Changes to Oncology Coding 2009
Download
Report
Transcript Changes to Oncology Coding 2009
Changes to Oncology
Coding 2009-2010
Bobbi Buell
Version 11.0
Fall 2009
Disclaimer
Payers differ on their guidelines. Please verify coding for each payer and claim.
RAC information is literally changing on a daily basis.
This is not legal or payment advice.
This content is abbreviated for Medical Oncology. It does not substitute for a
thorough review of code books, regulations, and Carrier guidance.
This information is good for the date of the information and may contain
typographical errors.
CPT is the trademark for the American Medical Association. All Rights
Reserved.
All cartoons are purchased JPEG files.
Session Objectives
Discuss Proposed Fee Schedule for 2010
Discuss Coding/Options for PQRI 2009-2010
Discuss Coding for E-Prescribing 2009-2010
Discuss ICD-9-CM Codes 2010
Discuss HCPCS Codes 2010
Discuss the Status of RACs
Know What You Need to Do Next
Medicare Rules for 2010
Medicare Physician Payment Basics
Payments are based on RVUs for each code
(WRUs+PERVUs+MalRVUs)
The pool of RVUs is fixed – any changes must be budget neutral--
we had one of the few exceptions in 2004-2005.
RVUs are multiplied times GPCIs for your area.
The Medicare conversion factor determines the overall level of
Medicare payments
A formula spelled out in the Medicare statute determines the
annual update to the conversion factor and that has been a
disaster.
What’s Happening to the Conversion
Factor in 2010?
The SGR formula which has been flawed for years signals
that we will have a 21.2% DECREASE in the conversion
factor.
Physician drugs are now included in the SGR formula,
allegedly skewing it upwards. CMS has eliminated Part B
drugs from the SGR meaning lower future reductions.
But, for right now, we are stuck with a conversion factor of
$28.4061 down from $36.0666.
Impact of 2010 MPFS Changes
Other Fee Schedule Changes for
2010
CMS has long had confusing rules relative to consults. So, the
easiest way to deal with the problem is to eliminate them
altogether. What this means is:
New consults in the office will be coded as New Patients (99201-
99205). This means that no one in practice has seen the patient
at all for 36 months.
Established consults in the office will be coded as Established
Patients (99212-99215)
Hospital consults will be coded as Admissions (99221-99223)
with a new modifier signifying who was the admitting physician.
The new modifier is not official yet.
TeleHealth consults are the exception. They have special Gcodes.
CPT Rule Changes 2010
Concurrent Care
“Concurrent care is provision of similar services (e.g. hospital visits) to the same
patient by more than one physician on the same day. When concurrent care is
provided, no special reporting is required.”
Transfer of Care
“Transfer of care is the process whereby a physician who is providing
management for all or some of a patient’s problems relinquishes this
responsibility to another physician who EXPLICITLY agrees to accept this
responsibility and, who from the initial encounter is not providing consultative
services.”
“Consultation codes should not be reported by the physician who has agreed to
accept the transfer of care before the initial evaluation, but are appropriate to
report if the decision to accept the transfer of care cannot be made until after
the initial consultation…”
CPT Consultations 2010
“A consultation is a type of evaluation and management
service provided by a physician at the request of another
physician or appropriate source to either recommend care for
a specific condition or problem or determine whether to
accept responsibility for ongoing management of the
patient’s entire care or for the care of a specific condition or
problem.”
CPT Changes for Consultations 2010
Patients and/or families cannot initiate consultations.
Transfer of care definition in both office and hospital consults.
All admitting E/M services are bundled into an inpatient
consultation on the date of admission.
Only one consult in the hospital or nursing facility. This includes
inpatient and outpatient.
Documentation:
Request
Opinion
Written report
Changes to 2010 Fee Schedule
Accreditation Standards for Imaging Technical Component (-
TC)
MIPPA limited payment to accredited suppliers, effective in
2012.
Oncology practices are not an exception to the accreditation
rule, which they are under DME.
The final rule does not include who the accrediting
organizations are. This should be posted by January 1, 2010.
Fee Schedule Changes 2010
CMS Pricing for Part B Drugs
Will be ASP plus 6% in the office setting just like right now.
WAMP and AMP still have the 5% threshold in comparison to
ASP.
Thus, you can be paid 103% of WAMP, if the OIG and/or CMS
decides that drugs over the threshold will be paid this way.
Fee Schedule Changes 2010
Competitive Acquisition Program Changes
ASP plus 6% will be the price for this program. There were some
inflation problems before.
CMS is abbreviating the drugs available through CAP. There will only be
high priced drugs on this. In the final rule, leucovorin and 5-HT3’s
added.
CMS will allow participating practices to maintain a small amount of
CAP drug on-site. This will be if you have an ‘electronic inventory
device’. The CAP vendor could remotely approve drug for an individual
patient.
CMS will allow practices to transport drug between branch offices
under conditions that do not impact drug safety and stability.
CMS defines who can be a CAP provider, but does not say much about
who will be a bidder!!!
Fee Schedule Changes 2010
Signature for Lab Tests
Signature is required on laboratory requisition.
But, for Lab Tests paid under the Clinical Laboratory Fee
Schedule, it must be ‘evident that the physician ordered the
test’, if requisitions are not signed.
Medicare is going to put out more information to distinguish a
requisition from an order.
Fee Schedule Changes 2010
Off-Label Uses of Cancer Drugs
Qualified Compendia must have transparency.
They must have a posted evaluation process for listings.
They must make public any corporate or familial conflicts of
interest.
They must have these posted on their web sites by 1/1/10.
Non-compliant compendia may be removed from Medicare
coverage.
Value-Based Purchasing
and PQRI
Key mechanism for transforming Medicare from passive
payer to active purchaser.
Current Medicare Physician Fee Schedule is based
on quantity and resources consumed, NOT quality
or value of services.
Value = Quality / Cost
Incentives can encourage higher quality and
avoidance of unnecessary costs to enhance the
value of care.
PQRI Legislative Background
TRHCA – Tax Relief & Health Care Act, 2006
Established 2007 PQRI, 7/1-12/31/07, authorized 1.5%
incentive subject to a cap, claims-based reporting by
eligible professionals (EPs) of up to 3 individual
applicable measures for 80% of eligible cases
MIPPA - Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers
Act
Section 131: 2009 PQRI
Authorized PQRI 2009 raised incentive to 2%, adds
qualified audiologists as eligible professionals, no effect
on 2007 or 2008 incentive payments
FR requires CMS to post on our web site names of EPs
who satisfactorily report quality measures for 2009
PQRI
MMSEA - Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of
2007
Authorized 2008 PQRI, 1.5% incentive, eliminated
cap Incentive
Required alternative reporting periods and
alternative reporting criteria for 2008 and 2009
Requires alternative reporting for measures
groups and for registry-based reporting
Section 132: e-Prescribing Incentive Program
Authorized separate 2% incentive payment to EPs who
successfully use a qualified eprescribing system
eRx measure removed from 2009 PQRI --separately
posted measure specifications.
The Secretary has the authority to update the codes of
the electronic prescribing measure in the future.
FR requires names of eligible professionals who are
successful e-prescribers be posted on the CMS web site
PQRI :
Eligible Professionals
Physicians
MD/DO
Podiatrist
Optometrist
Oral Surgeon
Dentist
Chiropractor
Therapists
Physical Therapist
Occupational Therapist
Qualified SpeechLanguage Pathologist
Practitioners
Physician Assistant
Nurse Practitioner
Clinical Nurse Specialist
Certified Registered Nurse
Anesthetist
Certified Nurse Midwife
Clinical Social Worker
Clinical Psychologist
Registered Dietician
Nutrition Professional
Audiologist
2009-2010 PQRI Quality Measures
153 PQRI quality measures for 2009
168 PQRI quality measures proposed so far for 2010; this
includes all ways of reporting.
No earlier than November 15 and by December 31, 2009,
measure specifications will be available at:
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/pqri
Oncology PQRI Changes 2010
The Oncology Pain Measures (#143 and 144) will be
reportable ONLY by registries.
The Melanoma measures (#136-138) will only be reportable
by Registry in 2010. CMS is moving toward Registry reporting
and away from claims-based reporting.
There will be a new measure, “Cancer Stage Documented”.
2010 PQRI Measures Groups
7 measures groups:
Diabetes Mellitus
Chronic Kidney Disease
Preventive Care
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) (new)
Rheumatoid Arthritis (new)
Perioperative Care (new)
Back Pain* (new)
•
Measures in this measures groups are reportable only as a measures group,
not as individual measures
No Measures Groups for Oncology in 2010; but, will be 6
new ones if you are in a multi-specialty practice.
2010 PQRI Reporting Periods
Reporting period: January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2009
2 reporting periods for reporting measures groups and
registry-based reporting:
January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2009
July 1, 2009 – December 31, 2009
In 2010, 2 reporting periods apply to claims, registries, and
measures groups.
2009-2010 PQRI Satisfactory
Reporting Options
Criteria for claims-based submission of individual measures
(1 option):
Reporting period: January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2009
3 PQRI measures or 1-2 measures
if < 3 apply*
80% of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patient claims for 1-3
measures
•
If < 3 measures, measures are subject to measure applicability
validation (MAV)
Criteria proposed for 2010 annual reporting also includes that
each measure must have a minimum of 15 patients for each
measure. THIS WAS NOT APPROVED IN THE FINAL RULE!
New Reporting Option 2010
EHR/EMR Reporting
10 specific individual measures, but none in Oncology
Must meet these criteria if Oncology does get EMR/ EHR reporting including
Be able to transmit data elements per specific CMS criteria
Be able to separate out and report on CMS FFS patients only
Be able to transmit TIN/NPI information
Be able to transmit in approved formats
Be able to transmit in a HIPAA secure format
Enter into legal arrangements that permit receipt of and transmission of
patient-specific data
Obtain permission by NPI number
Must pass CMS test.
“Group Practices” may report, but only if they have 200 providers.
PQRI Things to Remember
• Patient must have the right diagnosis and that must be
linked to the PQRI codes.
• Codes must be arrayed per measure specifications.
• Patient must meet the age requirement.
• Codes must be reported with the denominator CPT or
HCPCS codes.
• Claims must have an NPI.
• 80% is calculated by NPI.
• Get forms at http://www.ama-
assn.org/ama/pub/category/17432.html
Billing Parameters for PQRI
Reporting Measures with Claims
C
E-Prescribing: The Carrot and the Stick
Year
Successful**
Not
2009
2%
0%
2010
2%
0%
2011
1%
0%
2012
1%
-1%
2013
0.5%
-1.5%
2014+
0%
-2%
In 2009 and 2010, physicians who successfully e-prescribe may receive a bonus payment of 2 percent of their overall
Medicare reimbursement in addition to a potential 2 percent incentive related to PQRI for a potential bonus of 4 percent
in Medicare reimbursement.
***No double incentives for those participating in the ARRA EMR incentive program.
2009 Successful E-Prescribers
“Successful E-Prescriber” is defined as an EP
who reports the e-prescribing measure established for
PQRI (i.e., Measure #125) for at least 50% of applicable
Medicare Part B FFS patients using a qualified system
E-prescribing measure is reportable only through claims
in 2009; in 2010, CMS proposes three methods—claims,
registries, and EHRs.
Limitation to applicability of incentive payment
Denominator codes for the e-prescribing measure
must comprise at least 10% of an EP’s total allowed
charges for all covered services furnished by the EP
during the reporting period
2009 E-Prescribing Process
Critical
Step
PBM
Visit Documented in Rx TransMedical Record & Rx mitted to
Generated
Pharmacy
Encounter
Form
Coding & Billing
N-365
NCH
Analysis Contractor
Confidential
Report
National Claims
History File
Carrier/MAC
Incentive Payment
Reporting Scenarios
E-Prescribing: 2009 Only
A 70 year old male patient presents to the
clinician’s office for medical care.
Scenario 1:
Scenario 2:
The clinician discusses
current medications and
prescribes new
medication, updates
active medication list in
eRx system, transmits
prescription electronically
to pharmacy
Reports G8443
The clinician documents
there is no change in meds,
no prescription generated.
Reports G8445
Scenario 3:
Pt has mail order pharmacy
that cannot accept eRx &
asks for hard copy.
Physician updates meds in
eRx system, eRx system
provides hard copy of
prescription to patient.
Reports G8446
All of these scenarios represent successful 2009 reporting
Coding for E-Prescribing 2009-2010
You must use a QUALIFIED E-prescribing system AND
Have an encounter with one of these codes
90801, 90802, 90803, 90804, 90805, 90806, 90807, 90808,
90809, 92002, 92004, 92012, 92014, 96150, 96151, 96152,
99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99211, 99212, 99213,
99214, 99215, 99241, 99242, 99243, 99244, 99245, G101,
G0108, G0109.
In 2010, it is proposed that these codes be added to reporting
denominator and qualifications: 99304, 99305, 99306, 99307,
99308, 99309, 99310, 99315, 99316, 99341, 99342, 99343,
99344, 99345, 99347, 99348, 99349, 99350, and 90862
E-Prescribing Reporting: 2010
Rule makes this much easier:
Eliminates G8445 and G8446
Report G8443 for at least 25 ENCOUNTERS per
Eligible Provider
That’s It!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course, you must e-prescribe…
Free E-Prescribing in Oncology!
• That’s right!
• Just for cancer practices!
• www.oncologyerx.com
• For more information,
contact me!
ICD-9-CM 2009-2010 (10-1-2009)
New Codes for Cancer
Merkel cell carcinoma, specified site 209.3_
Merkel cell, carcinoma, unknown primary site 209.75
Secondary neuroendocrine tumor 209.7_ (except above)
Low grade myelodysplastic syndrome lesions, Refractory
anemia with excess blasts-1 (RAEB-1) 238.73
Neoplasms of unspecified nature, retina and choroid 239.81
Neoplasms of unspecified nature, other specified sites 239.89
Tumor lysis syndrome 277.88
Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome 279.41
ICD-9-CM Coding 2009-2010 (10-1-2009)
ICD-9-CM Changes 2010 (10-1-2009)
New Codes to Describe
Oncology Administrators,
Coders, Billers After Seeing
2010 Regs!!!
799.21 Nervousness
799.22 Irritability
799.24 Emotional lability
799.25 Demoralization
and apathy
Redundancy of CMS Auditors
Roles of Medicare Improper Payment Review Entities
Source: American Hospital Association
Where Did RACs Find Overpayments?
Most overpayments were collected from inpatient
hospital services for medical necessity and coding
Incorrectly Coded 35%
Other
17%
Outpatient 4%
No/Insufficient
Documentation 8%
SNF 2%
Doc/Ambulance/
Lab/DME/Other 4%
Inpatient
Hospital 85%
Rehab 6%
Medically Unnecessary 40%
95% from
Hospitals
40
Source: CMS, The Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor Program: An Evaluation of the 3-Year Demonstration, June 2008
RAC Appeals Experience to Date
RAC Demo Findings
41
RAC Jurisdictions
A
D
B
March 1, 2009
March 1, 2009
August 1, 2009
C
42
3
RAC Contacts at CMS
CMS Contact
Person
Phone
A
Ebony Brandon
410-786-1585
B
Scott Wakefield
410-786-4301
C
Amy Reese
410-786-8627
RAC
D
Kathleen Wallace 410-786-1534
43
RAC Websites
Region A (Northeast states) Diversified Collection Services,
www.dcsrac.com/issues.html
Region B (Great Lakes states) CGI, http://racb.cgi.com
Region C (Mid Atlantic, South and Southeast states) Connolly
Healthcare, http://www.conn0llyhealthcare.com/RAC
Region D (Midwest, West Coast, Southwest states)
HealthDataInsights www.healthdatainsights.com/RAC.aspx
The RAC Initiative
CMS and its 6 Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)
Source: Local RAC Presentations
Mechanics of the RAC Process
Steps in the Process
Initial Communication from RAC
Receiving RAC Requests
Responding to RAC Requests
Notification of Outcome
Appeal Processes
What does a RAC do?
RAC Review Process
RACs review claims on a post-payment basis
RACs use the same Medicare policies as Carriers, FIs and MACs
NCDs, LCDs, CMS Manuals
Two types of review:
Automated (no medical record needed)
Complex (medical record required)
RACs will not be able to review claims paid prior to October 1, 2007
RACs will be able to look back three years from the date the claim was
paid
RACs are required to employ a staff consisting of nurses or therapists,
certified coders, and a physician CMD
47
RAC Process
Automated
RAC makes a
claim
determination
NO
Review
RAC decides whether
medical records are
required to make
determinations
Complex
YES
Review
RAC
requests
medical
records
Provider has 45
days plus 10
calendar days mail
time to submit
RAC has up
to 60 days to
review
medical
records
.
48
RAC makes a
claim
determination
RAC issues Review
Results Letter
to provider
(does NOT
communicate
improper amount or
appeal rights
including “no
findings”)
If no
findings
STOP
Automated Review
Discussion Period
RAC sends claim
info to
Carrier/FI/MAC
Carrier/FI/MAC
adjusts & issues
Remittance
Advice (RA) to
provider.
Code “N432”
Day 1
RAC issues Demand
Letter which includes
amount and appeal
rights.
Complex Review Discussion Period
49
On Day 41,
Carrier/FI/MAC recoups
by offset.
The Collection Process
Same as for Carrier, FI and MAC identified overpayments
Carriers, FIs and MACs issue Remittance Advice
Remark Code N432: “Adjustment Based on Recovery Audit”
Carrier, FI, MAC recoups by offset unless provider has submitted
a check or a valid appeal
50
What is different from the Demo?
Demand letter is issued by the RAC
RAC will offer an opportunity for the provider to discuss
the improper payment determination with the RAC (this
is outside the normal appeal process)
Issues reviewed by the RAC will be approved by CMS
prior to widespread review
Approved issues will be posted to a RAC website before
widespread review
51
What are Providers’ Options
Pay by check
Allow recoupment from future payments
Request or apply for extended payment plan
Appeal
Appeal Timeframes
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/OrgMedFFSAppeals/Downloads/A
ppealsprocessflowchartAB.pdf
935 MLN Matters
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/M
M6183.pdf
52
Minimize Provider Burden
Limit the RAC “look back period” to three years
Maximum look back date is October 1, 2007
RACs will accept imaged medical records on CD/DVD
Limit the number of medical record requests
53
Summary of Medical Record Limits
(for FY 2009)
Physicians (including podiatrists, chiropractors)
Sole Practitioner: 10 medical records per 45 days per NPI
Partnership 2-5 individuals: 20 medical records per 45 days per
NPI
Group 6-15 individuals: 30 medical records per 45 days per NPI
Large Group 16+ individuals: 50 medical records per 45 days
per NPI
Debate about what NPI means
Other Part B Billers (DME, Lab, Outpatient hospitals)
1% of the average monthly Medicare services (max 200) per
NPI per 45 days
54
Ensure Accuracy
Each RAC employs:
Certified coders
Nurses and/or Therapists
A physician CMD
CMS’ New Issue Review Board provides greater
oversight
RAC Validation Contractor provides annual
accuracy scores for each RAC
If a RAC loses at any level of appeal, the RAC
must return the contingency fee
55
Maximize Transparency
New issues are posted to the web
Vulnerabilities are posted to the web
RAC claim status website (2010)
Detailed review results letter following all complex reviews
56
New Issue Review Process for
AUTOMATED
RAC sends
New Issue
Review
Request
to CMS
If approved,
Issue is posted to
RAC website and
RAC may begin
widespread review
CMS
reviews and
decides
57
NOTE: All
demand letters
are sent AFTER
CMS has
approved the
New Issue for
Review
New Issue Review Process for COMPLEX
RAC issues
limited number
of medical
record requests
to providers
RAC
reviews
medical
records
Providers
send
medical
records
If approved,
Issue is
posted to
RAC website
and RAC may
begin
widespread
review
RAC
sends
New
Issue
Review
Request
to CMS
CMS
reviews
and
decides
58
NOTE: In cases
where CMS has not
decided by Day 60,
RAC will issue a
limited number of
Review Results
Letters without CMS
approval and web
posting
Issues in Oncology 10-09
Issue
Date
Region(s)
Description
Source
Blood Transfusions
8.4.09
All Region D, plus Ala, Fla,
Georgia, Ind, Mich, Minn,
S.C.
Blood transfusion
codes do not exceed
one unit
CMS Pub 100-04,
Chap 4, Sec 231.8
IV Hydration
8.4.09
All Region B, C, and D, plus
Ala, Fla, Georgia, N.C, S.C.
Hydration 1st hour
(96360) do not exceed
one unit
CMS Pub 100-04,
Transmittal 1019,
CMS Pub 100-04,
Chap 5, Sec 20.2
Once Per Lifetime
Codes
8.4.09
All Region B, C, and D, plus
Fla, Georgia, N.C, S.C.
Procedure not
possible more than
once per lifetime
CMS Pub. 100-08,
Chapter 3,
Section 3.6
Pegfilgastim, J2505
is 1 unit per 6 mg
8.4.09
All Region B, C, and D, plus
Fla, Georgia, N.C, S.C.
Units billed must be
multiples of 6 mg
CMS Pub `00-04,
Transmittal 949
Clinical Social
Worker
8.20.09
Florida Only
CSWs may not be
billed while patient is
inpatient
CMS 100-02,
Chap 15, Section
170
Pharmacy Supply
and Dispensing Fees
9.21.09
All Region A States
Pharmacy Fee May
only be billed on the
same day as a Part Bcovered oral/or
inhaled drug
CMS Pub. 100-04,
Chapter 17, Sec
80.7
What can providers do to get ready?
Know where previous improper payments have been found
Know if you are submitting claims with improper payments
Prepare to respond to RAC medical record requests by
appointing a reliable, trustworthy liaison
60
Know Where Previous Improper
Payments Have Been Found
Look to see what improper payments were
found by the RACs:
Demonstration findings: www.cms.hhs.gov/rac
Permanent RAC findings: will be listed on the RACs’
websites
Look to see what improper payments have been
found in OIG and CERT reports
OIG reports: www.oig.hhs.gov/reports.html
CERT reports: www.cms.hhs.gov/cert
61
Prepare to Respond to RAC
Medical Record Requests
Tell your RAC the precise address and
contact person they should use when
sending Medical Record Request
Letters
Call RAC
No later 1/1/2010: use RAC websites
When necessary, check on the status
of your medical record (Did the RAC
receive it?)
Call RAC
No later 1/1/2010: use RAC62 websites
Who will be in
charge of
responding to
RAC Medical
Record requests?
What address will
we use?
Who will be in
charge of tracking
our RAC Medical
Record requests?
Appeal When Necessary
The appeal process for RAC denials is
the same as the appeal process for
Carrier/FI/MAC denials
Do not confuse the “RAC Discussion
Period” with the Appeals process
If you disagree with the RAC
determination…
Do not stop with sending a discussion letter
File an appeal before the 120th day after the
Demand letter
63
Who will be in
charge of
deciding whether
to appeal a RAC
denial?
How will we keep
track of what we
want to appeal,
what we have
appealed, what
our overturn rate
is, etc.?
Learn from Your Past Experiences
Keep track of denied claims
Look for patterns
Determine what corrective
actions you need to take to
avoid improper payments
Submit experience to me
64
Who will be in
charge of tracking
our RAC denials,
looking for
patterns?
How will we avoid
making similar
improper
payment claims in
the future?
MACs/ Carriers per their
own internal screens
CERT Auditors
Who Else Can Ask For/
Deny/Review Stuff
Medical Integrity
Contractors
Bundling and Medically
Unlikely Edits
Private Insurance
Companies on behalf of
MA or themselves.
New HCPCS Codes 2010
Other HCPCS Changes
J9170 for Docetaxel 20 mg has been deleted for dates of
service after 12/31/09
-AI is for Principal Physician of Record, which may be use on
hospital consults---but this is not official yet.
Strategies for Success
Run your numbers for 2010 without consultations for Medicare patients.
Make sure your physicians are re-educated before the end of 2009 regarding the
proper coding and documentation for consults. Look for a CMS Transmittal before
12/31/09.
Be aware of the new anemia code. This is sure to change some policies. Assess
what private payers or doing.
Update your Superbills, EMRs, and CDMs for new codes.
Put together policies and procedures for the RAC doing complex reviews. Make sure
clinicians are involved.
Start getting prepared for “meaningful use” HIT incentives.
Participate in the struggle! The fight is not over yet!
Contact Info
Contact
[email protected]
[email protected]
800-795-2633
Newsletter is free!
Send all RAC information to me at the ABOVE E-mails or
FAX to 650-618-8621
Go to our website: http://www.onpointoncology.com
Thank You from onPoint Oncology LLC!