Integrated Models of Care: Pain Management
Download
Report
Transcript Integrated Models of Care: Pain Management
Integrated Models of Care:
Pain Management
Robert D. Kerns, PhD
National Program Director for Pain Management, VACO
Chief, Psychology Service, VA Connecticut
Professor of Psychiatry, Neurology and Psychology, Yale
University
Integrative care
Psychology, psychologists, and pain
management
Primary models of pain perception emphasize the central
role of psychological factors
Role of psychological factors in the development and
perpetuation of persistent pain is universally accepted
Psychological interventions for pain management are
accepted as efficacious and cost-effective
Approximately 20% of members of IASP and APS are
psychologists
Current president of APS is Dennis Turk, a psychologist
Goal of VHA National Pain Management Strategy is to
incorporate an interdisciplinary, multimodal approach to
pain management
Efficacy of psychological
interventions for chronic pain
Meta-analysis of RCTs of psychological treatments for clbp
Effect sizes were calculated from 22 RCTs
Positive effects of psychological interventions, relative to
numerous control conditions, were noted for pain intensity,
interference, quality of life, and depression
Cognitive-behavioral and self-regulatory treatments were
found to be efficacious
Multidisciplinary treatments that included psychological
interventions had positive long-term effects on return to
work
Integrative model of pain care
Stepped care approach to pain management
– Level one: Primary responsibility rests with primary care
providers
– Level two: “Living with Pain Class”
Patient education and rehabilitation model
–
–
–
–
–
Review of common pain conditions
Personal review of medications
Discussion of self-management model
Personalized exercise plan
Practice of self-regulatory pain strategies, e.g., breathing, relaxation,
activity pacing
– Level three: Comprehensive Pain Management Center
Comprehensive Pain Management
Center at VA Connecticut
Integrative clinical, research, and training program
Interdisciplinary staff
“Virtual Clinic”
Primary Care Clinic integration
Primary roles of psychologists
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Conduct comprehensive pain assessments
Development and enactment of integrative treatment plan
Care coordination
Primary clinician in delivery of psychological treatment
Assessment of outcomes
Education and training
Research
Targets for improvement
Improved
access
Successful engagement
Reduced drop-out
Enhanced adherence to treatment
recommendations
Maintenance of treatment gains
Relapse prevention
Ongoing research
Targeting these areas for improvement
– Refine CBT to promote engagement, adherence, and
outcomes
– Refine CBT for special populations
Elderly
Women with vulvodynia
Painful diabetic neuropathy
MS-related pain
– Investigate treatment process variables
Readiness for self-management of pain
Refining processes of referral
and engagement
Education/Training of primary care providers
Knowledge and attitudes about self-management
treatments
Patient-centered counseling/Use of motivational
interviewing techniques
Respond to patient concerns and beliefs that are
incongruent with adoption of a self-management
approach
Endorse self-management treatment and goals
Assure follow-up and continued coordination of
care
Training primary care providers
Brief educational session
Relevance of self-management and
rehabilitation approaches
Overview of multidisciplinary pain center
Review of pathway for referral
Group training followed by individual
consultation
Use of modeling (video) VIDEO_TS.IFO
PRIME-CBT
Based
in a primary care setting
Collaboration with primary care
practitioner (PCP)
Explication of referral process
PCP education and training
Modifications to CBT
Refining self-management treatment
Collaborative sessions involving primary care provider
Explicit attention to readiness to adopt a self-management
approach
Use of stage-matched tasks and processes of change (e.g.,
consciousness raising with “precontemplators”, increasing
support for “strivers”)
Use of motivational interviewing strategies (expressing
empathy, developing discrepancy, rolling with resistance,
and supporting self-efficacy)
Results of PRIME CBT study
Both CBT (n=33) and PRIME CBT (n=33), relative to TAU
(n=23), demonstrated significantly greater improvements on
measures of pain, disability, and emotional distress
PRIME CBT, relative to CBT, resulted in:
significantly increased adherence to weekly homework
and goals
significantly greater goal accomplishment
significantly greater patient satisfaction
Mean percent intersession adherence for PRIME CBT was
approximately 70%
Tailored CBT
CBT as inherently flexible approach that accommodates
to “prescriptive treatment planning”
Assess patient preferences for learning specific pain
coping skills
“Tailor” CBT on the basis of patient preferences
Employ motivational interviewing techniques to
encourage “forward stage movement” or enhanced
readiness to adopt specific pain coping skills