What to Screen? - Curriculum for the Hospitalized Aging Medical
Download
Report
Transcript What to Screen? - Curriculum for the Hospitalized Aging Medical
CHAMP
The Hospitalized Frail Elder
Teaching Strategies for
Identification & Assessment
Paula M. Podrazik, MD
University of Chicago
New Admission
Mrs.G 80 y/o BF DM type II, htn, s/pCVA, OA, OP
admitted for wt. loss, confusion, falls. Recently
hospitalized at an outside institution.
Meds: glipizide, lisinopril, lasix, asa, celebrex, fosamax q
week
Exam: Unkempt. A, O x 2 VS Afebrile BP 178/87 P 84
RR 16 Lungs clear, Cor RRR, Neuro non-focal
ER evaluation—unremarkable blood work, CT head—
no bleed
Intern reports patient is at baseline per daughter and
comments patient is just a “FTT.”
Questions raised
What is the importance of identifying
frailty in the hospital setting?
How do you recognize frailty ?
How do you define frailty in the aging?
What do you need to screen in the
suspected frail patient during
hospitalization?
Aging patients & the hospital setting
High rates of hospitalization
Account for 47% of all inpatient days (but
represent only 13% of the population)
Age 85 and over, twice hospitalization risk
High rates of readmission
25% of hospital admissions represent
readmission of older adults
Cost--outcomes
Fethke CC, Smith IM, Johnson N. Medical Care. 1986;24:429-437
Graves EJ, Gillum BS. National Hospital Discharge Survey: annual summary, 1994. Vital Health Stat. 1997;13:128
Worse outcomes for hospitalized
Older Adults
Delirium
Iatrogenic Complications
Functional decline
Nursing home placement
Hospital readmission
Caregiver stress
Mortality
Risk of rehospitalization—one
outcomes look at frailty
Age over 80
Inadequate social support
Multiple active chronic health problems
History of depression
Moderate-severe functional impairment
Multiple hospitalizations past 6 months
Hospitalization past 30 days
Fair or poor health self rating
History of non-adherence to medical regimen
Naylor M, Brooten D, Campbell, et al. JAMA. 1999;17:613-620
Hospitalization Outcome: The tension
for the Hospitalized Aging Patient
Baseline Frailty
Hospitalization
Outcome
Acute illness
Hazards of the
Hospitalization
Words that trigger the need to ID
& teach about frailty
Failure to thrive
Dwindles
Declining
A/O x 1 or 2
Confused
Poor historian
Malodorous
Recent discharge
Unkempt
Nursing home
Weight loss
Age 75 or over
Non-compliant
Needs assistance/ has caregiver
Falls
New Admission—Triggers to Teach
ID/discuss frailty
Mrs.G 80 y/o BF DM type II, htn, s/pCVA, OA, OP
admitted for wt. loss, confusion, falls.
Recently hospitalized at an outside institution.
Meds: glipizide, lisinopril, lasix, asa, celebrex, fosamax
q week
Exam: Unkempt. A, O x 2 VS Afebrile BP 178/87 P 84
RR 16 Lungs clear, Cor RRR, Neuro non-focal
Intern reports patient is at baseline per daughter and
comments patient is just a “FTT.”
Describe the Aging Population
Heterogeneous Population
Factors that contribute to heterogeneity
Aging physiology
Collected co-morbid conditions
Functional status
Functional Reserve of Older Adults
Vision loss: 27% those over age 85
Cognitive impairment: 50% over age 85
Assistance w/ADL: > 50% over age 85
Functional reserve losses impact on an acute
illness:
Presentation
Treatment
Morbidity & Survival
Recovery
What is frailty?
Being dependent on others
Having many chronic illnesses
Experiencing “uncoupling with the environment”
Being at substantial risk of dependency & other adverse
health outcomes
Having complex medical & psychosocial problems
Having “atypical” disease presentations
Having many chronic illnesses
Being able to benefit from specialized geriatric
programs
Experiencing accelerated aging
Rockwood, et al. Can Med Assoc J 1994;150:489-95.
Bortz WM. J AM Geriatr Soc 1993;41:1004-8.
Fried L, et al. J Gerontol Medical Sciences 2001; 56A(3): M146-M156.
Defining Frailty
Definition must include:
Association with aging
Multi-system impairment
Instability
Change over time
Allowance for heterogeneity within the population
Association with an increased risk of adverse
outcomes
Rockwood K, et al. Drugs & Aging 200 Oct 17(4):295-302
ACOVE–a model to ID/define the
Vulnerable Elder “in vivo”
Assessing the Care of the Vulnerable Elder:
ACOVE Project Overview
Develop a definition of “vulnerable elders”—
community dwellers, >65 & at high risk of functional
decline or death
Develop system to ID
ID medical conditions for which effective methods of
prevention& management exist
Develop set of Quality Indicators
Wenger NS, Shekelle PG, et al. Ann Int Med 2001;135(8) Supplement:642-646
Teaching about Frailty
Triggers to teach about frailty in the aging
hospitalized patient
Advanced age
Multiple co-morbidities
Suspected cognitive impairment
Suspected functional impairments
Psychosocial issues
Sensory impairments
Frailty Suspected:
Why to Screen?
Prevention
Impact on Outcomes
Prognostic Index for 1-year Mortality
in Older Hospitalized Adults
2 prospective studies—age> 70, assess
1-year mortality, points assigned—mortality risk
calculated.
Independent risk factors:
Male sex
#of dependent ADLs
CA
CHF
Cr>3.0
Low albumin level
Walter LC, et al. JAMA June 2001; 285(23):2987-2994
Comprehensive Assessment:
Impact on outcomes
Meta-analysis of Comprehensive Geriatric
Assessment programs
28-controlled trials, 4959 subjects allocated to
one of five CGA types and 4912 controls
Outcomes:
Mortality—GEMU programs 6 month mortality by
35%; HAS 36 month mortality by 14%
Hospital admission—all CGA programs
readmission rate by 12%
OR for living @ home favorable in all studies
Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, et al. Lancet 1993; 342:1032-1036
Hospital Elder Life Program:
A program of prevention
Yale hospital system, ≥ age 70, admitted
to acute care hospital
Screened for cognitive impairment, sleep
deprivation, immobility, dehydration, vision
or hearing impairment
Targeted interventions
Outcomes
Decrease in functional & cognitive decline
Inouye S, et al JAGS 2000; 48:1697-1706
Teaching about Frailty:
Summary teaching points
Baseline vulnerability or frailty affects
hospital outcomes
High risk for worse outcomes
Take measures to prevent delirium, falls,
functional decline
Identifying a vulnerable elder changes the
needs of the D/C plan.
Frailty Suspected:
What to Screen?
Cognition
Function
Affect
Other
Sensory function
Social
New Admission—Triggers to Teach
Cognitive Screening
Mrs.G 80 y/o BF DM type II, htn, s/pCVA, OA, OP
admitted for wt. loss, confusion, falls.
Recently hospitalized at an outside institution.
Meds: glipizide, lisinopril, lasix, asa, celebrex, fosamax
q week
Exam: Unkempt. A, O x 2 VS Afebrile BP 178/87 P 84
RR 16 Lungs clear, Cor RRR, Neuro non-focal
Intern reports patient is at baseline per daughter and
comments patient is just a “FTT.”
How common is dementia?
Age strongest risk factor for dementia
At age 65, prevalence 8-12%
At age 85, prevalence 50%
Persons with dementia in US- 4 million
Projected number by 2040- 14 million
Dementia and Delirium
MMSE >24/30→ Delirium risk 2.82(1.19-6.65)
Delirium associated with worse outcomes
Orientation board and cognitive stimulation
decreased confusion 26% vs. 8%
* Confusion = loss of 2 points on MMSE
Inouye SK, et al Ann Intern Med 1992;119:474-481
Cognitive Impairment & Functional
Decline with Aging
Cognitive impairment associated with functional
decline during acute illness
Study Design:
Cognitive screen grouped admissions:
No impairment
Mild impairment
Moderate/severe impairment
ADL/IADL/mobility measured 2 weeks prior
admission, discharge, 30 and 90 days.
Sands L, Yaffe K, Covinski K, et al. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences 2003;58:37-45.
Cognitive status on admission & risk
new NH placement at hospital D/C
Cognitive status Rate/odds NH
None
7.5% 1.0
Mild
13% 1.49(1-2.22)
Moderate-severe 29% 3.40(2.48-4.68)
Risk NH placement at 90 days after
hospitalization vs. cognitive status
Cognitive status
None
Mild
Moderate-severe
Rate/Odds NH
4.1% 1.0
11.7% 2.80(1.75-4.46)
26.7% 6.67(4.52-8.67)
Screen for Cognitive Impairment:
Summary Teaching Points
Prevent delirium
Prevent functional decline
Prevent iatrogenic injury—esp. med
choice & avoidance of restraints
Transition care appropriately
Screening Cognitive Impairment
Patient measure:
Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
Mini-cog
Proxy measure
Folstein MMSE
30 point screening test
Screens multiple cognitive domains
Not a direct screen of executive function
Studies usually use cut off 24 for positive
Reliability of results dependent on age &
education
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198
Troubleshooting the MMSE
Validation done under rigorous technique
Serial 7’s vs. spelling WORLD backwards
8th grade education or < → WORLD
>8th grade education→ serial 7’s
Administer in quiet, non-threatening
environment
Correct sensory deficits as much as possible
Reminders about MMSE
Screening test for cognitive impairment
Can help to risk stratify— delirium,
functional decline, iatrogenic injury,
pressure ulcers
Useful as a baseline to monitor change
Not a determination of decision-making
capacity
Screening Tools: Mini-cog
Step 1:Remember & repeat three unrelated words
Step 2: Clock-drawing test (CDT)—distracter
Step 3: Repeat 3 previously presented words
Step 4: Scoring:1 pnt. for each recalled word
•
•
•
•
Score=0; + screen for dementia
Score=1-2 with abnl CDT; + screen for dementia
Score=1-2 with nl CDT; neg. screen for dementia
Score=3; neg. screen for dementia
Borson S, et al. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2000;15:1021-1027
Screening Tests for Cognition:
Summary Teaching Points
Mini-cog—quick bedside tool
MMSE—screening tool only
If patient screens positive:
Use orientation board
Early mobilization
Discharge plan—unique D/C needs
Screen for functional, sensory impairments
New Admission—Triggers to Teach
physical function screening
Mrs.G 80 y/o BF DM type II, htn, s/pCVA, OA, OP
admitted for wt. loss, confusion, falls.
Recently hospitalized at an outside institution.
Meds: glipizide, lisinopril, lasix, asa, celebrex, fosamax
q week
Exam: Unkempt. A, O x 2 VS Afebrile BP 178/87 P 84
RR 16 Lungs clear, Cor RRR, Neuro non-focal
Intern reports patient is at baseline per daughter and
comments patient is just a “FTT.”
Functional Screening:
What are we talking about?
Gait assessment
Activities of daily living (ADL)
Bathing
Dressing
Toileting
Transferring
Feeding
Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)
Use telephone
Manage finances
Shop
Arrange transportation
Manage medications
Cooking
Functional Decline Occurs
in the Hospital
Functional limitations increase with age.
Functional decline occurs in approx.
34-50% hospitalized older pts.
Impact of acute illness
Impact of hospitalization
Interventions can decrease functional
decline (Hospital Elder Life Program).
Functional status determines D/C plan.
Summary of functional outcomes
during hospitalization
At discharge→31% declined
At 3 months→59% recovered lost function but
41% failed to return to pre-admission level of
function
At 3-months→ 22% re-hospitalized & association
with functional decline significant
Functional loss was associated with a
significantly higher 3 month mortality
Patient factors associated with
functional decline
older age
preadmission functional impairment
lower MMSE on admission
re-hospitalization
Sager M, Franke T, Inouye S, et al. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:645-652.
Worse health outcomes with
functional decline
Prolonged hospital stay
Higher mortality—twice the risk
Higher rates of institutionalization
Higher health care expenditure
Who is at risk functional decline
during a hospital stay?
Hospital based study @Yale
Prospective cohort study
Medical inpatients > 70
What are the risks for functional decline?
Functional decline: ADL loss
Two part study: Development and Validation
Inouye S, Wagner R, Acampora D, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;8:645-652.
Independent risk factors associated
with functional decline
Risk Factor
Pressure Ulcer
Cognitive impairment
Functional impairment
Low social activity level
Adjusted RR
2.7(1.4-5.2)
1.7(0.9-3.1)
1.8(1.0-3.3)
2.4(1.2-5.1)
How does one assess functional status?
Report
Self-report
Proxy report
Direct observation
Level of support
Independent
Needs assistance
Dependent
Activities of Daily Living
Bathing
Dressing
Transference
Continence
Feeding
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Using the phone
Traveling
Shopping
Preparing meals
Housework
Taking medicine
Managing money
Gait-timed Get Up and Go
Quantitative evaluation of general
functional mobility
Timed command w/rise from chair;
walk 10 feet; turn around; walk back
and sit in chair.
Wall JC, Bell C, Campbell S, et al J Rehabil Res Dev 200 37(1):109-113
Gait assessment scoring
Usual time to completion 10 seconds
Frail elder usually < 20 seconds
> 20 seconds needs PT evaluation
Performance on test associated with:
ADL/IADL performance
Falls risk
Risk of nursing home placement
Trigger to Teach:
Who to screen for functional impairment?
Who to screen?
Person over the age of 70
Patient who is re-admitted in past month
Person with at least 1 risk factor
Cognitive impairment
Functional impairment
Pressure ulcer
Low social activity score
Depression
Screen for function, cont.
When to screen?
After stabilization of acute illness
Prior to hospital discharge
What to do?
Chart orders- walking and range of motion TID
Ambulation problem- physical therapy
Dressing/bathing/feeding- occupational therapy
Function & the hospitalized elder:
Summary teaching points
Functional limitations increase with age
Functional decline occurs in 30-50% of hospitalized older
adults
Acute illness can lead to further functional decline
Hospital care can contribute to additional functional
decline
Models help stratify those at highest risk for functional
decline
Interventions decrease functional decline
Functional abilities help determine discharge location
and services required
Questions raised
What is the importance of identifying
frailty in the hospital setting?
How do you recognize frailty ?
How do you define frailty in the aging?
What do you need to screen in the
suspected frail patient during
hospitalization?
New Admission
Mrs.G 80 y/o BF DM type II, htn, s/pCVA, OA, OP
admitted for wt. loss, confusion, falls. Recently
hospitalized at an outside institution.
Meds: glipizide, lisinopril, lasix, asa, celebrex, fosamax q
week
Exam: Unkempt. A, O x 2 VS Afebrile BP 178/87 P 84
RR 16 Lungs clear, Cor RRR, Neuro non-focal
ER evaluation—unremarkable blood work, CT head—
no bleed
Intern reports patient is at baseline per daughter and
comments patient is just a “FTT.”
Frailty & the Hospital:
A Final Word
ID and teach about frailty
Screen for cognition, functional status,
psychosocial, sensory impairments
Impairments associated with worse
outcomes
Prevention one key.
The proper transition of care is the other.
Special Thanks
Joseph Shega
Don Scott
Aliza Baron
Greg Sachs
CHAMP faculty
CHAMP faculty course participants