman army during wars.
• Each year, two consuls were elected together, to serve for a one-year
term. Each consul was given veto power over his colleague and the officials
would alternate each month.
• Consuls had extensive capacities in peacetime (administrative, legislative
and judicial), and in wartime often held the highest military command.
• Other members of the executive branch were the tax collectors, mayors,
city police, and other people in positions of power in cities.
Legislative Branch
• Assembly of the Curia – (comitia curiata) was the principal assembly
during the first two decades of the Roman Republic. The Curiate Assembly
was organized as an Assembly, and not as a Council even though only
patricians were members.
• Assembly of the Centuries – (comitia centuriata or "Army Assembly") of
the Roman Republic was the democratic assembly of the Roman soldiers.
The Century Assembly was organized as an Assembly, as every Roman
citizen with the required wealth could vote, regardless of class.
• Assembly of the Tribes – (comitia tributa) of the Roman Republic was
the democratic assembly of Roman citizens. The Tribal Assembly was
organized as an Assembly, and not as a Council.
• Plebeian Council – (concilium plebis) was the principal popular gathering
of the Roman Republic. As the name suggests, the Plebeian Council was
organized as a Council, and not as an Assembly. It functioned as a
gathering through which the Plebeians (commoners) could pass laws, elect
magistrates, and try judicial cases.
The most powerful part of the
legislative branch was the Senate…
The Senate continued...
• The Senate of the Roman Republic was a political institution in the
ancient Roman Republic, however, it was not an elected body, but one
whose members were appointed by the consuls, and later by the censors.
• After a magistrate served his term in office, it usually was followed with
automatic appointment to the Senate.
• Any motion that had the support of the Senate but was vetoed was
recorded in the annals as a senatus auctoritas, while any motion that was
passed and not vetoed was recorded as a senatus consultum.
• The Plebeian Tribune could veto any proposal passed by the Senate.
However, the Plebeian Tribune had to be present to enact his veto.
• The Senate passed money bills and control what money would be spent
on.
Judicial Branch
The judicial branch had six judges who were elected every
two years.
They were in charge of deciding punishments that
criminals would receive.
Executive magistrates: Consuls, praetors, censors, aediles,
quaestors, tribunes, and dictators. All these positions had
influence over law.
Plebeian Council acted as a judicial arm of the Roman
Republic. They passed laws and presided over judicial
cases.
The Greek historian Polybius (c.205-c.123 B.C.) admired the
Roman system and in his Histories remarked that:
. . . the elements by which the Roman constitution was
controlled were three in number, . . . and all the aspects of the
administration were, taken separately, so fairly and so suitably
ordered and regulated through the agency of these three
elements that it was impossible even for the Romans
themselves to declare with certainty whether the whole system
was an aristocracy, a democracy or a monarchy. In fact it was
quite natural that this should be so, for if we were to fix our
eyes only upon the power of the consuls, the constitution might
give the impression of being completely monarchical and royal;
if we confined our attention to the Senate it would seem to be
aristocratic; and if we looked at the power of the people it
would appear to be a clear example of a democracy.
Important time for Plebeians:
The Struggle of the Orders
• 494 BC - the plebeians threatened to leave Rome and set up their own
independent state (concilium plebis).
• 450 BC - the plebeians had won another important concession - the LAWS OF
THE TWELVE TABLES, codes specifying civic matters, crimes and the relations
among citizens and family members.
• 445 BC, the plebeians also won the right to inter-marry with the patricians
(the Lex Canuleia).
• 367 B.C., the tribunes Gaius Licinius and Lucius Sextus passed the LicinianSextian laws which specified (1) that one consul every year must be a plebeian,
(2) that the office of praetor should serve as assistant consul and (3) and that
there should be a law restricting the amount of land held by any citizen.
• 287 B.C., a law was passed that made the decisions of the Assembly of Tribes
binding on the whole state without action by any other body (the Lex Hortensia).
Questions
Make a list of the strengths and weaknesses of the
Roman Republic.
Why do you think the Plebeians were able to gain
considerable power during the Struggle of the Orders?
What are some examples of the checks and balances
of the Roman Republic? Why did these checks and
balances exist?