What Patients Want from their Personal Health Records

Download Report

Transcript What Patients Want from their Personal Health Records

Personal Health Records:
Their Role and Purpose in
People’s Lives
Barbara M. Wildemuth
Kaitlin L. Costello
School of Information & Library Science
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Personal health record: Definition
A PHR is “an electronic, lifelong resource of health
information needed by individuals to make health
decisions. Individuals own and manage the
information in the PHR, which comes from
healthcare providers and the individual. The PHR
is maintained in a secure and private environment,
with the individual determining rights of access.
The PHR does not replace the legal record of any
provider.” (Burrington-Brown et al., 2005)
2
PHR use: Current status
• As of 2010, about 10% of Americans use a PHR (Markle
Foundation)
• 83% of respondents believe they should have access to their
medical records, and 79% of patients “think it is a good
idea to make health records electronic” (Pyper et al., 2004)
• 36% of patients would like to be able to add information to
their medical records (Pyper et al., 2004)
• 42% of people keep medical records in some form; of those
who don’t, 84% believe that they should (Harris Interactive,
2004)
3
PHRs: Current applications
4
Studies on PHR use and perception
• Uses of PHRs by patients:
– Communication with care providers (Wang et al., 2004)
– Viewing laboratory results (Ralston et al., 2007)
– Continued use by 37% of patients over 10 months (Denton, 2001)
• Benefits of PHRs:
– Can better participate in health maintenance (Ross et al., 2005;
Harris Interactive, 2004; Markle Foundation, 2003)
– Support better communication between patient and provider (Tang
et al., 2005; Harris Interactive, 2004)
– Would improve patients’ understanding of medical conditions and
physician’s instructions (Ross et al., 2005)
• Concerns about PHRs:
5
– Privacy and security (Pyper et al., 2004; Harris Interactive, 2004)
– Inaccuracy and incompleteness of records (Harris Interactive,
2004; Markle Foundation, 2003)
Research questions
• What are the purposes for which people might
create and maintain electronic PHRs?
• What types of data do people want to keep in an
electronic PHR?
• In what ways do people want to interact with their
PHRs?
• What concerns do people have about electronic
PHRs?
6
Study participants
• Parents with young children (n=11)
– Amy, Cary, David & Bree, Edouard, Elinor, Ellie, Helen, Kevin,
Marge, Monica*, Tony
• Adults with chronic illnesses (n=13)
– Becky, Jane, Joyce, Kail, Marie, Matt, Megan, Melissa, Mike,
Samantha, Sharon, Sonia, Tim
• Adults caring for older parents (n=9)
– Cathy, Evelyn, Judy, Kim, Margaret, Monica*, Nadia, Sandy, Sharie
• Older adults (n=11)
– Bel, Deb, Geneva, Herman, Isaac, Jack, Martha, Max, Peter,
Philip, Victor & Sarah
7
Semi-structured interviews
• How/where PHRs are and should be
stored
• What information a PHR should
contain
• PHRs for family members
• Who should have access to the PHR
• Ways that records can be searched and
sorted
8
Results related to the ideal PHR
•
•
•
•
•
•
9
Purposes for maintaining a PHR
What it will contain
How the contents will be sorted/filtered
Who can read it
Who can write on it
Form of PHR; how and where it will be
stored
Purpose: Summarize medical history
• A particular illness and its treatment
– Reports on the history of an illness and all the treatments and medications
and what did or didn’t work, from the initial diagnosis to the cure or other
end. My mother got diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and she saw so
many doctors and was on so many drugs that it seemed no one could
figure out what the right thing to do was. -- Marie
• Medications
– Reports on, you know, medication trends. You know, if I took something
before or if I start to enter something again that I haven’t done before, if it
said ,“Hey, this is new, would you like to keep track of such-and-such?”
Side-effects, that would be great, if it popped up and said, “You’re
currently taking such-and-such, are you having any side-effects?” Because
I forget to put those in. -- Megan
10
Purpose: Analyze trends
• Changes in symptoms over time
– Especially for ongoing issues, to try to figure out what had been done. If I
had a log of when I'd been feeling bad and how often it was, trying to
figure out whether or not things had changed. Because for long term
issues, I don't keep a log, but then I always wish that I had because it's
actually really hard to tell sometimes if I'm getting better or worse. – Tim
• Tracking health indicators or test results
– I think for my own self, it would be cool to plot out from a ten year period
or whatever, things like cholesterol level, the IDL and HDLs. And blood
pressure. The kind of things that matter. – Evelyn
• Monitoring diet and exercise
– I would definitely put my diet and exercise stuff in there, so I can track
how that affects the symptoms of my conditions. – Melissa
11
Purpose: Communicate with doctor
• To aid in communication
– The main thing is to use it as a way of interacting with the doctor so we both
keep track of what's happening. That's the no. 1 purpose I see for it. – Kevin
• To check record before doctor visit
– I would look at it just before a scheduled appointment, so I would know what I
was talking about when I went to see the doctor, so I could be more educated
when I walked into the room. – Cary
• As a reminder for follow-up with doctor
– We need to often make appointments and sometimes they won't make them...
they can't make them a year in advance or 18 months in advance, so we have to
remember when he was there so we can make an appointment for him to go
back – Tony
• To record what happened during doctor visit
12
– Every time I saw Dr. Smith, what date I've seen him, what we discussed, what
medication did he change, anything like that… I would see the patterns of how
I see him. – Geneva
Purpose: Handle an emergency
• When injured
– Even if you are in a car accident locally, and you are unconscious, it would
be good to be able to plug in to something that would see drug interactions
or your past history. I can see security problems with it , but it would be
nice. -- Nadia
• When traveling
– One thing that crosses my mind is that... I want to know about
international aspects of this. The records could be accessed by a physician
in Belgium? That would be… if I have a heart attack in Belgium, could
the physical get my records, previous heart tracing and this kind of stuff ?
That would be useful. --Edouard
13
Content related to treatment
• Medications
– My son has asthma and he takes his medicine everyday. We just changed his
medicine. He's done so well that we actually stepped back a little bit on his
medicine. That would be an important thing if I were to keep better records to know
exactly when he stepped back so if there is a change we can look back and know
when that occurred. -- Cary
• Lab test results
– It would be interesting to me to have access to my lab work, so I can compare the
labs and see if there is any correlation between a period when I'm feeling bad and
what my labs were looking like then, compared to when I'm feeling better. -Samantha
• Immunizations
– I really want to put in immunizations because I see that as a real problem now.
We live longer so we really need to be re-immunized. I travel to foreign
countries. So that's really the thing I want to keep the abreast of. --Martha
14
Content related to health status
• Family history, including genetic history
– I'm interested in genealogy and family history. And my father died two
years ago. Before that I was communicating with him about family history.
I want to know how my grandparents died and what causes might be
important for just my own medical history. -- Edouard
• Diet and exercise
– I suppose if I were on some regimen of exercise, it could be a way of
keeping track of which exercises to do. I’ve done some weightlifting and
it's good to vary the exercises you're doing. So perhaps a system like this
could give you a reminder of what you need to do each day, sort of keep
track of the rotation of things. -- Kevin
• Lab test results
– I think it probably would be helpful to look at things like blood
pressure over time. That’s not really a lab test, but it’s more a
maintenance-y kind of measure. -- Jane
15
Sorting the records in the PHR
• By date
– I would want to sort it by date, so I would be able to see a period of time. -Joyce
• By illness/condition
– There was a time that I had headaches. I went to a series of different
doctors. I found it is caused by my eye lids -- I had a droopy eye lid… So I
want to be able to sort by illness. -- Max
• By test
– Maybe have lab reports in a folder, maybe even not chronologically, just
what they are. Here is the lab results. Here is results for all the physical
exams. Here is the result of my cholesterol. --Evelyn
• By doctor
– Certainly chronologically. Certainly by clinic, by physician. --Max
16
Filtering the records in the PHR
• By date/time/season
– I can see a date filter. Although I've been tracking my thyroid for three
years, at some point I'll only care about the most recent two years. -Monica
• By illness/condition
– It would make sense to link the records by illness or by issue, whatever that
might be. For example, when my son had pneumonia, if I could somehow
link all those visits and prescriptions for that one illness, I could just view
that. --Kevin
• By doctor or type of doctor
– You could do it based on, for the hospital, all the hospital records, or all his
eye doctor records, or all of his cardiologist records... All of his
physical therapy things. -- Tony
17
Issues related to PHR access
• Those providing care should have access
– If I was under the care of a doctor for a particular illness, I would say OK,
you can look at everything. Because who knows what might affect it,
contribute to it or might be affected by it. –Judy
– I mean, I feel like, you know, in my opinion, full, unrestricted access for
physicians. I think physicians could do their job better if they had more
information at their disposal. --Mike
• Patient should have fine-grained control
– The best thing would be if the user could control who had access. --Kevin
– I would like to be able to pick out what fields that I would like to include
there. What things I believe he really doesn't have to know. It is nice to
have the control rather than turn over the whole database. -- Evelyn
18
Sharing the PHR across care providers
• Benefits
– I have several physicians… I would like there to be some easy exchange
among them. --Martha
– I guess the situation I see as most problematic is when you shift from one
physician to another for whatever reason. You know, getting those answers
transported takes a lot of time, can be cumbersome… And a lot of times I
felt like I was sort of made responsible for making sure that Specialist A
knew what Specialist B had done. --Mike
• Concerns
19
– Q: What if the record included things that happened outside of the Duke
system?
G: I don’t know why that doesn’t sound quite right to me. I suppose
because it's giving up a whole lot of autonomy to a doctor, that this way I
have a choice to do other things outside that system… If I wanted to do
something more alternative, which is what the acupuncture is, I would
like to feel that I’m doing that without anybody saying, “No, you
can’t ,”or “You shouldn’t”. --Geneva
Sharing the PHR with family members
• Need to share when in caretaker role
– I'm kind of, I wouldn't say the care taker, but I'm one of the people who
helps take care of my grandfather. He's 80 years old. He has a lot of
health problems… It's also important to have duplication of different
people knowing, because you never know who will be available to say,
“This is what's wrong with my grandfather”. --Sandy
– My son has asthma and he takes his medicine everyday. We just changed
his medicine… that would be an important thing… to know exactly
when he stepped back so if there is a change we can look back and
know when that occurred. – Cary
• Privacy concerns
– The only reason that I would want access to a family member's
information is when there is some ongoing health problem that I was
involved in their care with. Other than that, no. I don't think that's any
of my business. --Bel
20
Adding/editing data in the PHR
• Patient
– Personal notes
– Corrections to physician notes (added)
– Less important information (e.g., diet, exercise)
• Physician
– Anything that would go into the medical record
• Pharmacist
– Add medication information only; not even see other information
– Provide supplementary information about side effects and contraindications
• Family members
– Very few responses; mixed opinions
21
PHR location/control (1 of 3)
• Personal physician
– I would be a little more concerned about security in the doctor's office,
because if someone were truly looking for health info, I suspect they would
go there instead of to an individual. And I would want my doctor to have
backups. --Cary
– I’m not sure I want somebody else to be able to read my records. And I
don’t know how good my physician’s protective system might or might not
be. In fact at the moment – this is completely an aside – I barely have a
physician. My physician disappeared! --Isaac
• Insurance company
– Insurance companies make too many decisions based on what they think,
not what your doctor feels is proper for you… I don't think that they have
any business in your medical records. –Deb
– I have to say I don’t trust insurance companies all that much… They are
not out there to help anybody, really. They’re out there to make money.
That’s not the attitude I would like a person who has access to all my
health records to have. --Geneva
22
PHR location/control (2 of 3)
• Home computer
– Keeping my records on my home computer would be fine. But again, I
don't think we would update it, and we might not back it up. I think it
would be easily lost. Now, the home computer systems change so
frequently, it would become obsolete. It is very easy to lose records. -David and Bree
– I have mine at home. I just had a women that I work with, her son’s
apartment was just burglarized and the thieves took their computer stuff.
That would concern me. --Joyce
• Portable/mobile device
23
– Computers are not perfect – they can be hacked. If people wanted to keep
them perfectly safe, they could download data onto a CD, and only the
template would be on the computer and you'd back the data up to
something else. That's one way of keeping it off a computer that could
get stolen, or could be hacked or whatever. --Helen
– I would like it to be on a CD or on something, not just sitting on my
computer. I am afraid it would get erased. --Martha
PHR location/control (3 of 3)
• Government agency
– I think people are getting skeptical about the government having too much
information about us. There are checks and balances, but no. --Cathy
– Incidentally, I'm not at all an anti-government person. I would like my taxes
to be raised, believe it or not. I think there are lots of things to be done by
the government… But health records, no. --Herman
• Third party
– If it was a program like Quicken, where you could enter your stuff.... I guess
the company has your tax info and then it is sent to the government because
they get to have it too. And then you also have it on your computer. So it's
kind of shared in three places... Something like that could work. – Amy
– Q: Would you be willing to have your records on an online website?
P: No, no, no. Who would own that site and who would have access
to it? --Philip
24
Summary of initial findings
• What are the purposes for which people might
create and maintain electronic PHRs?
– To summarize their medical history, including:
• To analyze trends
• To communicate with their doctor
• To handle an emergency
25
Summary of initial findings
• What types of data do people want to keep in an
electronic PHR?
– Information related to the treatment of particular
illnesses or conditions
– General information related to their health status
26
Summary of initial findings
• In what ways do people want to interact with their
PHRs?
– View online and get reports
– Sort the records
– Filter the records
27
Summary of initial findings
• What concerns do people have about electronic
PHRs?
– Who controls access to the records,
• For viewing
• For adding/editing
– Where will the record be maintained
28
Implications
• Issues in interface design
– Balancing completeness and complexity
– Incorporating sorting and filtering features
• Issues in access and control
– Trusted third-party
29
Acknowledgements
• Co-investigators
• Catherine L. Blake, Kristina Spurgin,
Sanghee Oh, & Yan Zhang
• Funding provided by the National Cancer
Institute
• Supplemental grant PI: Gary Marchionini
• Primary grant PI: Barbara Rimer
30
References
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
31
Burrington-Brown J, Fishel J, Fox L, Friedman B, Giannangelo K, Jacobs E, et al. (2005). Defining the personal health record.
AHIMA releases definition, attributes of consumer health record. Journal of the American Health Information Management
Association, 76, 24-25.
Denton RC. (2001). Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience. Journal of
Healthcare Information Management, 15, 251-259.
Harris Interactive. (2004). Two in five adults keep personal of family health records and almost everybody thinks this is a good
idea: Electronic health records likely to grow rapidly. Health Care News, 4(13), 1-5. Last accessed online September 2008:
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2004Vol4_Iss13.pdf.
Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, Rokita K, Young D, Pierdon S, et al. (2004). Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a
patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11(6),
505-513.
Markle Foundation, Personal Health Working Group. (2003). Connecting for health: A public-private collaborative. Final report.
Retrieved September 2008 from http://www.connectingforhealth.org/resources/final_phwg_report1.pdf.
Markle Foundation. (2011). Markle Survey on Health in a Networked Life 2010. Retrieved March 2011 from
http://www.markle.org/sites/default/files/20110110_HINLSurveyBrief_1.pdf.
Moen A, & Brennan PF. (2005). Health@Home: The work of health information management in the household (HIMH):
Implications for consumer health informatics (CHI) innovations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(6),
648-656.
Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, & Crook C. (2004, Nov) Access to electronic health records in primary care: A survey of patients'
views. Medical Science Monitor, 10(11), SR17-SR22.
Ralston, J. D., Carrell, D., Reid, R., Anderson, M., Moran, M., & Hereford, J. (2007). Patient web services integrated with a shared
medical record: patient use and satisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(6), 798-806.
doi:10.1197/jamia.M2302
Ross SE, Todd J, Moore L, Beaty BL, Wittevrongel1 L, & Lin C-T. (2005). Expectations of patients and physicians regarding
patient-accessible medical records. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(2), e13.
Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, & Sands DZ. (2005). Personal health records: Definition, benefits, and strategies for
overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 121-126.
Wang MS, Lau C, Matsen FA, & Kim Y. (2004). Personal Health Information Management System and its application
in referral management. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 8(3), 287-297.